Mike Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, WinnipegGordo said: The Bombers didnt lose because of the 2 singles as it was still early in the game. The 3rd down turnover was worse. And I wouldnt have had Sergio kick that last kick off so deep. To me, this is such low level judging of the game. Of course we didn’t lose because of two singles. We lost because of continuous poor coaching, including the coaching choice to give up those two singles. this stuff isn’t happening in a vacuum but we continually watch our coaching staff make poor decision after poor decision after poor decision Booch, Blue28, Super Duper Negatron and 4 others 7
TommyClements Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago As much as it’s easy to say “bad coaching cost us the game” and the usual “Jake Thomas and too many linebackers on The roster is why we lost,” the fact is this team isn’t very talented. Receivers are below average, Collaros, Bryant and Streveler aren’t what they used to be. Dline doesn’t scare anyone, and we lost our starting corners. This season looks more on Walters than O’Shea at this point.
Tracker Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago PS: it would seem that the receiver that was added to the roster today is not the answer to the problems at receiver.
wbbfan Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 6 minutes ago, TransconaBomberfan said: Can't blame the refs This offense did nothing different after the half. No halftime adjustments Just watch the last 3 cups offense sucks Reffing is always bad. Wasn’t specifically worse or more one sided than normal. Our discipline was piss poor though.
Super Duper Negatron Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, Mike said: To me, this is such low level judging of the game. Of course we didn’t lose because of two singles. We lost because of continuous poor coaching, including the coaching choice to give up those two singles. this stuff isn’t happening in a vacuum but we continually watch our coaching staff make poor decision after poor decision after poor decision Are you sure we aren't in a vacuum? Because we suuuuuuuck.
JuranBoldenRules Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 3 minutes ago, WinnipegGordo said: The Bombers didnt lose because of the 2 singles as it was still early in the game. The 3rd down turnover was worse. And I wouldnt have had Sergio kick that last kick off so deep. Well yeah they had time to get those points back...but why give them up for like maybe 10-15 yards of field position on a kickoff? It's not like a punt where the returner has way less time when he gets the ball. Vaval catches the ball and runs up the field he's got 20 yards clear...and that's if he doesn't beat anyone. So ball coming down at 8 yard line, should get out to 28-30. Give up 1, you get it at the 40. Poetic that they lose by 2 on the points they gave away for very little benefit. O'Shea is outsmarting himself. rebusrankin and BigBlueFanatic 2
Booch Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Just now, TommyClements said: As much as it’s easy to say “bad coaching cost us the game” and the usual “Jake Thomas and too many linebackers on The roster is why we lost,” the fact is this team isn’t very talented. Receivers are below average, Collaros, Bryant and Streveler aren’t what they used to be. Dline doesn’t scare anyone, and we lost our starting corners. This season looks more on Walters than O’Shea at this point. That all leads back to coaching and who chose these guys...and or the inability to coach them up to succeed...or make any in game adjustments Walters doesn't cut guys...and play old useless crap BigBlueFanatic and Blue28 1 1
wbbfan Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, Tracker said: PS: it would seem that the receiver that was added to the roster today is not the answer to the problems at receiver. To be fair, we targeted him 3 times, he caught all 3, twice he took passes on 2nd down short of the marker and managed to get first downs. Hes not part of the wr problem either imo. Piggy 1 1
Super Duper Negatron Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Just now, JuranBoldenRules said: Well yeah they had time to get those points back...but why give them up for like maybe 10-15 yards of field position on a kickoff? It's not like a punt where the returner has way less time when he gets the ball. Vaval catches the ball and runs up the field he's got 20 yards clear...and that's if he doesn't beat anyone. So ball coming down at 8 yard line, should get out to 28-30. Give up 1, you get it at the 40. Poetic that they lose by 2 on the points they gave away for very little benefit. O'Shea is outsmarting himself. And this is the same coach that will punt every time before giving up a safety. It makes no sense. Piggy 1 and Booch 1 1
JuranBoldenRules Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 2 minutes ago, TommyClements said: As much as it’s easy to say “bad coaching cost us the game” and the usual “Jake Thomas and too many linebackers on The roster is why we lost,” the fact is this team isn’t very talented. Receivers are below average, Collaros, Bryant and Streveler aren’t what they used to be. Dline doesn’t scare anyone, and we lost our starting corners. This season looks more on Walters than O’Shea at this point. Yeah most of our position groups are losing to their opposite position group in any game. Our OL loses to the other teams DL, our DL has lost the battle most games, coming on a bit past couple weeks. Our receivers and DB's lose their matchups basically every game but Edmonton or BC. Piggy 1 and rebusrankin 2
wbbfan Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Just now, Booch said: That all leads back to coaching and who chose these guys...and or the inability to coach them up to succeed...or make any in game adjustments Walters doesn't cut guys...and play old useless crap Same type of stuff people used to say before the 19 gc win. WRs aren’t good enough, even though we featured guys like Lawler, Demski, Bailey, adams etc. Bad coaching, makes good plays under perform. The classic pitfall of poorly coached cfl teams. Wasting talent, making the team worse than the sum of its parts. Piggy 1, Booch and BigBlueFanatic 1 2
Tracker Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, wbbfan said: To be fair, we targeted him 3 times, he caught all 3, twice he took passes on 2nd down short of the marker and managed to get first downs. Hes not part of the wr problem either imo. Nor did he make a difference, either. He was not the reason the offence was flaccid, but not an upgrade.
