Jump to content

davidjh141

Members
  • Posts

    53
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by davidjh141

  1. 15 minutes ago, Dr Zaius said:

    I can't stand the lapo classic: have a lead, with time running out.

    1st and 10 hand off up the gut that everyone in the country knows is coming. 2 yards gained. EVERY ******* TIME.

    I don't even see how that can be called "conservative". It's just stupid and predictable. Consistantly puts the team behind the 8 ball. 

    This. Lapo always calls the patented run up the middle late in the game. Goes nowhere. 2nd and long, QB draw or screen pass. Punt. Way too conservative 

  2. 1 hour ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

    Less that 5 times out of 100 according to an expected win formula I ran that includes net offense, turnovers and TOP based on last night's game.

    It was created for American Football but I think it transfers to Canadian Football.

    It's actually incredible the Bombers didn't give up a TD last night.  3 Edmonton drives started on the Bombers side of midfield and one started at the Bombers 20.

    Dont worry though, all Nichols does is win!

  3. 2 hours ago, Mike said:

    The problem with saying it’s luck is that people don’t realize it’s by design. Our defense operates differently in the red zone than they do when they’ve got a whole field behind them. It’s not luck that we’ve given up one major in two games.

    I don’t even necessarily like it. But it’s the way our D runs and it works.

    I hear what you're saying and hope you're right, but I'm skeptical. In the playoffs, with the game on the line, BLM, Harris, or Reilly are scoring touchdowns and not kicking 7 field goals. 

    If I remember our last 3 playoffs correctly it wasnt death by field goal. Other teams will score a TD when they need them, and our ability to counter punch with a TD of our own is non-existent with Nichols. If we cant run the ball, chances are were screwed.

×
×
  • Create New...