Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Morning Big Blue

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

2014 CFL Draft blog

  • Replies 274
  • Views 30k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Any draft is going to drop off after the first round. Nobody can compare to a top prospect, it is just not possible. But that doesn't mean it gets shallow immediately thereafter.   My list I like up

  • No, that's Martin Short...

  • #32 Paul Brule. Cornerback & punt returner. Played with the Bombers from 1968 through 1972. There's a name from the past. Remember him very well. He returned punts back in the day when there was n

Featured Replies

 

Only posted my mock draft yesterday and I'm already starting to doubt it.

It could be a giant smokescreen but the interest Ottawa has in Quinn Smith seems to be very real. Could they take him 1st overall?

I read an article that suggested that may be a possibility. But I just can't see them passing on Lavertu. He is just a perfect fit, with their OL needs and the fact that Ottawa is going to want French players on their team. Drafting a Franco first overall will be great for relations with the French fans.

 

 

I have to agree that Lavertu would be a no-brainer fit for Ottawa, so does that mean it's Desjardins pick?

 

I would love to have Lavertu on our roster, but I'm starting to see the benefit of choosing Smith.

OShea pumping Quinn Smith's tires...  kind of looking like its coming down to Lavertu/Smith as the first two picks...

Except that it's Walters choice, not O'Shea's, on who they pick.

Except that it's Walters choice, not O'Shea's, on who they pick.

I suspect that O'Shea will have a strong voice in the choice, being as how he is the one to direct the team on the field.

Despite MOS's proclamation about his #1 having to suit up immediately I suspect he'll start selling that idea down once the guy arrives at camp, whomever it may be. Its basically the same old wishful thinking the Bomber braintrust has been guilty of for many years!

Except that it's Walters choice, not O'Shea's, on who they pick.

I suspect that O'Shea will have a strong voice in the choice, being as how he is the one to direct the team on the field.
Definitely O'Shea will have a lot of input but it is ultimately Walters' decision.

 

 

Except that it's Walters choice, not O'Shea's, on who they pick.

I suspect that O'Shea will have a strong voice in the choice, being as how he is the one to direct the team on the field.
Definitely O'Shea will have a lot of input but it is ultimately Walters' decision.

 

But Walters knows how badly and desperately his team needs a quality canadian hog. Problem made worse by the fact the 2 american imports they usually dress are borderline guys, certainly not dominant at their positions. (If you're gonna dress American OLs, just make sure they're monsters)

I feel pretty good knowing that we have a chance at either Quinn Smith or Pierre Lavertu. And as much as I don't Want Focault, he's still a good prospect who Bob Wylie can work with.

Interesting thoughts from Westwood from the BigShow this morning...

#2 overall for Riders Corey Watman (who backup Picard)

what's your thoughts about that?

Interesting thoughts from Westwood from the BigShow this morning...

#2 overall for Riders Corey Watman (who backup Picard)

what's your thoughts about that?

Isn't Watman a guard? We have enough guards. We need a centre.

 

Interesting thoughts from Westwood from the BigShow this morning...

#2 overall for Riders Corey Watman (who backup Picard)

what's your thoughts about that?

Isn't Watman a guard? We have enough guards. We need a centre.

 

 

I'm not sure of this but he was a backup center for the Riders.

 

http://www.riderville.com/depthchart/game/depthid/10073

depending on value there couldnt we make a different reade for Watman and still keep our #2?  Cant be that difficult to fleece Taman.

depending on value there couldnt we make a different reade for Watman and still keep our #2?  Cant be that difficult to fleece Taman.

 

a 3 year supply of napkins.

any westwood suggestion gets a huge no from me.

 

he was a darn kicker... and now just cuz he's on the radio doesnt make his opinions any more valid.

 

Loud mouth moron for sure.

 

Same guy who crapped on ladd for missing a game to be there with his wife.

 

Westwood is dead to me. 

Watman is a centre. Possible that the Riders would deal him.

#2 for watman straight up? no thanks.

 

#2 for watman sasks 8th and 2nd rounder that they got from us in the neufeld deal? id think about it.

 

But definitely not straight up.

 

We need canadian depth, if sask wants that pick bad enough, then they will have to offer more then just watman. 

#2 for watman straight up? no thanks.

#2 for watman sasks 8th and 2nd rounder that they got from us in the neufeld deal? id think about it.

But definitely not straight up.

We need canadian depth, if sask wants that pick bad enough, then they will have to offer more then just watman.

They traded the 2nd rounder they got from us to Hamilton.

 

#2 for watman straight up? no thanks.

#2 for watman sasks 8th and 2nd rounder that they got from us in the neufeld deal? id think about it.

But definitely not straight up.

We need canadian depth, if sask wants that pick bad enough, then they will have to offer more then just watman.

They traded the 2nd rounder they got from us to Hamilton.

 

oh right, the punter deal.. right. forget about that one. Then watman 8th and 18th then. 

#2 for watman straight up? no thanks.

 

#2 for watman sasks 8th and 2nd rounder that they got from us in the neufeld deal? id think about it.

 

But definitely not straight up.

 

We need canadian depth, if sask wants that pick bad enough, then they will have to offer more then just watman. 

 

That would be insane.  We need seven starting Canadians first.  Depth is a problem too, but you're not going to solve that in this draft.  Other than Lavertu, there is no interior OL prospect in this draft remotely near the quality of Watman.

 

I'd give up #2 in a flash to get Watman, I might ask for a one of Saskatchewan's picks other than their 1st, but if the Bombers really want that type of player coming out of this draft, that would be an easy trade to make.

 

I'm not sure the Riders would make that deal though.  Picard is coming to the end of the line, and there's no real need for the Riders to acquire the 2nd overall pick.  Watman is probably more valuable to them.

Huge Watman fan, I think it would be a good move. Already has a year under his belt, learning from an all-star and Grey Cup Championship team so he's not coming in raw. If you can get Lavertu, I am still taking him though.

 

#2 for watman straight up? no thanks.

 

#2 for watman sasks 8th and 2nd rounder that they got from us in the neufeld deal? id think about it.

 

But definitely not straight up.

 

We need canadian depth, if sask wants that pick bad enough, then they will have to offer more then just watman. 

 

That would be insane.  We need seven starting Canadians first.  Depth is a problem too, but you're not going to solve that in this draft.  Other than Lavertu, there is no interior OL prospect in this draft remotely near the quality of Watman.

 

I'd give up #2 in a flash to get Watman, I might ask for a one of Saskatchewan's picks other than their 1st, but if the Bombers really want that type of player coming out of this draft, that would be an easy trade to make.

 

I'm not sure the Riders would make that deal though.  Picard is coming to the end of the line, and there's no real need for the Riders to acquire the 2nd overall pick.  Watman is probably more valuable to them.

 

I guess what the Riders could do is take Smith to start rebuilding their Canadians on the dl, then take Goosen with their own pick to backup Picard.

Why would Taman get rid of his backup Centre?  Watman is not costing them big bucks and he will still get a good player at 8th

Sask has no need to trade up. Depth behind strength is what keeps teams on top, Taman isn't gonna make that move unless we screw up and offer something stupid.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.