The Unknown Poster Posted August 6, 2013 Report Share Posted August 6, 2013 So disappointed to here Burke's comments about how good the team is, how vastly improved they are and how they are on the "cusp". Worse, hearing Goltz parrot that same verbiage. Sounds like the team was given a PR release and told to use the word. Montreal fires their head coach. We pay ourselves on the back for not being blown out. Disgraceful. Mack left the cupboards bare as far as coaching goes. We literally cannot fire any of our coaches as we have no one to replace them. DR. CFL 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGhostOfJoeMack Posted August 6, 2013 Report Share Posted August 6, 2013 So disappointed to here Burke's comments about how good the team is, how vastly improved they are and how they are on the "cusp". Worse, hearing Goltz parrot that same verbiage. Sounds like the team was given a PR release and told to use the word. Montreal fires their head coach. We pay ourselves on the back for not being blown out. Disgraceful. Mack left the cupboards bare as far as coaching goes. We literally cannot fire any of our coaches as we have no one to replace them. Burke never said the team was "good"or that they "vastly improved". We lost to the Lions , a very good team, by 7 points with a QB making his 2 carreer pro start. I know you have a massive man crush on Buck but coming on here to misquote Burke to try and make him look bad is rather pathetic. Mr Dee 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iso_55 Posted August 6, 2013 Report Share Posted August 6, 2013 I heared the same thing The Unknown Poster heard & thought it was garbage. Absolute garbage. DR. CFL 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unknown Poster Posted August 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2013 I'm a fan of Burke dipshit so no I was not misquoting to make him look bad. If knowing buck has been better than Goltz is a man crush then you're nuts. Atomic 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Dee Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 Did i just miss the part where he said "vastly improved?" TheGhostOfJoeMack 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebusrankin Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 The cusp part annoyed me as well. I think we have some talent but after the past 3.5 years, I am leary of any on the cusp talk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 I'm a fan of Burke dipshit so no I was not misquoting to make him look bad. If knowing buck has been better than Goltz is a man crush then you're nuts.isn't goltz qb rating higher then Pierce? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Dee Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 Even when Goltz is sleeping, and on the cusp of a deep sleep, his QB rating is higher than Buck's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 I'm a fan of Burke dipshit so no I was not misquoting to make him look bad. If knowing buck has been better than Goltz is a man crush then you're nuts. a) Buck hasn't been better calling someone a "dipshit" isn't going to fly, so let's not let that happen again please. c) Even if Buck had been better, I'd certainly hope that isn't the ceiling he's expected to reach as a 7 year CFL veteran. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unknown Poster Posted August 7, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 Accusations and calling people pathetic shouldn't be acceptable here either. Just saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyOnTheSpot Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 Anyways, I hate it too when I hear Burke say how close we are. We have a good D, terrible special teams and worse offence. This team is in no way close. If we lose both Hamilton games, the season is over. Now that I WOULD call "close". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dascow Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 If we lose to Hamilton the season is not over. Heck, if we lose to Hamilton twice and Saskatchewan twice the season is not over. That's just the nature of the CFL. Right now the Bombers are 2 points from being tied for second place and 4 points out of first place. What else do you expect the coach to say? Keep in mind the Bombers were tied with the Lions in the fourth quarter, who are a damn good team playing at home. All Burke is doing is rallying the troops. Let's not over react. voodoochylde 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DR. CFL Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 If people think going potentially 6-12 and miraculously making the playoffs ahead of Edm and Ham I suggest they set there expectations a little higher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotoriousBIG Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 No one in the Bomber offices is blind. They know, standings aside, this team is a long way from being competitive. The big blow up is only a matter of time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGhostOfJoeMack Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 I'm a fan of Burke dipshit so no I was not misquoting to make him look bad. If knowing buck has been better than Goltz is a man crush then you're nuts. Show your source then. As far as the Buck comments go, I have asked you several times to justify your opinion as to why you think Buck is so much better than Goltz and you never can or do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGhostOfJoeMack Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 Accusations and calling people pathetic shouldn't be acceptable here either. Just saying. Accusations like the ones you were making? And I called your actions/intentions rather pathetic,not you personally so relax. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotoriousBIG Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 Show your source then. As far as the Buck comments go, I have asked you several times to justify your opinion as to why you think Buck is so much better than Goltz and you never can or do. One guy used to be very good but isn't even serviceable anymore -- the other has shown sparks but isn't ready to lead a (struggling) team yet. Great place to be. Thanks Joe Mack! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomic Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 Buck's still more accurate than Goltz, better decision maker, too. Those things may come in time for Goltz. Or they may not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17to85 Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 Buck's still more accurate than Goltz, better decision maker, too. hahahahahahahaha you know how I know that you're full of **** and haven't really watched Buck Pierce play the game this season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKAChip Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 Buck's still more accurate than Goltz, better decision maker, too. Those things may come in time for Goltz. Or they may not. Yeah this is pretty preposterous. Goltz may not have the best accuracy in the world but even in limited action, he hit his receivers in the hands on more regularity than Buck did this season and last. There is no excuse for air-mailing receivers the way Buck does with regularity. As far as decision making goes? How often did Goltz sit in the pocket forever and concede a sack? Once? I can't think of more than once and that was the last play of the game. Did he make a few bad reads and lock onto his primary receiver a few times? Of course, yes. But I would argue first of all that it was his second career start and the amount of times he locked onto his primary read was less than Buck's average per game and Buck is a bloody seven year veteran! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17to85 Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 Not only is Goltz making better decisions than PIerce, he's making decisions way way faster. It really blows my mind how anyone can seriously look at the way Pierce played the game this season and even try and defend it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomic Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 60.4% vs 57.7% accuracy. Receivers have dropped passes from both. As far as decision making, fast doesn't always equal right. Can't believe I have to explain that. Goltz had the lowest gain per pass in the league in that last game because he continues to throw it too early. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 60.4% vs 57.7% accuracy. Receivers have dropped passes from both. As far as decision making, fast doesn't always equal right. Can't believe I have to explain that. Goltz had the lowest gain per pass in the league in that last game because he continues to throw it too early. Maybe it's the play calling? Lots of short passes? Buck should have much longer passes considering they continually have him in max protection. What's the stats between both guys for rushing? I'm going to eager goltz had much more yards and TDs. What's the stats for interceptions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomic Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 But I would argue first of all that it was his second career start Now you're changing the argument. I'm talking about right now, not how he projects in the future (which you and I have no way of knowing). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DR. CFL Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 You guys are trying to put a band aid on flesh eating disease.... But still part of the unresolved giant Bomber puzzle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now