TBURGESS Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago Wow, people would actually pick Crum? Based on Crum-backs a few years ago, I guess. Give Ford an offence suited to his abilities (2 reads & run or ride and decide) & don't try to turn him into a pocket passer. Let him do what he does well and reduce the number of dropbacks and reads he has to do. He would be at least as successful as Streveler, although that's a pretty low bar. HardCoreBlue and Mark H. 1 1
M.O.A.B. Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago 3 hours ago, TBURGESS said: Tre Ford & it's not even close. I'm with TBurg.
SpeedFlex27 Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago 1 hour ago, Tracker said: The reality is that Demski has a lot more days behind him than in front of him and he is getting dinged more often and needs longer and longer times to rebound. Tre Ford ought to be a natural replacement. Ford has never played receiver. He's a natural running back. His stature fits a running back,. Not a receiver. 37 minutes ago, TBURGESS said: Wow, people would actually pick Crum? Based on Crum-backs a few years ago, I guess. Give Ford an offence suited to his abilities (2 reads & run or ride and decide) & don't try to turn him into a pocket passer. Let him do what he does well and reduce the number of dropbacks and reads he has to do. He would be at least as successful as Streveler, although that's a pretty low bar. Crum isn't a starter but he has improved a lot since he got to Ottawa a few years back. We'd have won more games with Crum than Streveler. Certainly the passing game would have been better. 4 hours ago, Pete said: I like Ford he has more tools than Streveler ever did. Im just not sure we can afford the salary And yes I think he could be qb2 just needs some proper coaching He'll never be a starter but he will be a coach killer. 4 hours ago, GCn20 said: I don't think coaching will help him much. He's just not a particularly good passer. I like your comment as I agree but I just can't press like when Noeller already has. I'd feel so dirty.
SpeedFlex27 Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago 5 hours ago, GCn20 said: As a QB he serves no purpose to any team right now. One could argue 3rd string, but I'd rather have a guy who hasn't washed out at that position. Agreed.
GCn20 Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago I like Crum but wouldn't want him either. If Powell were to shake loose tho. Noeller and wbbfan 1 1
wbbfan Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago 2 hours ago, TBURGESS said: Wow, people would actually pick Crum? Based on Crum-backs a few years ago, I guess. Give Ford an offence suited to his abilities (2 reads & run or ride and decide) & don't try to turn him into a pocket passer. Let him do what he does well and reduce the number of dropbacks and reads he has to do. He would be at least as successful as Streveler, although that's a pretty low bar. I don’t think many people here consider ford a legitimate qb. We’ve seen him handed a team several times in multiple situations with talent around him and he just floundered. I don’t think you give up on that guy entirely, But I think he needs to provide strong value and hedge his roster spot vs an american. It’s not hard at all to find a comparable running talent at qb to ford down south. 5200 yards, 16 tds 16 ints 3 years 53 games 7.8 ypa 4651 yards, 29 TDS 19 ints, 4 years 60 games 8.7 ypa Then you add fords rushing yards, it’s pretty lopsided in fords favor. But ford has been handed the starting spot 3 times, and hand better talent around him. Crum fell into starts in awful situations. Crum never had as good a co as fords worst. And awful rb talent. comparable wrs, ol prett similar too. If I had to pick one i’d take ford, but that’s also based on being able to use him in other roles and as a gimmick guy. I wouldn’t bet on ford becoming a regular starting qb. The list of available qbs is beyond ugly this year. Powell is the guy i’d want. after that it’s fliers on guys like evans, maier, and ford. Then you have the pitiful remains of mbts career, and an even uglier pile of scrap heap guys. Even at that, I’d have no interest in maier. HardCoreBlue and Piggy 1 2
TBURGESS Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago I doubt Crum or Powell ever becomes a starting QB. I think that Ford still has an outside chance. Our 2nd string should be a guy who can win games and hopefully become a starter in a year or two. Ford could be that guy and in the meantime, he would be a a great short yardage, change of pace, or ride and decide guy.
