Jump to content

66 Chevelle

Members
  • Posts

    534
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 66 Chevelle

  1. 32 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

    When you have an offense that doesn't run those kinds of patterns that is what happens. 

    6th most passes in 10-19 yards pass attempts... 12/30 or 40.0% - league leader comp %: Fajardo 23/32 or 71.9%, followed by Masoli 24/36 or 66.7%... most completions: Harris 34/56...

    2nd most passes in the 20+ yard pass attempts... 13/35 or 37.1%  - league leader comp %: Arbuckle 13/22 or 59.1%, followed by Fajardo 17/30 or 56.7%... most completions: Fajardo 17/30...

    this is as last week before games played as published by the CFL...

  2. 4 hours ago, 17to85 said:

    Seems to me that these complaints pop up every time Lapo is the OC here.

    I still say Nichols best throws are the mid range ones but we don't ever give the guy a chance to make them. 

    Nichols is dead last in the league in completion percentage for throws 10 to 19 yards with an underwhelming 40% completion rate... 6th in passes 20+ yard attempts at 37%...

  3. unless you allow the QB to stand and the pocket and have the receivers run their entire route it's impossible to determine whether or not a receiver is or will be open... but I'll add this, if you're waiting for the receiver to be in the clear you've probably already waited too long... also, just because a receiver may look to be covered in the early stage of a route, doesn't mean that he won't be open by the end of the route... and not to mention that receivers like Matthews who has a 5" height advantage you simply throw them open... ot throwing your receiver open with a back shoulder throw, etc...

    also, OCs can help receivers get open by route design, using other receivers to pull defenders away from the targeted receiver or create favorable match ups... running receivers at varying depths creates more space for receivers to work and can create larger throwing windows... but in most cases your QB is throwing to a spot, not a receiver per se, such as the Demski TD earlier this year... Nichols threw that ball almost immediately after the snap and while Demski was still covered... both on the same page, Demski makes the catch and the result is a 82 yard TD...

    but unless you are throwing to a receiver that is suppose to sit down in or under the coverage, most times you won't see a guy running wide open early in the progressions... you never see them open when your first or early second read is the check down at the line of scrimmage... I think that most are smart enough to understand that it does take longer to run 20 yards than it does to run 1...

  4. 2 minutes ago, Tracker said:

    We have another Canuck, Johnny Augustine who looks to be quicker and more elusive than Harris but probably not as powerful or experienced but his hands are unknown. I think we're ok there but its hard to replace an all-star. We also have Brady Oliviera on the IR and gone for the year but he looked very good in his brief stint.

    Oliviera's injury was unfortunate... not to mention it looked pretty nasty... hope he has a full recovery...

  5. 1 minute ago, Eternal optimist said:

    Well, back in 2017 they ended their regular season on a 3-game skid. Though they likely already had first locked up (13-1-1 before losing streak), so I think that technically counts, but really they were in cruise control gearing up for the playoffs... those games practically meant nothing to CAL.

    and in one of those last 3 games the Bombers played them at Calgary in a cold, wintery bluster which matched us up against young Mr. Arbuckle... it was LeFevour vs Arbuckle, which we won... ah... good times...

  6. 1 minute ago, Eternal optimist said:

    Mitchell is definitely the better QB, though I'd argue that's attributable much more to the team surrounding him than his individual abilities as a QB. He is the straw that stirs the Stamps' drink on offense, but they've also had fantastic D and STs over the last decade or so. Besides, even if we could've coaxed him over here, his contract would've been even more massive than what CAL paid for him, we wouldn't be fielding the same level of team... other areas would suffer.

    agreed… in my short time of following the CFL I find that Calgary is more of a 'reload' team than a 'rebuild' team... they seem to have a knack for finding good, young talent that is ready to play, or, they have had a system that seems to get the most of their players...

    I do think that it would be tough for Nichols to have a better all around cast of supporting players than he does this year... so for me, if he can't get it done this year I would have serious doubt of him ever being able to do so... I honestly think that we have assembled a championship caliber team, talent wise... of course, chemistry and luck also have a say in some of it...

