Bomber_fanaddict Posted August 23, 2013 Report Share Posted August 23, 2013 Hall estimated today that 50% of the offence has changed since MB took over. I didn't figure he would try to change that much so fast but it speaks volumes of how bad the offence was!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPuDS Posted August 23, 2013 Report Share Posted August 23, 2013 thats insane.. im shocked they could flip a playbook 50% on this short amount of time.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacquie Posted August 24, 2013 Report Share Posted August 24, 2013 Did he mean changes to the existing play book or new plays? I'm assuming the former. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pigseye Posted August 24, 2013 Report Share Posted August 24, 2013 No, no.... it was just better to ride the rickety BuckWagon, one more time.......with the 2 QB's behind him, boasting a total of 0 CFL starts..... Mack deserved to be fired for that particular setup, alone.... That seals it man, dod agrees with the nay sayers....ha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bomber_fanaddict Posted August 24, 2013 Report Share Posted August 24, 2013 Did he mean changes to the existing play book or new plays? I'm assuming the former. Didn't specify. Or at least I didn't hear if he did. I assume its changes to current play book MB said he wanted to change the things they shouldn't be doing and focus on the things he should be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17to85 Posted August 24, 2013 Report Share Posted August 24, 2013 It seems to me that the biggest change is taking a lot of the thinking out of it. Based on comments from everyone involved it seemed like Crowton had a lot of "if this then do that" built in and maybe our players just can't handle that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPuDS Posted August 24, 2013 Report Share Posted August 24, 2013 It seems to me that the biggest change is taking a lot of the thinking out of it. Based on comments from everyone involved it seemed like Crowton had a lot of "if this then do that" built in and maybe our players just can't handle that. thats true.. he said.crowtons offense had extra stuff for the players to attempt to follow and not simply one set play.. crowton out-thunk himself out of a job it sounds like... but i am curious, were they that confounding or are our offensive players that dense? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted August 24, 2013 Report Share Posted August 24, 2013 It seems to me that the biggest change is taking a lot of the thinking out of it. Based on comments from everyone involved it seemed like Crowton had a lot of "if this then do that" built in and maybe our players just can't handle that. thats true.. he said.crowtons offense had extra stuff for the players to attempt to follow and not simply one set play.. crowton out-thunk himself out of a job it sounds like... but i am curious, were they that confounding or are our offensive players that dense? Doesn't necessarily mean either. One of the issues when you have that many options is that the QB and receiver have to be on the same page. They have to be able to see the same thing and make the same decision about which option will be / should be run. An even tougher proposition with the carousel of QBs and inexperienced ones we had playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17to85 Posted August 24, 2013 Report Share Posted August 24, 2013 I agree, with a more veteran team that has had consistency at all positions it might have worked better but as it is just not happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now