Jesse

This is just awful football.

That’s not defending the Riders, lol. They cut a **** QB that burned all bridges in the end.

This is exactly how I expected this game to go. People thinking one of these teams are going to upset Toronto are nuts.

Really? He shouldn't have been starting at any point this season.

If he's healthy he absolutely does. And they mix Mills in quite a bit too. Nothing wrong with their run game except for the fact that they lean away from it too much these days.

Pathetic fanbase. I appreciate an organization pricing to the market. Wish the Jets would do the same.

I personally don't like when they treat the coach award as a "most improved".

I think Dinwiddie will win Coach, but Brady still takes MOP.

It's the advantage of having vets that have all been together for multiple years. For all the negative things we bring up about guys who have been around too long, there are positives too.

Let's not forget his 500 receiving yards and league leading 13 TDs.

Strev was also released from his contract on an injury settlement. And he wasn't exactly effective in any of his regular season performances.

Seems weird for me to hear posters say TO isn't that good because they only had to beat down on lesser Eastern competition all year, but now predict that those lesser teams are now capable of beating TO. Any given Sunday, etc. But there is no real reason to think TO isn't going to sleep walk their way to the GC.

You read that on Facebook comments or what?

He clearly thinks Zach should have been our MOP vote and this is his "I'm smarter than Winnipeg voters" commentary.

I've said it already, you can make any contract fit, but does it make your team better? You've just replaced 4 vets with rookies and committed to not adding anyone via FA. Not saying you're wrong, but When Walters adds up all the different scenarios, is that the one that makes the team the best version of itself?

I wouldn't be shocked, but Calgary is really, really bad guys. BC should still wipe the floor with them.

Not if he only threw 23 TDs.

You can make any contract fit if you want to, the question becomes does it make the team better. Having 600k tied to 2 receivers will limit the team in other areas. Even if you manage to sneak some of the cap hit into the 2023 year. I'm sure they have a few different scenarios plotted out. It's a matter of deciding which one results in the best team overall.

1. It's objectively dumb, but I love when teams reach deep into the rule books and exploit random junk like this. I expect the rule to be changed in the off season so the kick has to travel at least 10 yards. 2. When have we ever brought in Dru to spark the offence? This is Zach's team. Zero chance. 3. I would prefer Strev as a 1b to Zach, as he is a guy you can throw out there to run his package. Dru is the guy you want if Zach is going to miss a game, but Strev is the guy you want playing with Zach.

The weird things some people do with their votes. smh.

I can't name a team that's overly invested in a QB. Every team has played at least 2 guys this year trying to find some success.

Even if Strev was gonna come back to the CFL as a #2 or 1b, we’re not really positioned to do it. Spending 600+ on Zach doesn’t leave a lot for the rest of the QB room.

He only throws 4 yards at a time. Ricky Ray and Dave Dickenson, he ain't.

I'm coming from the perspective of, we're likely to be heading for our 4th consecutive Grey Cup appearance and you're gonna go with an unproven starter at QB? Bailing on the guy who dragged you to each one?

Money aside, can Zach tell Dru with 100% confidence that he’s going to retire in 2 years? He’s already made that decision? And even if that was a guarantee, Dru would just stagnate in the bench and this point. He needs his next challenge if he wants to keep growing.