Jump to content

Zontar

Members
  • Posts

    2,905
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Zontar

  1. Quibbles. Everything you said about Austin's CFL cred can be said about Milanovich but I doubt anyone would say that too. It was Creehan that did most of the alienating here not Cortez. Creehan lost the defense in training camp and never got it back. As a result it infected the whole team. More than one player has commented how it has been like night and day compared to last year. Gable will be starting. Not as fast as Walker but a better pass catcher and blocker. Burris ' steady decline ? His only real bad year was 2011 bookended by great years. If you can demonstrate how he's so much less mobile I'd be interested in seeing it. (as opposed to just saying it) IMO you're underrating Bulcke who will be starting. Overstating Williams only to knock him down ? Austin said he would probably be a rotational guy. Who are the "people" that are picking HAM to challenge for first ? All I've seen is third or last, not that it matters. Not a bad summation, a few straw-man arguments though.
  2. Didnt say media "hated" Mack for his record. They criticize him for his chronic lack of availability.
  3. Clip and save this so we dont have any "things woulda been different if the league didn't force us to stay in the East" down the road.
  4. People are saying Mack is an awful person ? Not sure its an argument that actually exists. Generalizing but it boils down to two things. 1. Fans have a problem with him over his failure or perceived failure to improve the team. 2. Media has a problem with him because over the majority of his tenure he has made himself unavailable or unhelpfull. They also have no choice but to report on the lack of success. Both, generally, are fair game.
  5. That would be HAM. Cut in favour of Garret McIntyre.
  6. So you're realy not ignoring . Right back where we started. ZZZ
  7. Again, how would you know if you ignored ? If you're actively looking for things to be annoyed at and the hissy fits that come after that isnt my problem.
  8. Silly. There is an ignore function, right ? You're under no obligation to even read what I post nevermind agree or disagree.
  9. That's reasonable. Not saying there's nothing there with Goltz . Thurs. was just a snapshot with obvious midigating factors but nevertheless did not look great.
  10. Wasn't Jameze Massey the guy who called himself "Mr. Excitement" ?
  11. Its relevent because I'm the only one who actually saw the game.
  12. Saw the entire game. Goltz moved the ball at times with safe underneath routes, his few deep passes were incompletes. But what few good things he did were wiped out by mental mistakes. So what you're left with is a project QB , at this point, that's less effective than Elliott or Brink.
  13. Adding yet another QB that wont help you isnt a plan, its' just Spin the Wheel of QBs Mack has been playing for awhile now.
  14. Stadium looked pretty good on TV, tiny and old-timey but very tidy .Much like the Moncton games.
  15. True, Goltz isnt at the same experience level yet. Clement looked very fast but him and Hall were pretty unremarkable - again see no diff. with Elliot or Brink.
  16. It was hard for me to watch at times too. Knowing what calibre of player WPG sent and the meaningless-ness of ex. games at the best of times. Goltz : A fine physical specimen but didnt see what made him superior over Elliot or Brink.
  17. Managed to watch recording of game. For every one good Goltz play he made a boneheaded mental mistake - pick for a TD was extremely weak. In other words he's a rookie and a work in progress. If that's what the org. has settled on for the inevitible Pierce injury then Bomber fans have got to lower expectations and be prepared for losses.
  18. Sorry, dudes, I'll be working. They're not streaming it live ?
  19. With the calibre of people they get for these things bias would be the least of your worries.
  20. The decline in the fortunes of TJH has been rapid.
×
×
  • Create New...