Wonder if Matt Nichols is worried about his job.Collaros brings more to the table and i would be trying to keep him.

Double trouble.

Edited November 15, 20196 yr by Throw Long Bannatyne

32 minutes ago, trueBlue83 said:

wasn't Sinnopoli the 3rd stringer in Calgary before switching to receiver in Ottawa??

Transition began in Calgary in 2013, he went to the RB's in 2015.

According to someone on that other (dead) site... MOS said something on his show about once a player has been declared a QB, you can't change it. That could mean during the year or it could mean ever, but Sinopoli makes me think it's during the year only. 

3 hours ago, TBURGESS said:

According to someone on that other (dead) site... MOS said something on his show about once a player has been declared a QB, you can't change it. That could mean during the year or it could mean ever, but Sinopoli makes me think it's during the year only. 

I put the quotes on here. You can go back and read them. He said that the way you start the season is usually how you're treated. 

7 hours ago, NorthernSkunk said:

Years ago didnt players play both offence and defence 😜

Yes Al Bundy went both ways...

Edited November 16, 20196 yr by kelownabomberfan

7 minutes ago, kelownabomberfan said:

Yes Al Bundy went both ways...

I prefer just women myself but to each his own.

12 minutes ago, kelownabomberfan said:

Yes Al Bundy went both ways...

He might have something to say about that comment lol...

2 hours ago, NorthernSkunk said:

He might have something to say about that comment lol...

It was an actual Al Bundy quote. Rebus nailed the response. It was the episode where Kelly was the SOPE girl in the locker room.

8 hours ago, kelownabomberfan said:

It was an actual Al Bundy quote. Rebus nailed the response. It was the episode where Kelly was the SOPE girl in the locker room.

Al Bundy would give the most inspiring pre-game speech this Sunday with 2 simple words..... "Let's Rock!"

Does anyone know whether a third QB would be prevented from dressing next season if he were to be declared as a DI? I believe the plan is that teams will be able to dress 21 NATs, 20 INTs, 2 QBs and 2 Global players for a total of 45 (same as this year) and to have a 46-man roster with one inactive (same as this year). So why couldn't a third QB be dressed as one of the 20 INTs, provided that the team did not put two QBs in the game at the same time? That way the third guy could still do short-yardage plays, could hold for snaps and could play special teams (and be available at QB if the other two got hurt). If that is not permitted (and to be clear I expect it will be), some teams will have 3 QBs on the 46 and the third will be the inactive player, just as Toronto often had four on the 46 this year and then made the fourth guy the inactive player.

 

 

1 hour ago, trueBlue83 said:

Al Bundy would give the most inspiring pre-game speech this Sunday with 2 simple words..... "Let's Rock!"