  7. 1 minute ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

    Bo was interviewed last week here in Calgary. He says he knows how he is perceived.  He says that arrogance is just confidence & that a qb has to have that confidence to be a leader & to inspire his teammates to be successful.

    and I doubt that he cares what any fan or media member would have to say about his game in a negative way... I think that I recall hearing that BLM has not lost games back to back in his career yet? does that sound right?

  8. 7 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

    Well, it's interesting for sure. I think football at its core is the same as it was 30 years ago. A collision sport & not a contact sport. The only positions you see bigger players from that era are on the lines. Receivers, O & D backs as well as  linebackers are still the same.  It's a cool discussion, though.

    but, wouldn't it be cool if as a fan you could actually have teams from the past, in their prime, play teams from today? we can only dream of such match ups...

  9. 1 minute ago, Eternal optimist said:

    Still Nichols. Mitchell is so self-interested and conceded it's obnoxious.

    seriously? lol... that is interesting to say the least... it goes to show you that for some, it's about more that just your typical results...  and I get that actually, being an 'older' adult myself, I remember a time when 'team' was as important to the fan as the results were...

  10. and I feel like I've been fooled by Nichols just 1 to many times, glimpses of what could be followed by mediocre, at best, play and disappointing losses... all things being equal? I'll admit that I'd rather lose with Streveler if we're destined to lose anyway... at least I think I would never feel like we're out of the game, or, just sitting back waiting for the doom to appear as we've grown accustomed to with Nichols... for some, a winning record for the season is enough... I'd rather enjoy watching the games for the entire season... may lose more but I doubt there would be a lack of excitement while doing so...

  11. 18 minutes ago, Eternal optimist said:

    I meant given the sample size. Of course Nichols would have more turnovers, he's made ~230 pass attempts to Strevelers 13. If you were to gross up Streveler's current stats (Nichols has 17 times more passing attempts than Streveler) his numbers are gaudy:

    153/221, 1,394 yards, 17 TDs,34 INTs.

    Of course this is based off his current small sample size, and by no means is this extrapolation perfect... feel free to provide a better argument than "Streveler because he's just better".

    and he could very well have 250 attempts with 175 completions, 20 TDs and still only 2 INTs... we just don't know... but we do know that at least 1 of his 2 INTs was not on him, the ball went off the hands of a Bomber receiver, a ball that should have been caught easily, and was intercepted... there are all kinds of reasons, situations, or whatever, that play into things such as this...

    however, if you were to compare Bo Levi Mitchell and Nichols career numbers you'd see that BLM also has more INTS, but, he also has a win/loss record of 70-16 compared to Nichols 43-28... which QB do you take?

  12. 5 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

    Defensive players could take more liberties back then with offensive players like leading with the helmet legally. The game was more physical back then as the rules were different, I'd say. There were more safeties playing headhunter by emulating Jack Tatum in those days.

    and I agree with you that the rules 'back in the day' allowed a more physical type of game play... however, those guys, as tough as they were, were not the physical beast that today's players have become... not to say they were strong, mean, aggressive, and at times even played dirty, lol... but you would also see these guys sitting in the locker room smoking too, lol... today's players are bigger, faster, and stronger than those of days gone by... they also play more games than those before them...

    truth be told, it's probably hard to compare the two eras fairly... but you don't see today's professional running backs have the length of career that a lot of running back of the past had...  but regardless, I don't think any modern player can approach 300 to 400 touches a year for many seasons without blowing something out... a lot of todays professional running backs have already seen similar action at the college level, a lot have been used like a loaned out mule already by the time they make the pros, lol...

    if nothing else, it's worth knowing and watching how it pans out...

  13. 2 minutes ago, Eternal optimist said:

    I meant given the sample size. Of course Nichols would have more turnovers, he's made ~230 pass attempts to Strevelers 13. If you were to gross up Streveler's current stats (Nichols has 17 times more passing attempts than Streveler) his numbers are gaudy:

    153/221, 1,394 yards, 17 TDs,34 INTs.

    Of course this is based off his current small sample size, and by no means is this extrapolation perfect... feel free to provide a better argument than "Streveler because he's just better".

    I've never said that Streveler is better than Nichols... but on the other hand, I don't discount the possibility that he could be better than him... but I'm a firm believer in playing the best player, or, the player that gives us the best chance to win... unfortunately, I'm not the person who gets to actually evaluate and make that decision...

×
×
  • Create New...