Mark H.

OL is exactly the place to start, it should be the last position that gets sacrificed. Teams that start 3 national OL do so because they have adequate talent to fill those positions. Ask yourself this question: how many games do we win without Matt Nichols in the line up? The answer is pretty simple. When the left side of your OL is the best in the league and your QB is a pocket passer, you keep it that way. If the Bombers had fielded the kind of OL that Edmonton and BC did this year, it would have been a disaster.

Sign Bond if possible and start two Canadian receivers in order to get an American MLB on the field OL > Receiver There's your summary of the past week - cheers

I suspect you'd get some green underline if you copied this post into Word...

For one game, RR > BLM. Given that and a few bounces from the football Gods, y'all have a fighting chance.

Riel is a swear word east of Kenora.

With that offense on the field, he should have literally had the Stamps at his mercy. Have someone run a hot route in case they blitz / stack the box. If not, give it to Gable, who had been running great all game.

All things considered - I don't think either team would have been able to recruit him without having said HOF QB

And all hell breaks lose if you're to contemplate PEI in addition

Which comes in a green container...

Two good defenses but Stamps are more aggressive. Given that D wins championships - this one should be interesting.

More of the same from the Esks O - Calgary looking flat - Reilly getting time and making them pay

According to the all knowing Rod Black - it was because they were in the middle of the field and couldn't get out of bounds.

He wouldn't break our ratio, he'd smash it wide open

It cannot have been easy for Hurl either. The guy is solid on STs and as depth - the position he was put in this year was very unfair.

Sinopoli would be great too - he's bound to get some serious coin somewhere...

You - are a sick man!

It's an easy name to pronounce.

But let's be honest - the backbone of this O is Harris / Flanders out of the backfield. They need to field an OL that can maximize that.

I think three American OL - assuming a guard of Bond's calibre - are more valuable than 4 import receivers would be.

Start two Canadian WRs, sign Bond & kick ass with three imports plus Westerman on DL 2 WR 1 RB 2 OL 1 DL 1 S Plus guys like Neufeld, Thomas, Corney et. al. providing depth and flexibility

Ok, it makes sense now, thanks for the info, good sir

Gotta go with Trestman & Ray in this one - didn't know the Argos had that many sacks - plus Labatte is out for the Riders.

Esks are trending up at the right time, plus they have a QB who can handle pressure and take hits. I say if the Eskies contain Messam combined with their fierce pass rushers coming to play, they've got this.

That one has me scratching my head - must be a misunderstanding / misprint.

It's as inevitable as **** flowing downhill - so just go with the flow