Booch Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Yup...osh says we got all the talent we need...just make a few more plays...what a tool...maybe make a few more coaching calls...decisions...instructions...maybe the talent is there but not the coaching??? Blue28, Piggy 1 and rebusrankin 3
voodoochylde Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 4 minutes ago, wbbfan said: To be fair, we targeted him 3 times, he caught all 3, twice he took passes on 2nd down short of the marker and managed to get first downs. Hes not part of the wr problem either imo. And I’d suggest that it’s unfair to judge the receivers when the offensive scheme itself is terrible and does them no favours whatsoever. Not saying we are overly talented there but when your OC is in over his head, it’s hard to be successful. wbbfan, rebusrankin and BigBlueFanatic 3
Super Duper Negatron Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago We are missing the playoffs, aren't we?
Booch Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Just now, Super Duper Negatron said: We are missing the playoffs, aren't we? Crossover may be our way in Tracker 1
Brandon Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago I've watched UFC instead of this game, I assume it is not worth watching the replay of this game? Tracker 1
wbbfan Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Tracker said: Nor did he make a difference, either. He was not the reason the offence was flaccid, but not an upgrade. He was 100% an upgrade. He can’t fix problems with the playbook/call though. Just now, Brandon said: I've watched UFC instead of this game, I assume it is not worth watching the replay of this game? Nah highlights and that’s more than enough
voodoochylde Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Just now, Booch said: Crossover may be our way in And we lose to any team who will punch us in the mouth.
Booch Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Just now, Brandon said: I've watched UFC instead of this game, I assume it is not worth watching the replay of this game? First 25 mins or so...then please go find something to do... Super Duper Negatron and wbbfan 2
Super Duper Negatron Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Just now, Brandon said: I've watched UFC instead of this game, I assume it is not worth watching the replay of this game? First quarter maybe. Then turn on The Ring tape and let the creepy girl eat your soul instead. wbbfan, BigBlueFanatic and Booch 3
Brandon Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago So I assume mocking Fajardo as a starting QB after Zach loses his 3rd straight to Calgary is a bad idea? Piggy 1 and wbbfan 2
wbbfan Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 2 minutes ago, voodoochylde said: And I’d suggest that it’s unfair to judge the receivers when the offensive scheme itself is terrible and does them no favours whatsoever. Not saying we are overly talented there but when your OC is in over his head, it’s hard to be successful. We’ve seen change at wr, we’ve seen change at ol and qb. If we change hogan we would instantly know where the roster actually stood. Dump kola, and bring in one more wr and I bet you see a lot of improvement.
TransconaBomberfan Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago This season was over before even started the moment we signed Jake Thomas in January well before free agency. He sucks Brings absolutely nothing to the team The money they used on him could have gone to an impact player we let walk away wbbfan, Piggy 1, BigBlueFanatic and 2 others 4 1
wbbfan Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, Brandon said: So I assume mocking Fajardo as a starting QB after Zach loses his 3rd straight to Calgary is a bad idea? Started ok, think we had 30 yards passing in the second half.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now