wpgallday1960 Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 9 minutes ago, Tracker said: If you do not know how to tackle properly, you shouldn't be playing pro ball. Exactly. Hitting ZC anywhere between the knees and shoulders wouldn’t have been a problem. rkp 1
BRT Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 14 hours ago, 17to85 said: Ok so what the **** is Pokey supposed to do different? He's got multiple guys on him.and the ball is thrown to him and not ahead of him. I know you're a collaros apologist, but they weren't a receiver doing something wrong, they were balls they dbs had a chance at. The one before half especially shouldn't have been thrown. Situational awareness dictates a turnover is the worst case Ontario. And further to that.... collaros has thrown those exact same interceptions a million times this season. He's forcing plays without having the ability to put those balls where only the receiver can catch it. It's not a new thing I tend to agree with your comments. It would appear at least IMHO that Zach has lost some arm strength and is forcing plays. It does not help though that he is playing with the worse OL in front of him. I really can not say which O lineman I would keep next year. IMHO we are weak from tackle to tackle.
rkp Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago Zach was basically done when Bombers brought him in(werent teams not picking him up because of his issues with concussions).......and so what are the bombers doing with him now? Doesnt make much sense about his health. Tracker 1
HardCoreBlue Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 1 minute ago, rkp said: Zach was basically done when Bombers brought him in(werent teams not picking him up because of his issues with concussions).......and so what are the bombers doing with him now? Doesnt make much sense about his health. I’m sorry, what?
rkp Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 1 minute ago, HardCoreBlue said: I’m sorry, what? Didnt he have concussions issues when the bombers brought him in?
HardCoreBlue Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago Just now, rkp said: Didnt he have concussions issues when the bombers brought him in? Yup but he proved he wasn’t done when we picked him up. But he has somewhat regressed to date and with this latest injury the writing may be firmly on the wall to move on to the next phase of his life outside of playing football.
rkp Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago Zach has had issues with concussions dating back to 2014....in in sask he sat out 6 weeks due to a concussion 2018...Zach is living on borrowed time.....
Goalie Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 8 minutes ago, rkp said: Didnt he have concussions issues when the bombers brought him in? Concussions are weird. Sometimes you get cranked in the head so good you are out cold, other times you aren’t. I’ve had concussions as I played hockey and honestly the worst ones were the ones that I didn’t even think were bad. Now I played before we all knew about CTE but concussions are interesting. Sometimes the lightest smack to the head produced the worst concussion. The big shots like helmet coming off shots, made the ears ring but not the head. 4 minutes ago, rkp said: Zach has had issues with concussions dating back to 2014....in in sask he sat out 6 weeks due to a concussion 2018...Zach is living on borrowed time..... 2014 is 11 years ago. 2018 is 7 years ago. None of that matters in 2025. Living on borrowed time for 11 years now? OooooOooOoo K. Zach is still a capable QB but he’s being protected by the Taliban and Randolph. Seriously. We got 1 oline right now. It’s Randolph. The rest of the leaguers QBs protected by Team America (**** yeah) and we protected by the military they put together via posters and Facebook. It’s no wonder Zach hasn’t been hurt more. Count. It’s 1 2 and kaboom. Zach don’t even get 2 seconds to make a decision most the time. Edited 4 hours ago by Goalie
Booch Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 6 hours ago, JuranBoldenRules said: Breakdown and wrap at the waist. Guy wrapping the shoulder pads and bashing heads is going to tell us he’s making a form tackle? Yup...target mid section He didn't need to target the collar bone area 6 minutes ago, Goalie said: Concussions are weird. Sometimes you get cranked in the head so good you are out cold, other times you aren’t. I’ve had concussions as I played hockey and honestly the worst ones were the ones that I didn’t even think were bad. Now I played before we all knew about CTE but concussions are interesting. Sometimes the lightest smack to the head produced the worst concussion. The big shots like helmet coming off shots, made the ears ring but not the head. 2014 is 11 years ago. 2018 is 7 years ago. None of that matters in 2025. Living on borrowed time for 11 years now? OooooOooOoo K. Zach is still a capable QB but he’s being protected by the Taliban and Randolph. Seriously. We got 1 oline right now. It’s Randolph. U don't need to.be hit in the head directly to be concussed...that's probably why...its the sudden stop of the body and brain stays in motion and slams into skull.... HardCoreBlue and Bigblue204 2
rebusrankin Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago I suspend Reavis because it was a clear head shot and I feel those should come with harsh penalties so that we see less of them in games since CTE is serious. However one man's opinion. HardCoreBlue 1
