Booch Posted August 10 Report Posted August 10 2 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said: Which is absolutely ******* stupid because when that ball drops where Vaval would be catching it the cover guys are still 25-30 yards away. So we're giving a point for like 10-15 yards assuming Vaval can't beat the first couple cover guys. Yeah...as mentioned many times...coaching kills us and we have won many games in spite of the coaching sportmentary2012 1
Atomic Posted August 10 Report Posted August 10 I feel like Zach is a little spooked by all the turnovers and playing a little conservative
Booch Posted August 10 Report Posted August 10 We really need a legit playmaker reciever Nolby, sportmentary2012, ddanger and 2 others 2 3
wbbfan Posted August 10 Report Posted August 10 2 minutes ago, Blue28 said: Hogan needs to go Hogans zeros rebusrankin and K-Shack 2
JuranBoldenRules Posted August 10 Report Posted August 10 Brady is having a crazy game given that he's basically going down at first contact. He's playing like a scat back in a 230 pound body.
JuranBoldenRules Posted August 10 Report Posted August 10 2 minutes ago, Atomic said: I feel like Zach is a little spooked by all the turnovers and playing a little conservative Not a ton of time, and not a ton of reliable targets. Atomic and Noeller 1 1
sportmentary2012 Posted August 10 Report Posted August 10 2 minutes ago, Atomic said: I feel like Zach is a little spooked by all the turnovers and playing a little conservative He should be spooked they cannot give the ball away for free Atomic and wbbfan 2
wbbfan Posted August 10 Report Posted August 10 1 minute ago, Booch said: We really need a legit playmaker reciever Should make pr room and bring guys in. Maybe Jake wieneke
Nolby Posted August 10 Report Posted August 10 3 minutes ago, Booch said: We really need a legit playmaker reciever We had him, now Hamilton has him wbbfan and K-Shack 2
voodoochylde Posted August 10 Report Posted August 10 So many plays where receivers are running routes at the same depth / level. This offense just doesn’t create space for players. Booch and wbbfan 2
Arnold_Palmer Posted August 10 Report Posted August 10 3 minutes ago, Atomic said: I feel like Zach is a little spooked by all the turnovers and playing a little conservative I think he’s having a pretty good game. On pace for 300 yards and most importantly no turnovers, they’re clearly trying to get rid of the ball quick to keep him upright. Noeller, Atomic, ddanger and 1 other 3 1
wbbfan Posted August 10 Report Posted August 10 3 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: So Cam Allen next week? I’d bank on that for sure 1 minute ago, Arnold_Palmer said: I think he’s having a pretty good game. On pace for 300 yards and most importantly no turnovers, they’re clearly trying to get rid of the ball quick to keep him upright. Only if Brady manages 200+ receiving though. rebusrankin 1
Booch Posted August 10 Report Posted August 10 1 minute ago, voodoochylde said: So many plays where receivers are running routes at the same depth / level. This offense just doesn’t create space for players. Yeah exactly...its horrible wbbfan 1
Arnold_Palmer Posted August 10 Report Posted August 10 1 minute ago, wbbfan said: I’d bank on that for sure Only if Brady manages 200+ receiving though. So be it. Get the ball into your best play makers hands. Unfortunately we just don’t have that X factor receiver right now.
Booch Posted August 10 Report Posted August 10 2 minutes ago, Arnold_Palmer said: I think he’s having a pretty good game. On pace for 300 yards and most importantly no turnovers, they’re clearly trying to get rid of the ball quick to keep him upright. I like that someone actually got in his head and hes now using the check down more liberally and not forcing stuff into interceptions 2 minutes ago, wbbfan said: I’d bank on that for sure We do have Osh for coach tho.....lol...prob dress Cooley or an extra import olineman voodoochylde and wbbfan 1 1
Old Bomber Fan Posted August 10 Report Posted August 10 If Vaal has been told to let it go into the end zone if it is 10 yds or less….WTF are the coaches thinking! I agree he catches on the 10 and will give us field position on the 20 at the least! That’s only 20 yards short from where they are spotting the ball and no points! Don’t talk about field position at this stage of the game please. By doing this you are making field position a more important position later in the game. It could be the difference between a one or two possession requirement at the end. Really questioning the coaching at all levels! Booch and sportmentary2012 1 1
wbbfan Posted August 10 Report Posted August 10 1 minute ago, Arnold_Palmer said: So be it. Get the ball into your best play makers hands. Unfortunately we just don’t have that X factor receiver right now. Gotta think cal adjusts to cover him better since he’s literally our only damage to them on O.
Booch Posted August 10 Report Posted August 10 Just now, Old Bomber Fan said: If Vaal has been told to let it go into the end zone if it is 10 yds or less….WTF are the coaches thinking! I agree he catches on the 10 and will give us field position on the 20 at the least! That’s only 20 yards short from where they are spotting the ball and no points! Don’t talk about field position at this stage of the game please. By doing this you are making field position a more important position later in the game. It could be the difference between a one or two possession requirement at the end. Really questioning the coaching at all levels! Yup...totally poor game plan if that's the case...considering its happened 2x now its obviously the plan....our coaching just neuters us on so many levels
JuranBoldenRules Posted August 10 Report Posted August 10 5 minutes ago, voodoochylde said: So many plays where receivers are running routes at the same depth / level. This offense just doesn’t create space for players. On any given play I'm not sure Wheatfall, Mitchell or Clercius are on the same page with anyone else on the field. They keep trying to put Clercius in the slot and the QB's keep looking really pissed off when he is in there instead of at Z. Noeller 1
Atomic Posted August 10 Report Posted August 10 Wheatfall has been invisible for like 5 games! wbbfan, TommyClements, sportmentary2012 and 1 other 1 2 1
voodoochylde Posted August 10 Report Posted August 10 I can’t believe they’ve done NOTHING to get Mitchell involved. Almost fitting a narrative. wbbfan 1
wbbfan Posted August 10 Report Posted August 10 Our wr core isn’t good. I’m not gonna say other wise. What I am gonna say, is no matter who we had it wouldn’t be enough to over come this trash passing scheme play call. rebusrankin 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now