-
Posts
7,823 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Articles
Everything posted by Bigblue204
-
Cannabis, Pot, Reefer, & Marijuana
Bigblue204 replied to TrueBlue4ever's topic in General Discussion
It's not a racial term. It was first used as a reference to cannabis to confuse the public because it sounded foreign (specifically Mexican) and used in racial propaganda. "Marijuana makes black men rape white women". This is not a theory, you can find the ads/warnings today. No one is suppressing anything lol. Jesus christ get off the soap box. It's just not a correct term. That's it. That's all. Laws or not, it's not what it is. Marijuana is one plant....cannabis is another. How they came to mean the same thing is based on propaganda and racism. I was giving you a history lesson. No need to get your panties in a bunch. -
Cannabis, Pot, Reefer, & Marijuana
Bigblue204 replied to TrueBlue4ever's topic in General Discussion
Yeah thats not what I meant. It was used due to its "foreign" sound back in the 1930s. There were literal ads talking about a new drug "Marijuana" and how it was making black and Hispanic men want to rape and kill white women. If they said it was cannabis, prohibition would have never happened, as it was used medically for many different reasons....and hemp was the major crop at the time....so instead they used Marijuana the scary drug from Mexico. Anyways, I don't hold any ill will towards people who say/use Marijuana. I just like to let it be known that's not what it's called. There's no reason to not call it cannabis, and there are reasons to stop calling it Marijuana. That's all. -
Cannabis, Pot, Reefer, & Marijuana
Bigblue204 replied to TrueBlue4ever's topic in General Discussion
I know. But it Doesn't mean it's correct. -
Cannabis, Pot, Reefer, & Marijuana
Bigblue204 replied to TrueBlue4ever's topic in General Discussion
Youre right it does evolve. Which is why its evolved from Marijuana to Cannabis. Which is why it's called the Cannabis Act. The cannabis store etc. No one in the industry says Marijuana. Even in law enforcement it's referred to as cannabis. There's also a healthy dose of racism behind the use of Marijuana. -
Cannabis, Pot, Reefer, & Marijuana
Bigblue204 replied to TrueBlue4ever's topic in General Discussion
One more thing before I go. During Grey cup week, the entire team was talked to about their cannabis use. As in they kept walking into meetings smelling like pot. So if for whatever brain dead reason you think there is only a hand full of users on any given football team (NFL or CFL) I'd invite you to start living in the 21st century. -
Cannabis, Pot, Reefer, & Marijuana
Bigblue204 replied to TrueBlue4ever's topic in General Discussion
This response will be joined to my earlier one I'm guessing but.... First. It's not Marijuana. It's Cannabis. Marijuana is a plant found in Mexico that is very similar to tobacco. People started using Marijuana to confuse farmers in the 1930(ish) so they wouldn't realize they were actually voting to make their hemp crops illegal. Also claims about potency going from 3-4% to 25-30% is hilarious and factually incorrect. Yes cannabis is more potent today than in the 60s. But to claim it was only 3% back when they didn't have tech to actually test is a funny take. Also without getting into details of how the plant grows and actually accumulates cannabinoids (THCA, CBDA etc) what most people get today in store is closer to 15-20%. Testing is not in anyway an exact science. And every flower bud will have a different potency than the next, even from the same plant. Only very rarely will you see 30% plus potency....and even then to say the entire plant holds that....is questionable at best. Companies often send out their best product to be tested, it is 100% not reliable. In terms of privacy, I'm sure Lawler will be fine with me talking about him on here....you know due to him taking multiple photos with staff that were solely for the purpose of social media. Jefferson also posted a video in his private residence where a small Bong was seen. So please Get off your high (no pun intended) horse. You're credentials etc aside. I can tell you do not actually understand the plant and what it does/doesn't do. So please feel free to message me if you'd like a more thorough education. Calm your **** Catan. No one cares. -
Cannabis, Pot, Reefer, & Marijuana
Bigblue204 replied to TrueBlue4ever's topic in General Discussion
It's 2021 man. Lawler is a stoner....but hes 100% not the only one. If you dont think Jefferson is a reliable athlete well...im not sure what youve been watching. Sounds like you could use some education on how cannabis impacts the body. Hint....everything that was traditionally taught about pot is actually only true for alcohol. -
2022 Off Season - Back 2 Back Champs Edition
Bigblue204 replied to Noeller's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Also another fun fact I found out...which isn't surprising because I saw him my companies store a few times...but Lawler is a massive pot head. Which just makes me like him even more -
2022 Off Season - Back 2 Back Champs Edition
Bigblue204 replied to Noeller's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
I've heard that Eli won't be back. Apparently guys where pretty disappointed with him and there has been little to no contact since the WF. It's too bad, really talented guy. Who I thought they'd bring back regardless of vax status. But looks like both parties are moving on. -
It's basically impossible to say either way right now with all the free agents. Every team COULD look very different come June.
-
2022 Off Season - Back 2 Back Champs Edition
Bigblue204 replied to Noeller's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Dobson I think is the name -
2022 Off Season - Back 2 Back Champs Edition
Bigblue204 replied to Noeller's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Semantics aside. You CAN'T be clutch if you don't get it done. -
2022 Off Season - Back 2 Back Champs Edition
Bigblue204 replied to Noeller's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
The bolded part is the most important part of your point. Almost does not = clutch. -
I'm pretty sure it was Pruneau who called him out after he left Ottawa for pointing fingers at everyone but himself when things went wrong. And the Dlineman who played for edm (name escapes right now) and now plays for the Als complained more about his play style than personality.....but even that is telling a bit. He did walk it back once Harris joined the Als...but where's there's smoke... And of course the medical issue that mysteriously disappeared allowing him to get vaccinated. Add on his age and cost and I fail to see the upside.
-
I think Tui is brought back regardless of vaxx status. I honestly believe he is that good. Also there is a slight chance that vaxx requirements drop by then (I'm not betting on it so calm your ****, I'm just saying there's a chance!). I'm more concerned about Dline and Dbs leaving than anything else.
-
2021 Grey Cup GDT - Bombers vs. Tiger-Cats
Bigblue204 replied to TrueBlue4ever's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
I remember seeing that live and thinking there is no way this ball is going to Wally after they had that chat. Didn't realize he drew that much coverage though. -
2022 Off Season - Back 2 Back Champs Edition
Bigblue204 replied to Noeller's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
The QB doesn't dress, that is right. But ANOTHER player does, and they get paid a game check. If I remember correctly the CFLPA was in favour of that change because it helped spread the money around on game day and didn't give it to someone who barely (if ever) plays a down. I'm not talking about changing downs/coaches etc. I'm talking about how the 3rd QB rule DOES NOTHING to save money. They money is still spent, just on other players...which was the original purpose of it happening (I'll try and find the article that talks about it) Also the rule change is in the CBA which means the CLFPA HAD to agree to it.