Mike

Fraser plays if Vega can't go. Fraser was injured two weeks ago. Is he healthy now? Haven't heard and media haven't really asked about guys who aren't on the active roster, Kemp too who looked to have a serious injury. Just because a player is placed on the one game IR doesn't necessarily mean they're injured. I'm pretty sure Fraser is fine. He's been hurt, although I don't know to what extent. The reason he's on the 1-game IR is so that they can pay him grace pay of a full salary, instead of a practice roster salary. Our practice roster isn't full, if he was healthy, that's likely where he'd be.

Probably because of Moore,Denmark and Kelly out playing them.. Got a question for you tho here, Name 3 receivers this year throughout the league who you would consider to be "legit rookies". Bet you can't do it, There aren't many.. That's what some need to redneckonize... Seriously just 3, but if you do name those 3, you have to explain why they are such superstars and if they are better than Denmark Kelly and Moore and what makes them better than those 3 i mentioned who are our starters. You do realize Romby is just depth right... Whats the issue there? Cuz he had a bad game where you think a fumble cost us oh so dearly? LOL, would you have changed your mind about him a bit if Howard didn't get the penalty cuz guess what, that was Bryant who scored that TD that didn't count. Just out of curiosity is it possible for you to reply to a post without doing it in a condescending tone? Every time I read one of your replies, you sound mad. That's not really my problem on how you decide to read other peoples posts. Maybe what i'd suggest is just read in a normal tone. It is your problem when you phrase things in ways such as "well guess what" and "you do realize" That's condescending, whether you mean it to be or not.

I'm not sure how he could be eligible. But I've heard some say he is and some say he is not. Just looked into it. He was active for a minimum of 11 games last year (stats recorded in 11) so I don't see how he could be eligible. Baseline is 9.

Probably because of Moore,Denmark and Kelly out playing them.. Got a question for you tho here, Name 3 receivers this year throughout the league who you would consider to be "legit rookies". Bet you can't do it, There aren't many.. That's what some need to redneckonize... Seriously just 3, but if you do name those 3, you have to explain why they are such superstars and if they are better than Denmark Kelly and Moore and what makes them better than those 3 i mentioned who are our starters. You do realize Romby is just depth right... Whats the issue there? Cuz he had a bad game where you think a fumble cost us oh so dearly? LOL, would you have changed your mind about him a bit if Howard didn't get the penalty cuz guess what, that was Bryant who scored that TD that didn't count. Just out of curiosity is it possible for you to reply to a post without doing it in a condescending tone? Every time I read one of your replies, you sound mad.

In before people ask a million questions that have nothing to do with Walters.

Velcro namebars to accommodate the constant roster turnover!

Banned from this site indefinitely.

Just give it a rest.

There are other ways to show your displeasure. You don't think Romby knew he was upset when he wouldn't even look at him yesterday?

I also would love to hear what people thought about that PI call last night. They really screwed themselves with that one. The league has really opened the floodgates on PI challenges now.

Good post gbill.

Totally useless. No chemistry with Willy. Bad penalties. Wrong routes. No ball protection. Get lost.

Will look good on players. Will look ridiculous on fans, which is fine for Toronto because they don't have any.

Screencap?

Really? Plenty of us knew Troy Smith sucked last year.

seriously? That's ... unbelievable.

I assume we will be, because if Woods is out, he's the one import we bench and Stoudermire comes on by default.

Impossible to know for sure, but the way Madani phrases it makes it sound as if it's a health issue.

So, we need to sign a guy like the year before they get on this list... then why haven't we? Because they're not going to sign if they have any aspirations for CIS/NCAA

I just can't stop chuckling at how bad Montreal is. Oh no! Alex Brink or Troy Smith. Maybe we'll see Jonny Crumpet or whatever his name is play against us on the 22nd.

He's a hell of an athlete, it just takes a lot more than that to be a running back. I still say he's got a spot in this league, but I'd move him to a Durie type role. Durie was an athletic running back who couldn't break initial contact before he became a stud receiver too.

How the mighty have fallen.

Could you elaborate? I don't understand.Some Argo we've never heard of has a huge game Because Derek Jones got a start? Possible... Because that seems to be what always happens to us. All the stars align for us to have what should be a rollover game and then we get destroyed by the present day Rocky Butler.

This idea occurred to me too ... Hinse may provide more than Goossen can right at this very moment. But I'm not sure. Toss up, probably a tougher decision than we think.

I'm hoping we've learned our lesson on Woods, and that he plays. We need his reliability on teams.I agree with you but that doesn't mean the coaching staff is thinking the same way we are.You've obviously seen more Stoudermire than I have, and it sounds like you're quite high on him. But O'Shea coming from the special teams pedigree he has, you would think that Woods' spot looks pretty secure right now. As Mike suggested, Unamba's probably a better 2-man reserve candidate than Woods.I also suggested Unamba (before Mike did) and I still think that's what will happen. Just throwing another option out there to discuss. lol is this a competition or something? I've noticed you do stuff like this a lot. No competition just stating the facts. I know some posters on here have a man-crush on you so they only read your posts. Kinda funny actually. Pretty sure nobody "only" reads my posts, they sure wouldn't get any value out of this forum by doing that. But hey, I'll be sure to check before sharing an opinion from now on, that way I can state you mentioned it first if applicable and you can have the meaningless recognition you seem to want.