October 9, 20178 yr To be positive, which we might all need after Friday's debacle, we are going to have a winning record for back to back seasons. First time that we have done this since 2001-2003. Edited October 9, 20178 yr by rebusrankin
October 9, 20178 yr And if we have to lose...better now then when we can't fight another day. Plus if Nichols is out for a couple of games we get our backups in to see what they have. Let's see how we do in the playoffs before we have a melt down as fans.?
October 9, 20178 yr quick question - if the Bombers lose the final 4 games and depending on what the Riders do will the Bombers only have the cross over to look forward to? I guess there are too many variables to consider at the moment with 4 games still left to play etc.
October 9, 20178 yr 43 minutes ago, bb1 said: And if we have to lose...better now then when we can't fight another day. Plus if Nichols is out for a couple of games we get our backups in to see what they have. Let's see how we do in the playoffs before we have a melt down as fans.? How is this positive? It's downright depressing. Let's watch our backup **** the bed playing for Nichols. Another "positive thought" here. If we lose 4 in a row because of Nichols being out the chances of Ritchie Hall returning becomes greater as it will be the loss of Nichols & not a bad defense that will be bl;amed for an imaginary losing streak.
October 9, 20178 yr 1 hour ago, BBRT said: quick question - if the Bombers lose the final 4 games and depending on what the Riders do will the Bombers only have the cross over to look forward to? I guess there are too many variables to consider at the moment with 4 games still left to play etc. edmonton has 5 games left sitting at 7-6. If you assume the Bombers finish 10-8, Edmonton needs to go 4/5 to pass the Bombers Saskatchewan has 4 games left sitting at 8-6. They need to go 3/4 to pass the bombers So both these teams can only lose 1 game (and they play each other) to pass the bombers, which would cause us to cross over if we lost the last 4. So crossover is a slim possibility
October 9, 20178 yr 1 hour ago, SpeedFlex27 said: How is this positive? It's downright depressing. Let's watch our backup **** the bed playing for Nichols. Another "positive thought" here. If we lose 4 in a row because of Nichols being out the chances of Ritchie Hall returning becomes greater as it will be the loss of Nichols & not a bad defense that will be bl;amed for an imaginary losing streak. Cause as long as Nichols is back for the playoffs we have a good a shot as anyone to win the Cup. Edited October 9, 20178 yr by bb1
October 9, 20178 yr 5 minutes ago, bb1 said: Cause as long as Nichols is back for the playoffs we have a good a shot as anyone to win the Cup.
October 9, 20178 yr The magic number is 3 also edmonton and Saska both play eachother they both also play the stamps so they have both have a hard one.
October 10, 20178 yr 22 hours ago, Blue in the loops said: The magic number is 3 also edmonton and Saska both play eachother they both also play the stamps so they have both have a hard one. Whose magic number?... the Bombers magic number is 2... b/c they have the tie-break on both Sask and Edm...
October 13, 20178 yr To be positive.. We' ve yet to lose back to back games all season. I'm sure the boys will be fired up at home tomorrow night.
To be positive, which we might all need after Friday's debacle, we are going to have a winning record for back to back seasons. First time that we have done this since 2001-2003.
Edited by rebusrankin