3 turds plus ch F for effort

[Tracker]

41 minutes ago, BigBlueFanatic said:

1. Osh - the only things I recognize on this team are some names and the W.  

Physicality? Nope. Effort? Nope.

2. Coordinators - it’s like they burned the film of the hammy game.  Done with em

3. Blue f$cking pants.  They are the diapers of the equipment room, as the Bombers frequently sh!t themselves in blue pants.

Crappy Honker:

WFC for tricking me into having a little hope before the bye week

Fool me once.....

[Brandon]

2 hours ago, Booch said:

I'll say it again...coaching is just killing us...over and over

This team shows as poorly prepared save for the odd anomaly here and there 

The roster is chalk full of poor coaches decisions and when you have in game injury issues rarely are we covered with the glut of ST guys who's only use is on ST and are a detriment if they have to go in...our overall roster is garbage ad we have maybe 2 actual superstar/difference makers

We can't adjust to the game flow and repeatedly get out coached in second halfs...but we show/have no urgency to fix anything cause we claim we have all these starter quality guys and they will review the "film" and work it out...well we 16 games in season now..and are teetering into falling into 5th place

We let our roster rot to what it is now..a lot of well paid guys who can't cut it...and way too many guys with no business even being on roster...but coach loves em...so we hooped

We are definitely a mess and in serious need of a reboot...Sadly...all avoidable if we turned guys on roster over more liberally..paid guys who were top notch...instead of letting walk...and going after FA studs that could have supplanted some of our slugs...who cares how long they been here...if you can upgrade...u upgrade....we mismanaged a legit team of the ages and turned it into almost a joke now

Who knows if any of the guys we brought in but cut in lieu of all these long in the tooth coaches faves were better....but its obviously it couldn't been worse...and if anything they were young with possible upside...not old...declining...zero upside...and several who really just sucked anyway and prob wouldn't be rostered anywhere but here...but that's what happens when you look back..4..5 yrs and not forward...and Osh's comment at beginning of season says it all and I flagged it even then

"You look at a guys film from years past and see the success, and that's what they bring here" or something to that effect...and thats just crap way to build your roster...and we been seeing it in real time for 3 yrs now.

Factor in some bad coaching...and poor in game management...well u get what we've witnessed

 

Do you think for next season we bring back LaPo for round 3 (or is it 4 now?)  

[rebusrankin]

7 minutes ago, Brandon said:

 

Do you think for next season we bring back LaPo for round 3 (or is it 4 now?)  

It would be round 4. OC in 02 and 03, HC 10-12, OC 16-19.

[17to85]

Pretty sure lapo was their plan this year and he declined

[Noeller]

36 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

Pretty sure lapo was their plan this year and he declined

100% this...it's why it took so long to announce an OC. They tried to back the dump truck up to his door and he still said no. 

[Booch]

He wanted no part in sullying his rep with being hamstrung with how and who we roster...don't blame him

 

[Mark H.]

Ok, I could suggest taking half an hour to watch the condensed game, with cooler heads

Most of the first half was not bad at all. They were using BO effectively & completing some intermediate passes. O was pretty similar to what it was 2 weeks ago

After the TD on 3 and 4...ZC started mostly chucking deep and the rest was all too predictable

 

[Tracker]

2 hours ago, Brandon said:

 

Do you think for next season we bring back LaPo for round 3 (or is it 4 now?)  

No, but we could do worse, and have.

[wbbfan]

2 hours ago, 17to85 said:

Pretty sure lapo was their plan this year and he declined

I don’t think so, I think it was bourgoins, but they moved way to slow and lost out on him so they pivoted to hogan.

Tbf, I don’t think lapo would say no to a cfl coach job as oc or higher. 

1 hour ago, Booch said:

He wanted no part in sullying his rep with being hamstrung with how and who we roster...don't blame him

 

same guy went to ott, brought in matt nichols and a host of unimpressive players. 

Yt isn’t growing for him sadly, and he has seen his tsn work reduced greatly.