Jump to content

JCon

Members
  • Posts

    15,582
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    271

Everything posted by JCon

  1. I saw them as matadors. As the bulls rushed past, they simply side-stepped them. Ole!
  2. They're really pushing the "scorched earth" policy.
  3. To be fair, our OL was the BEST at helping the QB up off the turf. Often, helping the QB to the sidelines or onto the cart. So much practice.
  4. And I'm fine with head shots being ejections. That might prevent the intentional and reckless hits. But, why can't that be reviewed by with video review, multiple angles? Also, this ref wouldn't call the Awe-Messam hit.
  5. Was Jeffcoat's an intentional head shot or simply a reckless hit?
  6. This isn't about prevention, it's about repercussions. It doesn't stop the head shot, just applies a penalty afterwards. Since that's the case, why not just let the eye in the sky, that can review multiple angles, do it. Does it change anyone's behaviour?
  7. I like his rant about Mueller not investigating the Democrats, which is not what the Special Counsel was tasked to do. But, his followers are stupid sheep, so, "BAAAAAAAAAA!!!"
  8. So, what will the Riders do with their increased net revenue? Will they cut (or maintain) prices for tickets/concessions?
  9. What problem? A call was missed. There are lots of calls botched every game but they haven't moved to improve the reffing. Now, they're adding a ref that's going to just watch for head shots to the QB? Come on, they're not improving anything and there are already 7 refs on the field and video review.
  10. Another incompetent ref on the field? Oh good. Ambrosie is really ruining the good will he had coming into the position. People are losing their jobs, they're apparently playing games in Mexico, the reffing is getting worse and Montreal and Toronto remain jokes but now we're going to put a ref on the field who's sole job is to look for head shots on the QB? Well, I guess they'll need to justify their existence and call a few. Maybe Halifax will get a team. That should improve the product and reffing.
  11. Yeah, if the Bombers aren't in it, Calgary will be. Should be able to move the tickets to Stamps fans, right?
  12. That's awesome. My mother will be over on Sunday morning. We can reminisce. I'll just put in on in the background.
  13. And I love Westerns. Completely oblivious.
  14. That looks great. Thanks, didn't know it was coming.
  15. The only way you could get decent buzz. They can totally play off the whole "toy" theme. Genius move.
  16. Pens have this winger, Kessel. He can score and he's a Stanley Cup winner. Leafs should go for him!
  17. Calgary is getting healthy. It's a much tougher game than it would have been had we played them last weekend, I feel.
  18. My very first game, July 5th, 1986. With my mother, a Rider fan, sitting in the lower East Side. Bombers 56 Riders 0.
  19. But would the Leafs prefer Buff over the D we would get? I'm not so sure. They're coming up against the cap soon and Buff's NMC kicks in next summer. That seems like lose-lose for the Leafs. I see you were suggesting Trouba. My mistake.
×
×
  • Create New...