Jump to content

B140

Members
  • Posts

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by B140

  1. 23 hours ago, Mark H. said:

    IMO and with all due respect, as I don't mind their articles when they are just info, but this is a new low for 3DN.  I mean, at least mention the possibility that teams could still fill holes via scouting and recruitment. Rider bias aside, to rank a team with track record of the Argos that low, is a fool's errand at best. 

    Honestly, I was surprised the arblows aren’t dead last. Given that they’ve lost basically their entire starting D aside from Toothpicks.

  2. 58 minutes ago, Bigblue204 said:

    I don't think it's wrong to say the Bombers beat the tar out of the riders in the WF. They did. They did so by having a game plan to attack the weakest part of their defense (regardless of what the media said, it was their secondary by a mile) AND make Trevor win the game for them, which was never an option.

    They also had the right players play well.

    When they win, it's because all of the components have come together properly. Just like when they lose, it's because multiple things fail. 

    To push it to one person not doing this or doing that is just flat out incorrect. Go ahead and say a qb should win games by himself. That's an incredibly ignorant take and completely ignores the reality of what makes football the greatest game on the planet.

    I don’t think the cheerleaders had anything to do with any of our losses 🤔

  3. 3 minutes ago, Brandon said:

    So much sourness on here...  it's not out of the realm of possibility that Winnipeg could offer Lawler 50 k more and Hamilton stays firm with what they originally offered.    To think it's 100% impossible is very weird.      It's doubtful,  but most certainly not impossible.  

    Weird things have happened in the league before where players change their mind at the last minute.    

    Richard Karikari says hello

  4. 1 hour ago, Booch said:

    so whats the purpose of the Designated National...I see we have WOLI and BOLO as that....

    I recall seeing something, but don’t remember the specifics on it. Think in our scenario, Grant can come in for McCrae, who can then come in for Woli or BOLO…these new designations are confusing no matter how they spell them out for us. I’ll see if I can find where I saw this breakdown

    2 minutes ago, B140 said:

    I recall seeing something, but don’t remember the specifics on it. Think in our scenario, Grant can come in for McCrae, who can then come in for Woli or BOLO…these new designations are confusing no matter how they spell them out for us. I’ll see if I can find where I saw this breakdown

    https://3downnation.com/2023/06/07/opinion-new-cfl-roster-rules-make-mockery-of-the-game/

  5. 1 hour ago, Wideleft said:

    Interesting (don't hate me) info from a riderfans poster regarding FA signings last year:

    Last year 141 pending FAs extended with their old teams while 65 would sign with new teams after becoming free agents. 89 more either never signed anywhere or were picked up well after free agency opened up. Of the 141 who did stay put 20 signed before the end of December, 65 signed between Jan 1 and the opening of the legal tampering window, 49 extended during the tampering window including the first day of free agency. 6 more opted to re-sign with their old teams in the 2 weeks following becoming free agents. We are still 11 days away from the tampering window opening. Last year 80 of the 141 or 56.7% signed in the period from 11 days before the tampering window opening and the start of free agency. There were some very big names amongst those 80.

    That sure is a lot of math for a gapper…

×
×
  • Create New...