Goalie

Yeah. Right... the other way around. BC has montreals First. Well, forget that then

How about.. To Toronto : Drew Willy To Winnipeg: Glenn plus BC's first from Montreal To Montreal: I have no friggin clue lol

We'd need a veteran back up qb coming back to us for sure. Montreal makes sense with Glenn, can "finish" his career where had his most success.

Trump and Vince Mcmahon are good friends. Trump and Vince both agree that any publicity is good publicity. And Trump and Vince might be right because nobody is talking about Hillary... they are talking about Trump. Good or Bad.... his name is out there every day. Plus the one thing he has that Hillary will never have is the fact that he's not a career politician. I don't think trump will win... I hope he doesn't I should say but it wouldn't surprise me if he does

All of it happened. Jets have no interest in Crouse.

WWE Legend Mr Fuji dies at the age of 82 this morning

Dano is better than Crouse. It's not close. You can say what you want but if the Jets wanted Crouse instead of Dano they'd have made the deal with Florida instead

Ya. Not even close. Dano is the better player by far. I feel this has to be a troll post from you tho

Get Dressler and Smith back. I think that might help. I don't think you necessarily need a big huge receiver to do jump balls .... I think having a couple guys tho who can make people miss helps. Wonder if running a swing pass to a guy like McDuffie might work.

Very 2011 ish in my opinion so far. I guess the 1 thing I'll say about the O is... sure would be nice to see what they can do with dressler smith Denmark Mayo and Kohlert. Guess that might be playing a bit of a role right now also in terms of lack of O production. Starting a couple rookie receivers every week right so will be interesting to see what happens when dressler and smith are healthy

I'm not even just talking about last night tho. Our D is averaging like 5 turnovers a game the last 4 games. Ya montreal has a very good D but when you begin 3 drives inside the Montreal 35 pretty much and come away with 3 fgs.... that's not very good O production. Even 1 touchdown there would have made a difference. Gotta make teams pay for their mistakes with TDS. And no... I know there's another team on the field.... I mean Cmon I've watched for 20 years now.... Bombers need to be better in the red zone. Need more tds Did you know that mo Leggett has 3 pick 6 tds and No bomber receiver has 3. That's an issue. Need more production from the O. Most nights 1 td a game won't do it

So now there's not only positrons and negatrons but willy mavens and Nichols lovers I guess ?? Perhaps it's just me but I don't really give a crap who the qb is... it's irrelevant.... I don't know why pointing out flaws is considered hating Nichols and loving Willy. It's not about Nichols or Willy. It's about winning a game. Yeah they have done that 4 times in a row now but if you aren't winning when your D is forcing huge amounts of turnovers you have problems. It's great that we are winning but make no mistake about it.... it's 99 percent on the backs of our D and special teams. 6 turnovers and we win by what? 14? Should be winning by double that getting 6 turnovers a game and I get that's it's not all on the qb.

Fun fact: Jets were offered Crouse and Florida 1st for Ladd... said no. At the 2016 draft b4 trading pick 22 and 36 to Philly for pick 18 and the 3rd Rd pick... Florida offered Crouse for pick 22. Jets said No again. Crouse probably not as good as some think he will be. Pretty average player. Probably 3rd liner at best

And stafford and Lemieux lol. Stafford is RW. Sucks on the left. Lemieux is LW

You missed the point. Point being.... Nichols has been very average the last couple 3 games now. Very very average. That's enough right now. He's also had games where the other team should have more interceptions but has dropped them. Bottom line.. the D and special teams had 6 takeaways... just like the week b4 the bye and we won by what? 14 points both games.... the O is not doing enough. What the D and Special teams are doing is not sustainable. Eventually you need the O to put up more than 1 touchdown a game

Perfect example of why you don't ever lay off an opponent. Esks layed off. It almost cost them. The game wasn't as close as the score In my opinion if you can win 70 to nothing then you win 70 nothing. You don't lay off cuz you have a lead.

Might be more frustration from a guy who is closer to the end of his career realizing that perhaps his team just isn't very good. I mean it's one thing to be called for unnecessary roughness right but to get the other penalty from yapping 2 much? How you justify that. Also he should have a talk with his buddy chip cox sucker about unnecessary roughness calls. 2 vets costing the als significant field position on a critical drive

With the way our D and special teams are playing right now... Willy Nichols Davis Bennett... irrelevant in my opinion. The QB and O are not winning games. The D and Special Teams are

20 fgs in a row. Bomber Record

Never bet against Harris.

Thought he dove st him inbounds. Those calls are iffy in my opinion. I mean ya it was late but loffler was inbounds when he jumped at him. Carter might have been also

I actually can't believe how bad the riders really are. The shine is coming off Chris Jones and John Murphy quite rapidly

Harris had well over 100 yards combined tonight. Dude was in beast mode. 2 fumbles? Sure but also the dagger at the end. Gonna give an Honorable mention or HM lol to Johnny Adams who totally shut down Duron Carter

I have to mention Johnny Adams who basically, as in totally shut down Duron Carter

Lol. Yeah. Be better for bombers if sask won but since that's not going to happen.... I agree lol