Brandon

This is 100% bull ****, rumours for Glenn were always for a 1st rounder. Also if this was true why didn't Lawless bring this to light during the off season... this kind of material would of been gold for him to rip apart Mack. I'm calling 100% bs on this rumour and it's purely just crap that he's trying to throw around. Also Burke has been non stop pumping Pierce's tires and saying he's the greatest... if Burke was honest to a fault then he wouldn't of danced around when Irving questioned him during the first 3 losses on questions about the offense stinking and Buck looking bad. Burke big time was the reason Pierce is back. Max Hall = Crowton because of the previous connection and Mack = Goltz because it's his recruit.

The whole Goltz needs time to develop really makes the coaches look ridiculous... 3rd year in and it's still to early for him to start?

I agree, he didn't look all that bad in the game. He had 2 - 3 god awful drops which killed drives and really killed any sort of momentum. The balls were being thrown where they should be and had decent zip to them. My only criticisms of his play was maybe throwing a few balls when he shouldn't have because of high risk. He was definitely much better then Pierce that's for sure. Much quicker , actually checked down on his 2nd - 3rd reads, tossed the ball away rather then getting sacked.... I agree with 17 .... Bucko should be 3rd while Goltz should be 2nd and Hall should be only playing for evaluation purposes.

How so? Marcel clearly said he was called up 48 hours ago, so clearly it was Miller. I see no contradictions here what so ever.

Agreed, for MB he knows next year will be a brand new regime so why would he take off before seeing who gets hired and what not. I just hope they do an extensive HC interview process and don't simply hand him the team out of convenience.

Him being cut by two teams in a year is a red flag...

I feel bad for Marcel, on the free press they have a video of him being questioned and the media were all over him asking if he made the decision for Hall, if he's going to coach on the sidelines , what he has recommended so far. All this despite him saying he was only called 48 hours ago and has only watched film in one day. At least give the guy a few weeks before hounding him...

What's wrong with Palardy? Is he hurt?

Saw this on the other site and no.

How can they evaluate Hall if he's stuck on the bench. Great move!

Qft this thread is nearly as whiney as riderfans after losing a game

Funny thing is that if Cortez had even an average defense in Hamilton... they would of been the top team in the league by a mile... that offense put up stupid numbers.

My guess is that they want to evaluate who they have and it's hard to evaluate Max Hall if he hasn't played in game at all. I'm pretty sure Miller and the rest of the Blue realize that this season is a write off and they are trying to salvage or figure out what they can do with who they have. I have no problems with them playing Hall and I don't take much from people saying a qb is god awful in practice. To many times we seen guys who absolutely rocked in practice only for them to be god awful once in game. We did the same thing last season and this is how we found out that Alex Brink really didn't have what it takes to win and it helped them move on from him.

Calgary would never trade Mitchell and I highly doubt the Riders are going to get rid of Willy... Maybe the Blue can trade for Elliott lol! Because aside Tate I think it's pretty slim pickings. Maybe Collaros if they are lucky....

We didn't run Glenn out of town, that was Kelly's decision completely. We were disappointed with Glenn mainly because he would play scared after getting hit a few times... we also at that point had Khari Jones before him so we were accustomed to good qb'ing. Since then the only QB we've had that could up good stats is friggin Steven Jyles.... Calvillo is looking bad this year at the age of 42 .... Buck has been looking bad 3 years in a row and he's 10 years younger....

FYI crowtob was lapolices boy. I also like how people want change but freak out when it does and get paranoid that the club night do something.

But Buck has zero strengths, Goltz is way more agile and has a stronger arm.

Or to take over the job hmmmmm

But Burke has been doing this all along, Mack wanted Buck gone, coaching staff wanted Buck to stay because he gave then the beat chance to win. Coaching staff wanted Elliott gone. If Burke wanted what was best for the club he would of had Elliott or Goltz be our starter and let them get more experience in game action. The only time anyone aside pierce got any playing time was when Buck would get hurt. So this whole must win now mandate has been going on since they traded Jules.

The drastic changes needed are with the coaching staff,

Wrong Sinopoli is the 4th qb.

I'm basically suggesting to have Tate take Bucks spot on the roster. We keep Goltz playing and if he stinks the joint up I'd way rather have Tate go in then Buck. They are equally injury proned however Tate has looked fantastic when he does play while Buck has been the worst qb in the league. I'm not saying put all eggs on Tate, suggesting we bring him in to get some wins this year and maybe in the future he can be our Kevin Glenn.

This is a good start, someone with cfl experience that can help out. Is he going to consult with the offense or as a gm?

So I'm going to assume the fans are ok with writing off this year then?

With his more turnovers, less point production and lower qb rating? Despite being nine year vet. If Goltz can reach that level of production in only two starts then clearly his ceiling is way higher. If Buck with healthy receivers can only be marginally better as you claim then why not stick with Goltz?