Still wide open.  Teams are keying in on Matthews, Edwards doesn't seem to be on course for a good year so far with the early injury.

 

Will it be Denmark, Watson... Etienne?  Or is Matthews just that good that he becomes the leading receiver anyway?

 

Thoughts?

maybe Denmark will have a bounce back year. I don't think we are going to have a star receiver this year. I think its going to be getting a lot of it done by committee.

I can see Watson and Matthews being our 1000yrd recs this season. But I think It'll be Watson.

Denmark has been pretty involved the first couple games I think, wouldn't surprise me to see him have a good season... but I don't know who to pick as the leader... think it'll be spread out a fair bit.

I picked Watson....just a hunch. But if Watson is our leading receiver, we're not going to have a very good offense, I don't think.

as long as watson stays healthy... i think mathews still ends upbeing the leader..

Jay Detain

Jay Detain

 

who the ****

 

oh wait I get it.

Edited July 12, 201312 yr by Doctor Handsome

who the ****

 

oh wait I get it.

 

That's what the closed captioning guy calls him

Watson's been able to get open often the first 2 games, and Crowton's retooled offense seems to be geared towards getting his SB's open in space.  Just need the QB to get them the ball in stride... Watson's the best bet in my opinion.  Breakout season predicted.

I've had a good feeling about Denmark since he got here.  If not this year, it will be next year when he leads the team.

If teams keep bringing pressure it seems that Watson has become the safety valve and will get a lot of balls his way.

Watson getting a lot of love

I think Watson is going to be seeing a lot of balls in his face all year - Rod Black.

I've had a good feeling about Denmark since he got here.  If not this year, it will be next year when he leads the team.

Denmark is more likely to be off the team rather than leading the the team. Hes the definition of a mediocre to average player. Anyways, it has to be Matthews due to the fact that Edwards and Denmark aren't productive and Watson will always have injury concerns. 

Doesn't matter, we'll be lucky to even get a 1000 yard receiver this year.

Denmark is more likely to be off the team rather than leading the the team. Hes the definition of a mediocre to average player. Anyways, it has to be Matthews due to the fact that Edwards and Denmark aren't productive and Watson will always have injury concerns. 

 

Disagree... Denmark's been fairly solid and seems to be improving. He will be a very good receiver in this league, and there will be very little chance he ever goes to the NFL. If he manages to make the jump to Elite, he could be with us for a very long time.

With Crowton and this offence the leading receiver will be the ball boy at practice. There should be a minimum number to qualify in this category.

 

lol

It CAN be Watson, if we don;t over use him and he breaks again.

Disagree... Denmark's been fairly solid and seems to be improving. He will be a very good receiver in this league, and there will be very little chance he ever goes to the NFL. If he manages to make the jump to Elite, he could be with us for a very long time.

When has Denmark ever been more than average in his three years here? Even without the ratio, Cory Watson is a flat out better player than Denmark IMO.

When has Denmark ever been more than average in his three years here? Even without the ratio, Cory Watson is a flat out better player than Denmark IMO.

when he was the consensus runner up for rookie of the year in 2011.... He had a down year last year now we see if he bounces back this year, though moving outside won't get him as many passes from Pierce who only seems able to pass to the sbs with any regularity.

Is Denmark even still on this team anymore ?

I don't even notice him.

Is Denmark even still on this team anymore ?

I don't even notice him.

He only has 1 yard less than Matthews, and has more yards than TE. That is not bad considering he's a small target and our highly inaccurate QB with a questional mental aptitude can't hit the broad side of a barn, let a lone a small target like Denmark. Need a QB who can throw accurate, on time and lead his receiver, but all that would be asking a little much, we first need a QB that can find his open receivers on the field before he hits the turf.

He only has 1 yard less than Matthews, and has more yards than TE. That is not bad considering he's a small target and our highly inaccurate QB with a questional mental aptitude can't hit the broad side of a barn, let a lone a small target like Denmark. Need a QB who can throw accurate, on time and lead his receiver, but all that would be asking a little much, we first need a QB that can find his open receivers on the field before he hits the turf.

One less yard than Matthews...all I've heard all season is how Matthews has done sweet f all. That isn't exactly a ringing endorsement. He has four catches in three games, despite our horrible Quarterback play, that is still an issue.

One less yard than Matthews...all I've heard all season is how Matthews has done sweet f all. That isn't exactly a ringing endorsement. He has four catches in three games, despite our horrible Quarterback play, that is still an issue.

 well consider this though... only one receiver on the bombers has double digits in catches, that's Watson. Etienne and Matthews have 6 a piece. Denmark and Kohlert have 4, Edwards has 6 and anderson has 3. 

here's some other numbers... that's 43 for slotbacks, 10 for wide receivers and for comparison, 9 for runningbacks. Seems to me that Denmark not having a lot of catches is as much a case of the offense very heavily favouring the SBs over all other options.