Tracker Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago (edited) 3 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said: Ford has never played receiver. He's a natural running back. His stature fits a running back,. Not a receiver. Ford is a gifted athlete, and from all reports, intelligent. Demski is built like a runningback so it should be doable, and Demski, once he has the ball, moves like a runningback. On pitch-outs, if Ford is a danger to chuck the ball with velocity and accuracy (ALA Tricky-**** Thornton), that ought to give DBs fits. Edited 17 hours ago by Tracker Piggy 1 1
GCn20 Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago 36 minutes ago, TBURGESS said: I doubt Crum or Powell ever becomes a starting QB. I think that Ford still has an outside chance. Our 2nd string should be a guy who can win games and hopefully become a starter in a year or two. Ford could be that guy and in the meantime, he would be a a great short yardage, change of pace, or ride and decide guy. Powell is FAR superior to Ford. This isn't even debatable. wbbfan 1
SpeedFlex27 Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago 33 minutes ago, GCn20 said: Powell is FAR superior to Ford. This isn't even debatable. An outside chance that will cost $150-200,000 a year. Nope. https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=3562044787441282 1 hour ago, TBURGESS said: I doubt Crum or Powell ever becomes a starting QB. I think that Ford still has an outside chance. Our 2nd string should be a guy who can win games and hopefully become a starter in a year or two. Ford could be that guy and in the meantime, he would be a a great short yardage, change of pace, or ride and decide guy. Coach Killer.
TBURGESS Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 11 hours ago, GCn20 said: Powell is a FAR superior passer to Ford. This isn't even debatable. FIFY Booch, Piggy 1 and M.O.A.B. 2 1
HardCoreBlue Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago I think this most recent convo/debate on current CFL QB’s Like Crum, Powell, Ford, Maier etc emphasis again how desperately we need an infusion of premium QB’s in this league. Mark H., Piggy 1, wbbfan and 1 other 1 3
GCn20 Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, TBURGESS said: FIFY Kinda what you want your QB to be good at though.
wbbfan Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, HardCoreBlue said: I think this most recent convo/debate on current CFL QB’s Like Crum, Powell, Ford, Maier etc emphasis again how desperately we need an infusion of premium QB’s in this league. absolutely. combine that with the over the hill gang most of the league is starting does the same. if some thing drastic doesn’t happen fast, it’s going to be second tier spring league offences we see each week HardCoreBlue 1
Stickem Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago Ford would be too expensive to bring in....As far as a starting qb ...that's very debatable....He can be very elusive as a runner BUT lacks the big accuracy in his passing game ...I want a qb that can do both....Crum started out slowly but now has proved he can do both....pass and run...I'd still give the edge to Crum if we had the shot at him and he certainly wouldn't be that expensive compared to Ford...We'll see what fa brings shortly
bigg jay Posted 37 minutes ago Report Posted 37 minutes ago FWIW, this analysis has us as a possible destination for Ford. Not sure I entirely agree with that but we do need a backup with legitimate experience. I wouldn't be opposed to it if we could make it work financially - like a bonus heavy contract that would only payout if Zach gets hurt or something. https://www.cfl.ca/2026/01/30/3-potential-landing-spots-for-tre-ford
HardCoreBlue Posted 18 minutes ago Report Posted 18 minutes ago 16 minutes ago, bigg jay said: FWIW, this analysis has us as a possible destination for Ford. Not sure I entirely agree with that but we do need a backup with legitimate experience. I wouldn't be opposed to it if we could make it work financially - like a bonus heavy contract that would only payout if Zach gets hurt or something. https://www.cfl.ca/2026/01/30/3-potential-landing-spots-for-tre-ford In such the small league we enjoy with a small stable of Qb’s, every team, excluding Edmonton right now, is a potential landing spot for him.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now