Bigblue204

It is yeah

Thinking Fajardo wouldn't have the media on him is naive I think. The media know when they have a click bait machine and they don't just leave it alone. Fajardo going from the riders to the bombers is a story in itself. The difference between Fajardo and Evans is that Evans has the physical skill set needed to be a good passer in this league AND he's not a media weiner.

Wonder what kinda....options....he has.

Both those guys have shown they can hit a player past 25 yrds down field though. I suppose a 3rd stringer/backup ideally wouldn't need to...but when a team signs a QB they're also saying they'd be ok with him leading the O. Fajardo has proven he really cant. Prukop maybe as well..but he's not a wiener.

He's quick enough to get an NFL look.

Yes all of the reasons you've listed is why he didn't STICK in the NFL. That's what we're trying to say. Dalton had opportunities in the NFL previously that amounted to nothing. WE know he's a great WR. The NFL doesn't give two shits what anyone's done in the CFL if they don't think it will translate to the NFL - See #85. Lenius had zero NFL opportunities before the CFL. BUT had all the right measurables. He went for a workout, impressed enough to get a closer look and was eventually released. I really don't know how else to describe it.

see what voodoo said

WAAAY too much of a distraction. Absolutely no idea how to speak to the media. He's done in the CFL

He got a **** look because he has the potential and he's certainly more quick than Shcoen. He was also young enough to be maybe worth developing. Obviously it didn't work out like that....but I could see why they would take a chance.

I firmly believe this. I don't think his style of game translates to todays NFL. In the NFL today, the best WR are basically all quick twitch style receivers. Get off the line quickly to get that quick pass and YAC play going. If anything, if he can bulk up a bit more he could potentially make a wicked TE. But that comes with a lot of question marks too.

Hodge is gonna look like a dipshit when the GOAT of GOATS wins his 5th (should be 6th) MOOL award next November.

To be fair, making 6 field goals in a game is damn good.

I thought Lawler was their mvp....so is he talking about 2021?

I dont want them to give up on legs. But I agree with bringing in competition for TC and maybe taking something off his plate during the season. I'm still confused by how much he struggled with extra points.

Rene was a rookie correct? I'm not sure he ever really had a "job". He was hurt more than he played this year. Which is a reoccurring theme from his college days. It's unfortunate, but inthink this is based on his body not being able to do the job.

That's kinda weird.

wrong thread

Schoen stepped into Ellingsons role when Ellingson got hurt. And when he came back, he just stayed in the role that Schoen had earlier.

don't give me this **** after you edit your original post. Congratulations on figuring out that 2 assholes can exist at the same time. Criticism of 1 does not equal defense of another.

I could see Burnham hanging them up

And I expected this. No need to try and justify. You can't. They can't either.

If you believe they're actually working on this, the announcements etc won't come until we are closer to an election.

Sorry, my point was that for all intents and purposes we have a 3 party system in Canada. Two of them joining would make it a 2 party system. Sure those other parties would still technically exist. But like I said, they pose no real threat to actually hold federal power. So bringing us back to the original point...the LIBS/NDP joining forces would create a 2 party system and with that being said, I think it's a bad idea.

Fair...but let's be real. None of those parties are even remotely close to holding federal power. How many even have a seat?

That's a fairly ignorant comment to make. Those people absolutely understand why Israel exists...it's what they're doing that gets people upset. They're VERY close to becoming what they're supposed to be fighting against.