sweep the leg

Antoine Vermette got the same return that you think Buff is worth.

Buff has much more value than Boychuk did going into last season. For one, Boston had no choice but to deal players away b/c of the cap. For another, Boychuk had a career high of 23 points before his season with the Islanders.

There are positives and negatives to that, to be honest. I'd love it, personally - provided the stream was actually done properly. But I can see why a lot of people wouldn't. I'd like it to. I go to max one TC practice a year, so I'd probably see more of it with a live stream.

I don't see Cotton losing the job out of camp. I think the only uncertainty regarding rb is if we use Normand as the backup or DI a second import.

Russian Ice Hockey Federation will be punished b/c the team left the ice before the Canadian anthem. Full credit to Ovechkin, who was apparently trying to make his teammates stay.

You guys like me, right?

http://news.nationalpost.com/sports/cfl/montreal-alouettes-khalif-mitchell-accused-of-using-twitter-to-promote-holocaust-denial Khalif Mitchell accused of denying the holocaust on twitter...

Brad Richards is just about finished. I'd take Ward for sure. I love his game. He'd fit right in with our style of play.

Of course they're not, but he asked which one I'd want.

Ufa is Soderberg Rfa is Tarasenko

Where did you see that? Edit: Saw it from Bauming. That kind of sucks...

Chungh signed his contract this morning. No details http://bluebombers.com/article/bombers-ink-second-overall-selection-sukh-chungh

How does he get a helmet over that mane?

You can't honestly believe we took a guy #11 overall b/c of spite? That's so ridiculous I don't know how to respond to it.

My first round. I think Demski goes to Ottawa at #10 unless we trade up for him. 1. Ottawa - Mateas 2. Winnipeg - Chung 3. Toronto - McEwen 4. Montreal - Durant 5. BC - Ruby 6. Sask - Groulx 7. Edmonton - Ackie 8. Hamilton - Lavoie 9. Calgary - Waud

I like the #bringhimback hashtag for Muamba. It really is that easy.

Other than Mayweather's retirement fight, I can't think of any fight that will draw mainstream attention for boxing Canelo who lost to mayweather at 22 is the next big thing. Dont think team money would fight him again. He just boxed this weekend in an amazing 3 round fight, more action in a round than may vs pac. Check out the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LehQX1bbGQk#t=12 Yeah, I know who he is. I follow boxing casually, and actually saw his fight with Mayweather. It's too bad he couldn't have had a few more fights before that much of a step up in opponent. His fight with Kirkland was a million times more exciting than Mayweather-Pac. The Russian guy, GGG, is pretty good too. Those are about the only current names I pay any attention to now. I'd love to see Mayweather fight GGG, but I'm not sure he'd want to go up another weight class. I think Alvarez will be hugely popular with Mexican fight fans, but I don't think he'll ever reach the Pac or Mayweather level of popularity with mainstream NA audiences.

I think they keep #2 and look to trade up for a second 1st rounder. It's also possible they don't do that. I have no idea...

So why do they have to add to the trade to be able to get a long snapper for Watson? After they traded a 2nd round pick for him... Is this guy coming from Edmonton supposed to be really good?

He didn't seem very high on Groulx.

Walters is doing a presser in approx. 5 minutes http://www.bluebombers.com/live-press-conference

I don't see Demski dropping to us at #11. I'm full of cynicism though when it comes to things ever working out for us.

This is just stupid. I meant individually, not cumulatively. That should have been obvious.

It's personal preference. I get the thinking behind income splitting, I just disagree. I think tax rates should be based on individuals, not households. For GST, I think the benefit of lowering it for individuals is pretty insignificant in comparison to the cost of lost revenue for the government. but why? The whole idea behind marriage in this day and age is to combine things, why not income? Why should a house hold with two people making $60k pay less taxes than a household with one person making $120k and the other making nothing? Until my paycheque shows more than just my name on it, it's individual income. Why should somebody making $120k, with a wife also making $120k, have to pay more taxes than another guy making $120k, but whose wife chose to stay home with the kids? It's an unnecessary tax break for people the Conservatives see as being part of their base.