JuranBoldenRules Posted Tuesday at 09:46 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 09:46 PM 58 minutes ago, 17to85 said: I don't think receivers are really the problem on this team. Qb and OL are where I see problems. Our receivers are great if they are wide-open. Schoen looks quite limited. Only guys that really fight through contact are Clercius and Demski. Easy to defend us. Kill the vertical stuff, force our receivers to make plays underneath and beat zone. We can't. SpeedFlex27 and Tracker 1 1
Booch Posted Tuesday at 10:03 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 10:03 PM (edited) 17 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said: Our receivers are great if they are wide-open. Schoen looks quite limited. Only guys that really fight through contact are Clercius and Demski. Easy to defend us. Kill the vertical stuff, force our receivers to make plays underneath and beat zone. We can't. I think that where Mitchell would help as opposed to Sterns....Sterns isnt really gonna be a deep threat contested ball guy, nor do I see him excelling at crossers in the mid to intermediate area...or really as the trusted second down conversion/chain mover guy....Clercius has that covered Mitchell would garner attention and stretch things out a bit...and not just over top stuff, and with Demski and Schoen working their bread and butter prob leave Wheatfall with a lot of man to man stuff....Mitchell has the potential...and history of breaking stuff from anywhere....Don't really see that with Sterns....he's kind of just out there...and redundant....we need a twitchy/ burner type or a bigger physical guy who can win battles in contested situations and help in run game...Sterns does neither said all along too...Banking on Schoen as being the game breaker and your A1 guy again was a fools game barely a yr from ACL reconstruction. And paying him as such...which thankfully we are not would also been as about as dumb as re-upping ZC before seeing a good 6-8 games outta him Edited Tuesday at 10:06 PM by Booch SpeedFlex27 1
17to85 Posted Tuesday at 10:09 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 10:09 PM 22 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said: Easy to defend us. Kill the vertical stuff, force our receivers to make plays underneath and beat zone. We can't Yeah but collaros also sucks at the underneath passing game....
Eternal optimist Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago On 2025-07-05 at 12:09 PM, rebusrankin said: Zach was decent against BC, Great against Edmonton and lousy versus Calgary. Its concerning because we saw a lot of this last year. ZC has never looked the same since that neck injury against the Elks in EDM a few years ago. Booch and BigBlueFanatic 1 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now