Blue In BC

I don't get why we don't attempt a pass to Daniels every now and again. Daniels, MCI, Clercius and so on are essentially just pylons on the field in Bomber jerseys. No offensive output and our QB is sacked more often than potatoes being prepped for retail.

I don't get why we don't attempt a pass to Daniels every now and again. Daniels, MCI, Clercius and so on are essentially just pylons on the field in Bomber jerseys. No offensive output and our QB is sacked more often than potatoes being prepped for retail.

Yup. I think many of us thought the same thing going into TC. Too many decisions were pre-determined. 3 Canadian receivers was a starting point for failure on offence as an example.

The downward spiral since 2022 that you mentioned should have been a wake up call.

Yup. I think many of us thought the same thing going into TC. Too many decisions were pre-determined. 3 Canadian receivers was a starting point for failure on offence as an example.

The downward spiral since 2022 that you mentioned should have been a wake up call.

Yup. I think many of us thought the same thing going into TC. Too many decisions were pre-determined. 3 Canadian receivers was a starting point for failure on offence as an example.

The downward spiral since 2022 that you mentioned should have been a wake up call.

Why would they do that. Ratio would allow just benching Womack and starting 3 import receivers. We've been using a Canadian safety, SAM and DT in various combination. At times 6 Canadian starters on offence. So zero issues in 3 import receivers.

Why would they do that. Ratio would allow just benching Womack and starting 3 import receivers. We've been using a Canadian safety, SAM and DT in various combination. At times 6 Canadian starters on offence. So zero issues in 3 import receivers.

Why would they do that. Ratio would allow just benching Womack and starting 3 import receivers. We've been using a Canadian safety, SAM and DT in various combination. At times 6 Canadian starters on offence. So zero issues in 3 import receivers.

Why would they do that. Ratio would allow just benching Womack and starting 3 import receivers. We've been using a Canadian safety, SAM and DT in various combination. At times 6 Canadian starters on offence. So zero issues in 3 import receivers.

Why would they do that. Ratio would allow just benching Womack and starting 3 import receivers. We've been using a Canadian safety, SAM and DT in various combination. At times 6 Canadian starters on offence. So zero issues in 3 import receivers.

No kidding. I thought they'd add Stuart as a player that might be able to take on the roll Ball filled. I also thought adding Texada instead of Hazen might be useful helping coverage issues.
Essentially any other choice would have made more sense than leaving Hazen on the AR. I don't expect him to take one defensive snap.

No kidding. I thought they'd add Stuart as a player that might be able to take on the roll Ball filled. I also thought adding Texada instead of Hazen might be useful helping coverage issues.
Essentially any other choice would have made more sense than leaving Hazen on the AR. I don't expect him to take one defensive snap.

No kidding. I thought they'd add Stuart as a player that might be able to take on the roll Ball filled. I also thought adding Texada instead of Hazen might be useful helping coverage issues.
Essentially any other choice would have made more sense than leaving Hazen on the AR. I don't expect him to take one defensive snap.

Why did we add Hazen to the AR? Did he play on ST's or spend the entire game on the bench? We had an opportunity to add another import receiver or DB in case we had an in game injury.

We'll move a QB to the reserve list. I'd expect that to be Brown for a couple of weeks and then Elgersma.

Of course that's how the ratio works whether he's a full time starter or not. Daniels comes on and a Canadian receiver comes off. If the TE is an American then an import receiver comes off. Obviously in order to make room for an import TE then someone like Ayers would have to come off. Regardless, that TE would have to be capable of being an offensive weapon and not just an extra blocker. You even suggested that requirement. At the moment we've already switched to a 3 Canadian receiver in order to have 3 import OL.
The only other option is to replace an import OL for a Canadian for those snaps a import TE is used.
There are only 4 DI roster spots which is the bigger issue IMO. We're already NOT choosing to have a receiver as a DI. We CHOOSE to draft a Canadian TE as part of the equation forming the ratio and use of our DI's.

He could have given up a point because a FG would still win the game and we'd start at the 40 yard line anyway.

He could have given up a point because a FG would still win the game and we'd start at the 40 yard line anyway.

He could have given up a point because a FG would still win the game and we'd start at the 40 yard line anyway.

yeaH ZC earned his salary that last drive. He made the huge pass he needed to early and was calm and composed about *** and didnt force/rush anything...then allowed us to use BO and basically run the clock out knowing we had mr clutch to kick the winner.
I truly was expecting a forced ball into double or triple coverage for the nut kicking INT but he made a vintage ZC play...hopefully a sign of more to come and he looked way more settled and in tune with what Condell is wanting to do...He is one of the biggest signings this offseason and is gonna be good for multiple players on offence
Still wondering tho about ZC arm...will chalk this one up to basically horrible conditions and lack of reps thru camp with the #1's....Lets see what he does with hipefully ideal weather on thursday and a game under his belt.
We still tho really need another WR who has...or can have any kind of impact/influence in the game and on a defence...That Corcorran/Cobb combi is just flailing away at nothing ...If Clercius was available and we were to move him and Neild around outide...inside...etc then that be a lil more productive and beneficial.
Even tho Elsbury was "ok" he wasn't really a dominating force and the roster implications and taking an import away from elsewhere with his playing ...either on defence or at WR doesnt really have a real net benefit for us and makes us weaker overall
Now if Woodbey is out for the yr than we mist give Smith the opportunity as well as more Shay and with Ayers..Wilson..Jones..Smith..Shay..Griffin already on the roster we can replace Woodbeys spot with either another DL guy like Reese or Fletcher...Or add Singer ...Another DB would be a waste as Osh seems tied to running Kelly and Hallett out there...And with Singer on roster Vaval could if need be cover an injury in the DB backfield and Singer could help carry the load on returns
If Dixon needs ro miss a few games its a certainty that Fletcher gets on and be good to see what he does with the number 1's early in season so we kinda know what we got...Hopefully we dont do the dumb thing and slot in Korn...nothing like taking a step fotward with dline play and next game take 2 steps back
Also must say..Perkins is a smooth..smart and really good short yardage guy...Just imagine midway thru the yr when he more accustomed to CFL ball how good he will be...he's gonna bust a big run sooner or later...I hope too we install some rpo type package for him or some QB sprint out bootleg type stuff to gas a defence a bit and really spread things out....Nothing from the pocket for now but a lot of motion and option looks

Smart move yes but O'Shea won't move away from Ayers to open another spot.

Smart move yes but O'Shea won't move away from Ayers to open another spot.

Smart move yes but O'Shea won't move away from Ayers to open another spot.

Yeah, those are among my thoughts as well. I am leaning towards Kelly as the odd man out and Stuart in for ST work and versatility. Munier-Bailey is an asset. Gatkouth makes the roster almost by default. I like the idea of Jenkins and Dixon both on the roster.
What this means for Fletcher or Young is probably PR to start the season?

Yeah, those are among my thoughts as well. I am leaning towards Kelly as the odd man out and Stuart in for ST work and versatility. Munier-Bailey is an asset. Gatkouth makes the roster almost by default. I like the idea of Jenkins and Dixon both on the roster.
What this means for Fletcher or Young is probably PR to start the season?