HardCoreBlue

Send the house (pucks, bodies) at Binnington. Get in the grill of opponents best players. Free JM somehow. Win more puck battles than you lose. Win more faceoffs than you lose. Know your defensive responsibilities and keep to them. Box out opponents in front of Helle more than you don't. All players all lines finish your grade A/B scoring chances more than you don't. Know you're competing with the referees with their inconsistency. Adjust accordingly. Make the necessary adjustments to your PK/PP Dictate the game's intensity more than you do reacting to it. Let one less goal in than your opponents goalie and make more grad A saves than he does.

Time to get into the kitchen of their best players.

Yes best of three.

Real hard at times being a lifelong Jet fan with this rapid fire back and forth high and low experience. But we persevere.

That third goal by Schenn, way too easy. Was gifted that goal. Best of five, here we go.

This isn’t about my team does nothing wrong. This is about consistency in what’s being called.

Wow. No consistency in what’s called. Ffs.

CF needs to finish. Need 2nd line production.

Shief being mugged wherever he goes. Nothing to see here.

F’ing last minute goals. Need to box out better.

Need to work thru the Blues picking our players everywhere.

Has John Garrett been watching the same series as I have been. Says the refs have been letting these types of penalties go in the previous three games? Nope these refs have not been. Inconsistent all over the place.

At least you don't feel like CLG or Van?

If the Jets can bring that type of energy the Habs brought tonight for the game on Sunday, we’ll be in good position to wrap the series up back in the Peg.

Sorry man, but you lost me, especially from a coaching standpoint.

Getting smoked and dominated 7-2 is much different than losing 2-1 in a back and forth game that could have gone either way. Each of the above scenarios require their own type of adjustments/strategies heading into the next game. It’s not the same other than both incurred a loss. And I agree with you, this isn’t just on Helle in being shellacked 7-2, everyone shares the blame.

Here’s hoping it’s the ‘end it’ game.

Let's pan to the parents (insert other relatives/spouses as appropriate) in the stands every 3 seconds to get their reactions. Fun!

Knowing obviously it was not the main reason we lost this stinker and as objectively as possible, I’m still very confused on how they confirmed the original call on the ice of Perfetti no goal. The one angle from behind the net zoomed in clearly showed the glove catching net fully behind the post. What else does one need? This is why we have technology.

Nope, it is not the same other than both scores resulted in losses. But it obviously doesn't mean the Jets are done. How they respond on Sunday will be telling.

This is absolutely true. Sunday may tell us if the Jets are for real this year or just another season full of mirages. How they respond to a now very confident Blue team will be telling. Adversity here we go.

When angles show it clearly in that doesn’t reconcile with not conclusive enough. Anyways not going to win 16 straight.

I guess but all the glove netting is behind the line so don’t matter. Okay whatever. Just win the rest of the game steal one next game and finish this back at home. It’s a long grind to the finals, ain’t going to win every game. Sunquist acting tough. Same guy who falls when a Jet looks at him.

I don’t understand that call. That one angle clearly showed it was in. What are we missing? Do all angles have to show it in? Like what?

That one angle it shows it’s in.