Mark H.
Moderators
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Mark H.
-
JBR - did the protection scheme look similar to what Trestman used to run with Calvillo?
-
NFL rule: any player may advance and/or recover the ball after a fumble http://www.nfl.com/rulebook/fumble
-
Adams touching the ball is what allowed the Calgary player to recover it.
-
It may be that - you never can tell with trash talk
-
-
-
-
The End.
-
There's some truth to that - almost cost Calgary a win
-
Moe Leggett is ready and waiting
-
Book it
-
Did some digging - No yards does not apply on a dribbled ball. They made the correct call. https://cfldb.ca/rulebook/kicking/kick-from-scrimmage-and-open-field-kick/
-
-
Same D we've seen all year. They give up a ton of yardage but get turnovers - I was impressed that they almost won a game where they generated just one turnover (should have been two)
-
Hmmm getting a tad interesting...
-
Not a theory at all, that's the rule for a dribbled ball, which is what the call was. You have to be onside in order to recover a dribbled ball, which was negated when Adams touched it
-
If he hadn't touched it, it would have been no yards. The players who recovers for the 'dribbling team' has to be onside.
-
The truth is it looks like several other starts minus the turnovers
-
Not much Messam so far - they are stopping him
-
Giving up yards as usual - Stamps not likely to turn it over.
-
Oh indeed - there's a sucker born every minute - and a Bomber team to take him.
-
They were never going to cancel it. If they were, it would have been a bigger in McFad's last election.
-
That is a big fat maybe. Most CFL offenses move the ball when they're pinned deep. I'll go with the 45+ kicker every day of the week, and I dare say so would you.
-
Still very different IMO
-
The Bombers D gives up the yards and forces turnovers. They do tend to give up significant YAC, hope they can tighten that up.