Mark H. Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Deleted some bickering, while leaving relevant info intact Some good stuff here...do carry on...but not as you were Noeller 1
JuranBoldenRules Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 19 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: I suspend Reavis because it was a clear head shot and I feel those should come with harsh penalties so that we see less of them in games since CTE is serious. However one man's opinion. Well if they don't want QB's taking head shots seems like a pretty clear decision to make. But they also don't seem to care quite enough to take that step. rebusrankin 1
Bigblue204 Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Haven't read through the discussion so i dont know if this has been brought up. Does Hogan just doesn't believe in hot routes to beat a blitz? Middle of the field wide open every single blitz the riders sent and not once did anyone fill it. Thankfully BCs defense is as useless as the Bombers offense so they should be in the playoff picture all year. HardCoreBlue 1
Goalie Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Umm. Didn’t O’Shea have to challenge it even so yeah lol at the refs and league taking it seriously. Head shots against Zach seem to be taken the exact opposite way it should be. O’Shea had to challenge it. That right there is the biggest problem. Refs didn’t even call it. rebusrankin 1
HardCoreBlue Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 11 minutes ago, Mark H. said: Deleted some bickering, while leaving relevant info intact Some good stuff here...do carry on...but not as you were Yup feels like we’re starting to eat our own. The past five years have spoiled us. I’m sure Sasky fans are enjoying all of this but who cares they suck and will always suck. Amen. Noeller 1
Mark H. Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, HardCoreBlue said: I’m sure Sasky fans are enjoying all of this but who cares they suck and will always suck. Amen. I'm not sure if it's karma or crow...but it's not tasty.
HardCoreBlue Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 35 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: I suspend Reavis because it was a clear head shot and I feel those should come with harsh penalties so that we see less of them in games since CTE is serious. However one man's opinion. At the very least a fine. Tracker and rebusrankin 2
Noeller Posted 3 hours ago Author Report Posted 3 hours ago Just now, HardCoreBlue said: Yup feels like we’re starting to eat our own. The past five years have spoiled us. Absolutely... And it's so unfortunate that we've come to this. We weren't prepared to handle the winning and the inevitable dip in success.
HardCoreBlue Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 4 minutes ago, Mark H. said: I'm not sure if it's karma or crow...but it's not tasty. No not tasty at all, a bit bitter. Edited 3 hours ago by HardCoreBlue
Goalie Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago (edited) I kinda hope Calgary finishes 1st in west and we play Sask in the western semi final in Regina. I dunno. That I think might be fun. Then it doesn’t really matter what they did would it? I mean a win in Regina vs Sask would be phenomenal. I say I hope west semi cuz don’t want Sask even possibly repping the west via bye to west final. Sask winning here would be gut wrenching. Edited 3 hours ago by Goalie Mark H. 1
JuranBoldenRules Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 16 minutes ago, Bigblue204 said: Haven't read through the discussion so i dont know if this has been brought up. Does Hogan just doesn't believe in hot routes to beat a blitz? Middle of the field wide open every single blitz the riders sent and not once did anyone fill it. Thankfully BCs defense is as useless as the Bombers offense so they should be in the playoff picture all year. This has been an issue as long as Collaros has been here. He wants to take shots. Even on the plays he gets cranked and the second INT there's a guy on his read side with nobody within 10 yards of him. The hot routes are in the scheme. Mark H. 1
Mark H. Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Goalie said: I kinda hope Calgary finishes 1st in west and we play Sask in the western semi final in Regina. I dunno. That I think might be fun. I think Calgary will finish first. The Riders vs. Bombers Labour Day games could have easily been a split, in spite of all the warts. Bigblue204 and Noeller 2
Bigblue204 Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 1 hour ago, JuranBoldenRules said: This has been an issue as long as Collaros has been here. He wants to take shots. Even on the plays he gets cranked and the second INT there's a guy on his read side with nobody within 10 yards of him. The hot routes are in the scheme. Im not convinced they are. Never once was there a rec coming across the middle. I remember Demski specifically taking a play off and jogging a 10 yrd out. Collaros is on the ground and every rec is 20+ yards down field Edited 1 hour ago by Bigblue204
HardCoreBlue Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 14 minutes ago, Bigblue204 said: Im not convinced they are. Never once was there a rec coming across the middle. I remember Demski specifically taking a play off and jogging a 10 yrd out. Collaros is on the ground and every rec is 20+ yards down field It seems the closest we get to it is throwing a screen. Bigblue204 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now