Stickem Posted yesterday at 07:40 PM Report Posted yesterday at 07:40 PM 6 hours ago, bustamente said: Hey I've seen that movie don't think I'll like the sequel yeah that movie was about a qb who shall go unnamed....Bombers still want the money returned AND until he does he will remain a pariah in this league...one helluva deebag
ShyGuy Posted 23 hours ago Report Posted 23 hours ago 23 minutes ago, Stickem said: yeah that movie was about a qb who shall go unnamed....Bombers still want the money returned AND until he does he will remain a pariah in this league...one helluva deebag Isn't there a direct butterfly effect surround Durant signing a contract, collecting his bonus, abruptly retiring and the Bombers signing Bighill? Noeller and Blue28 2
johnzo Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago 1 hour ago, ShyGuy said: Isn't there a direct butterfly effect surround Durant signing a contract, collecting his bonus, abruptly retiring and the Bombers signing Bighill? plus Streveller starting his very first game as a rookie while Nichols was banged up ...
ShyGuy Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago Please dress an extra WR for this game Brandon and Tracker 2
wbbfan Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago 2 hours ago, ShyGuy said: Please dress an extra WR for this game with our depth, more likely that we dress less
rebusrankin Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago 17 minutes ago, wbbfan said: with our depth, more likely that we dress less Wilson/Clercius/Sterns/Cobb/Mitchell with Corcoran as depth? That's my bet. Tracker 1
Pete Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago 4 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: Wilson/Clercius/Sterns/Cobb/Mitchell with Corcoran as depth? That's my bet. I think it will be Wheatfall in for Mitchell wbbfan and rebusrankin 2
wbbfan Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago 18 minutes ago, Pete said: I think it will be Wheatfall in for Mitchell yep sure sounds like it. 24 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: Wilson/Clercius/Sterns/Cobb/Mitchell with Corcoran as depth? That's my bet. I think corcoran will play over cobb. Should be cobb though. Tracker 1
Noeller Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago It's been Cobb and Wheatfall getting the reps in practice apparently... Expecting them to start. But we'll see... Bigblue204 and rebusrankin 2
GCn20 Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 17 hours ago, Brandon said: I was talking about Mike Kelly.... bring back the wild cat and get rid of the highschool shotgun formation baloney!! Don't forget the jet sweeps.
ShyGuy Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago Just feed Brady the ball. He is down on touches this week. Have him touch the ball 30 times and rack up 300 yards from scrimmage Bigblue204 1
WinnipegGordo Posted 5 hours ago Author Report Posted 5 hours ago rebusrankin, Noeller, Tracker and 2 others 1 3 1
ShyGuy Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago So 2 weeks to go to make the playoffs and the player with the 2nd most receiving yards on the active roster is the RB... and the player with the most is playing his first game since being murdered across the middle and missing 3 weeks. NBD BigBlueFanatic, wbbfan and Stickem 3
rebusrankin Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago I like Cobb starting instead of Corcoran. Stickem and wbbfan 1 1
HardCoreBlue Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, WinnipegGordo said: Based on what I saw on the sidelines last week against the Elks, it makes sense seeing Mitchell come off. On the one hand I'm really surprised he hasn't been released but on the other hand not surprised because we have limited depth at that position. Edited 4 hours ago by HardCoreBlue Piggy 1 and rebusrankin 2
17to85 Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 3 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: I like Cobb starting instead of Corcoran. However... if Cobb is the better option to start why the **** is Corcoran the guy backing up every game this season? rebusrankin, wbbfan, BomberBall. and 2 others 4 1
blue85gold Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 13 minutes ago, HardCoreBlue said: Based on what I saw on the sidelines last week against the Elks, it makes sense seeing Mitchell come off. On the one hand I'm really surprised he hasn't been released but on the other hand not surprised because we have limited depth at that position. what did you see?
HardCoreBlue Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 8 minutes ago, blue85gold said: what did you see? MOS showing his displeasure with him, JJ very animated in trying to coach him up while showing him plays on his playcard, Wilson trying to get Mitchell more engaged on the sidelines as Mitchell would drift off and stand alone while the D was on.
blue85gold Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 6 minutes ago, HardCoreBlue said: MOS showing his displeasure with him, JJ very animated in trying to coach him up while showing him plays on his playcard, Wilson trying to get Mitchell more engaged on the sidelines as Mitchell would drift off and stand alone while the D was on. Interesting, thanks. HardCoreBlue 1
GCn20 Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 22 minutes ago, HardCoreBlue said: MOS showing his displeasure with him, JJ very animated in trying to coach him up while showing him plays on his playcard, Wilson trying to get Mitchell more engaged on the sidelines as Mitchell would drift off and stand alone while the D was on. Yea, there were two plays in a row that Mitchell, just half arsed his routes at a light jog, Frustrated? Doesn't matter. Unprofessional, and MOS and JJ let him have it. I would be shocked if we see him again, and this probably solves the 'mystery" of why he never saw the field much this year. It wasn't some bias by MOS as previously reported. Noeller 1
wbbfan Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 54 minutes ago, 17to85 said: However... if Cobb is the better option to start why the **** is Corcoran the guy backing up every game this season? not only that, cobb is far pre valuable for depth on teams than corcoran Bigblue204 and Piggy 1 2
Stickem Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Mitchell was a mistake from day 1 ...yet we kept him around ...for why???? We should have parted ways right from the get go....yet we kept an obviously unprofessional player who was a moral deficit for the rest of the club...I'll never understand the move ...I don't know for sure who was the mastermind behind bringing him in in the first place while we let an ace receiver in Lawler walk....Someone has to be held accountable...Will there be????not likely rebusrankin 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now