Mark F

There are instances in the usa where ballots and voting records were destroyed, even when the authority had been ordered not to do so. Under Bush junior that happened. as kbf said there's a long history of this stuff in America, both sides. lol Texas AG

Well that says a lot about Andrew Harris. Fortunate to have him here.

what a clownish country, can't even get casting a ballot right.

Yet another slam against Winnipeg. The list is large isn't it? For some people the default is, "stupid fans, got it wrong again". It should be the reverse. Like it or not, they need the fans. Pro teams and players and uberfans should be as tough about what fans say as they are about getting nailed while going for a first down or decked by a Buff body check, or getting misty eyed about their team/coach/fav player. There's as much crying about negative fans as there is about anything else including is the coach any good. I don't care if somebody thinks the Bombers are on the edge of greatness.... go ahead. Why does anybody care if I don't think that?

O'Shea must have himself played when he was injured. I don't remember, but I'm guessing he was pretty tough. I suspect that as head coach he expects the same kind of thing from his players . He said something like that about Willy, when he played a week or so after some people thought he had a concussion... made a comment about how tough Drew was. Also this year when Nichols made a tackle. I don't know enough to comment on this kind of tough guy approach. But, I don't think Willy or the team benefitted from it.

I see tonight very much winning in the team that calls itself Boombers

My main request is that people in chat post how many drinks they've had. I can tell, ( I think) how far along JV5 is by the number of times I see" f**k so and so" , in his comments lol.

Even last game they were auditioning. So they aren't trying in the slightest to win.

Team doesn't seem to be very good. or maybe just the missing players. I have no idea. Pretty uninteresting for a so so fan like me. oops

lol Fan Boy. oh, forgot, wish you'd told me before

STOP THE PRESSES! http://www.dw.com/en/german-court-rules-beer-cannot-be-advertised-as-wholesome/a-36249952 Stand up sheeple!

Looks like everyone agrees on this one: NO MAAS!

I got them all right, (bombers) ? then changed from Lofler to Fogg.? should be Fogg goshdarnit.

Is this good? and thanks a lot for the observations

The Bombers aren't going to the Grey Cup this year. The team is just not good enough at this point. Need some offence over and above field goals to win the Grey Cup.

last year in one game, in the spring, Meyers smothered Ovechkin, and the Jets beat them, game here in wpg.

wish i could afford to buy people 60 dollar shots of Scothchhh

yup those two, pardon the interruption, are good. not such stuffed shirts. just remembered skip bayless was famous for telling everyone tibow was the greatest ever.

Sorry about that.

I'm just saying, that two or three commenters have said that's to get Davis reps, and that Glenn would go in if Nichols was out. Which makes sense to me. I think Do or Die said Glenn could run the offence in his sleep. DOD knows more than me about the game. Anyway, I for one would be surprised if they would play Davis over Glenn in a game that mattered.

People here say Glenn is the player that would go in if Nichols comes out, that Davis is listed second to get practise reps. So I've read on Morningbigblue anyway. I admit, I do not know, but I think I'd rather see Glenn, probably the top relief qb in the last ten years, in a game that mattered, over a guy who has played limted time (if any) in a regular season game in the CFL.

It's true that Nichols has had some games where he started poorly and worked himself out of it, managed to get a game winning drive in the last quarter.

I've seen quite a few comments here to the effect that Kevin Glenn could run Paul LaPolice offence in his sleep. He's done it many times before, coming in and and jump starting an offence.

looks like Atomic and Iso have left the building.... too bad... confrontational, but both have useful viewpoints.