Jump to content

Jaxon

Members
  • Posts

    443
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Jaxon

  1. 2 minutes ago, JCon said:

    How many Bomber FAs did the Bombers try to re-sign though?

    Westerman, for sure but who else? Heath?

     I don't have inside info, but I'm sure they would have put an offer in front of Bond, Heath, Normand, Thomas and Westerman.    Clearly not enough to get it done, but I don't believe they would have said "off you go" without some kind of offer.   They may have said "we don't see you in our future" to Denmark, JFG, Hurl, and Knox,   although they may have made a specialty team offer to Hurl with a significant pay cut.

  2. I find it interesting.   Here we are several hours after the start, and none of the Bomber free agents have signed elsewhere as yet.    Yes there are rumours, and yes some likely will, but I suspect that the money isn't much greater than what they may have been offered here.   Either that or they are trying to get the Bombers to match what they are being offered because perhaps it's not so bad here.

  3. 1 minute ago, Blueandgold said:

    You wouldn't think  so. But, Canadians do make a surprising amount of money. 

    I'm happy to have him though. He can easily be the best Canadian receiver we've had in 20 years.

    He has the potential to be the top Canadian receiver we've had in a while, but I wouldn't say it will be easy.  Lots of hard work ahead.

    I'm not surprised at the salary rumour.   The majority of the dollars go to the QB's and then the starting Canadians.    It's all about supply and demand.

  4. 1 minute ago, BomberBall said:

    wWMb4vSv_bigger.jpg Darrin Bauming @DarrinBauming 21m21 minutes ago

     
     

    Darrin Bauming Retweeted Farhan Lalji

    I get the feeling this is the type of payout Jamaal Westerman is looking for as an impact starting Canadian D-lineman. Winnipeg had a strong offer on the table, and Westerman passed.

     

         Farhan LaljiVerified account @FarhanLaljiTSN
          Around 200k for Ted Laurent on a 2 year deal. Could hit 220k with incentives. @cfl @CFLonTSN #CFLFA18
     
     
     
     
     
     

    The Laurent contract certainly sets a high bar that other NI d-line players will measure themselves against.   Against that, it does take a lot of cap space off of the table.

  5. 2 minutes ago, Booch said:

    and with Durant pretty sure we are going to see it more and be very successful...to the point where we could see Durant in for 3..4..5..plays in a row or until a team takes a timeout...there is a stoppage in play or they pull a phantom injury ala the Riders

    I agree.   The other advantage is that is does give your #2 or  #3 QB some snaps and playing time which is always good should they be required to step up at a later time, plus it gives your #1 a bit of a break.

     

  6. 13 hours ago, JCon said:

    LeFevour was great in short yardage. Automatic or at least it seemed that way. 

    It was the following play, on first down, when they left him out there, when they didn't seem to move the ball. That left Nicholls with second and long. 

    I really liked the concept.  You go "JUMBO" for the 3rd down play and the defence does the same, then you go no huddle, and catch them with their big guys on the field and you stretch the field either by going option or going deep.   If the defence doesn't beef up, it makes your 3rd down play a higher percentage play.   If they do, you may be able to catch them ill prepared on the following play.

    You are correct though, that the execution wasn't as successful as we  would have hoped.    I still like the concept though.  

  7. 3 hours ago, Noeller said:

    WOW!  ....and for a sack of beans, no less. That's really interesting. I guess the guy is 34 and has 10 years of wear and tear on the tires...

    When I first saw the news, it didn't include what went the other way.   When I heard it was a swap of 4th rounders plus a future 4th round pick, I thought that was really cheap for a guy who has dominated at his position.   Even given his age, he showed this year that he can still play.   I wonder if the Stamps asked him to retire and he declined?   Seems odd for a guy of his stature.    

  8. IMHO, Vince McMahon's biggest problem going forward is making the jump from "sports entertainment" to competitive sports.    Rightly or wrongly, he is the king of fake sports.  Yes, it's a show, some may find  entertaining, but I'm not sure that it's a brand that is compatible with competitive sports.    Trying to change the impression of a brand is a tough marketing job.   I don't believe that national sponsors are lining up in droves to have their brand associated with "fake sports", even if this league is real.

    Secondly, the NFL, even with all of it's flaws and problems, is the big dog.   I'm not convinced that there is much market in the US for second tier football.     The professional sports market is saturated with NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, and a growing MLS.     After that, there is the college sports phenom.      And yes, I know that there is minor league baseball, arena football, AHL hockey and the like, but none of them get national attention.   They have some local interest in their own smaller markets, and survive on ticket sales, or support for being a farm team to a big league club.   They offer nothing on the national scale that McMahon is looking for.   All the hoopla in the world won't create a  long term national audience for the XFL.   

  9. 1 hour ago, mbrg said:

    Couldn't help but notice a lot of things on this list would also show up on a list about Milt Stegall.  Drop the dates and switch Buffalo to Green Bay...

    Of course there's no point in making that simple observation, cause now someone will have to lose their turds that a rookie running back was compared to Milton J Stegall.  Who, as I recall, tried to get back into the NFL three times after initially joining the Bombers.

    True, there are many CFLer's including Milt that should have but didn't get a decent shot at the NFL.   I don't fault anyone for chasing their dream.   I just think that his chances there are slim, and I don't think his tactics will be successful.  IMHO, he'd be better off playing the year for the Argos and then taking his shot.

     

  10. I think Wilder is a good player but....

    1.  He went undrafted coming out of college.   He has a pedigree name, and went to a big school (Florida State) so many teams would have looked and passed.

    2.  He previously had 2 NFL shots  Cincinnati in 2014-2015 and Buffalo in 2016.    They evaluated him and neither kept him around.

    3.  I have to believe that his NFL interest is still very limited at this point.    I don't think that a good half season in the CFL would make NFL scouts go crazy for him.   I'm sure they are prepared to "bring him to camp and lets have a look", but he won't be a top priority for them.     

    4.  Teams in both leagues shy away from "holdout" players.   Some teams more than others, but any way you look at it, it will diminish his market.

    Having said all that, I'm old.   I played amateur football in the '70's, but never pro.  I stopped playing when I was in university because I decided to concentrate on academics, so I can appreciate a man needing to do what he needs to do to support his family.     I've often looked back and wondered if I should have played longer.     If anyone can arrange it, I'd I'd gladly pay  50K to have his talent for a year so that I could play.   If you're only doing it for the money and not for the love of the game, I'm not sure that you will have much of a career.

     

  11. The only rule changes that I would suggest are

    1.   adding of a second challenge if the coach wins the first one.   It seems strange that a coach may have to burn his challenge to correct a officials error, but then doesn't have that opportunity later.   I would off-set this with a 10 yard penalty for an unsuccessful challenge to help prevent the "fishing" flags.

    2.  Increase the mandatory plays off for injury delays.    1st time a player goes down (requiring assistance leaving the field) he is out for 3 plays (same as it is now)   2nd time the same player goes down, he's out for 10 plays.   3rd time, he's done for the day.   I believe that this will make it tougher for coaches to implement the fake kneel to slow down the game, while still allowing players needing medical assistance to get some help.

  12. On 12/11/2017 at 9:03 AM, Mark H. said:

    Ok, a Canadian team in the Stanley Cup finals would be an issue - once in 10 to 15 seasons, same with the Blue Jays in the World Series. However, what the about annual drop in attendance due to late fall / early winter weather conditions? Not the Grey Cup but the semis and the final. 

    I think you see that same drop from August to October for the fair weather fans.

×
×
  • Create New...