Straight forward. This guy is low IQ and prob the worst coach in the league.

 

Discuss.

Official sell out for the record. 

2 minutes ago, Goalie said:

To put it on the President is tinfoil hat horse ****

You can run at far down the list as you like...GM,  HC, OC, DC.....Player Personnel.......they all can own a piece of this pie.

Just now, B-F-F-C said:

Once again the defence kept us in the game but the offence let us down once again.  Too many stalled drives in the red zone and of course the turnovers. 

This is 2 games in a row where the defence has played good enough to win. But no support at all from the offence.

Prob about 3rd or 4th in a row now. 

4 minutes ago, Brandon said:

Do they really look that good?  They barely won today and their offense looks like shite.   O'Shea's team looked better the last 2 seasons then what Riders look like now.     

How do they get sacks and pressure rushing 3 against our 5 and still get to our QB? Roosevelt had a good game as did their running back. 

4 minutes ago, B-F-F-C said:

And may I ask what inside information you have?

Unnamed sources in the White House....sorry I don’t throw people under that bus.

3 minutes ago, DR. CFL said:

You can run at far down the list as you like...GM,  HC, OC, DC.....Player Personnel.......they all can own a piece of this pie.

Oh ok.. Cuz what i see on the football field is a QB who is mentally done and an OC who is predictable. 

But ok.. Let's go after guys who dont play on the field.. Im guessing the last 2 seasons you were praising them all then or is it cuz losing u **** on ppl who play very little roles on the field

Players play.. Our QB has sucked. 

 

Bottom line.. CFL is a QB driven League.. Ours has sucked. Im not shocked we aren't good right now cuz it truly all starts and ends with the QB. 

Edited September 9, 20187 yr by Goalie

2 minutes ago, J5V said:

How do they get sacks and pressure rushing 3 against our 5 and still get to our QB? Roosevelt had a good game as did their running back. 

Cuz Hughes and Jefferson are very good. 

Matt Nichols tried to be Mike Reilly this year and accidentally turned himself into Drew Willy.

IF this coaching staff is in tact for Montreal, and thats a big 'if', Lapo needs to work with Streveler and get him up to speed/design plays for his skills...

Nichols is done - crossover is still there but get Streveler on a roll...  Nichols should not start another game

Sad thing is that our garbage offence is taking all the spotlight off Richie Hall's garbage second half D 

4 minutes ago, Goalie said:

Why dont u ask the OC who we have fired 2 x already

I'd rather ask the guy who's responsible for the OC who we have fired 2 x already, Mike O'Shea. You're wrong if you think O'Shea isn't also responsible for that O.

5 minutes ago, Goalie said:

Are you new to the CFL? Here.. Ill help you.. 

Teams with QBs = good 

Teams without = bad. 

Not new actually.....and....it was Hall’s fault and the defence for weeks....now it’s the OC and QBs fault.....it is a complicated game with numerous moving parts that all need to work in unison.

5 minutes ago, J5V said:

How do they get sacks and pressure rushing 3 against our 5 and still get to our QB? Roosevelt had a good game as did their running back. 

Because Neufeld as a guard is OK, but as a tackle he is in over his head. Jefferson ate his lunch all game long. 

3 minutes ago, Floyd said:

Matt Nichols tried to be Mike Reilly this year and accidentally turned himself into Drew Willy.

IF this coaching staff is in tact for Montreal, and thats a big 'if', Lapo needs to work with Streveler and get him up to speed/design plays for his skills...

Nichols is done - crossover is still there but get Streveler on a roll...  Nichols should not start another game

Sad thing is that our garbage offence is taking all the spotlight off Richie Hall's garbage second half D 

Lol. 25 ish  rider points off turnovers.. 6 FGs.. Pick 6 by us.. What more u want from the D? Nichols gave the riders 17 points on his own

Edited September 9, 20187 yr by Goalie

3 minutes ago, Goalie said:

Oh ok.. Cuz what i see on the football field is a QB who is mentally done and an OC who is predictable. 

But ok.. Let's go after guys who dont play on the field.. Im guessing the last 2 seasons you were praising them all then or is it cuz losing u **** on ppl who play very little roles on the field

Players play.. Our QB has sucked. 

Bottom line.. CFL is a QB driven League.. Ours has sucked. Im not shocked we aren't good right now cuz it truly all starts and ends with the QB. 

Except of course that the QB isn't responsible for pulling himself when he sucks, the head coach is. You can't blame everything on the QB and let the HC off the hook. MOS is the one who has left him in there loss after loss after loss after loss.

4 minutes ago, J5V said:

Except of course that the QB isn't responsible for pulling himself when he sucks, the head coach is. You can't blame everything on the QB and let the HC off the hook. MOS is the one who has left him in there loss after loss after loss after loss.

He pulled him this week. You cant change the past so i prefer not to talk about 3 weeks ago cuz its irrelevant to today. Who is to say pulling him 3 weeks ago makes a difference tho? Option 2 is a rookie.. A rookie whose strengths are being ignored by our idiot OC. 

 

Edited September 9, 20187 yr by Goalie

13 minutes ago, DR. CFL said:

Unnamed sources in the White House....sorry I don’t throw people under that bus.

So MOS pulled Nichols and put in Chris "The Saviour" Streveler.   He gets 1 TD but again he has 3 possessions inside of 3 minutes to go and came up with nothing.  He had the game in his hands but the result was the same. 

 

2 minutes ago, B-F-F-C said:

So MOS pulled Nichols and put in Chris "The Saviour" Streveler.   He gets 1 TD but again he has 3 possessions inside of 3 minutes to go and came up with nothing.  He had the game in his hands but the result was the same. 

 

Running Nichols playbook.

2 hours ago, B-F-F-C said:

So MOS pulled Nichols and put in Chris "The Saviour" Streveler.   He gets 1 TD but again he has 3 possessions inside of 3 minutes to go and came up with nothing.  He had the game in his hands but the result was the same. 

 

Streveler came into the game with a discouraged team and had stats pretty much identical to Nichols but gave no points to the Riders. Moreover, he was probably directed to stay in the pocket rather than roll out or run the ball.

I want to see what kind of plays they design for Streveller two weeks from now before I cast shade on lapo.  And even if Streve struggles against Montreal, how much blame can you fairly assign to Paul anyways?  Strev is pretty inexperienced and will make his fair share of mistakes.

1 minute ago, Tracker said:

Streveler came into the game with a discouraged team and had stats pretty much identical to Nichols but gave no points to the Riders. Moreover, he was probably directed to stay in the pocket rather than roll out or run the ball.

Spin it any way you want but I'm dealing with facts vs. assumptions.

2 hours ago, B-F-F-C said:

Spin it any way you want but I'm dealing with facts vs. assumptions.

Fact: Streveler is much more effective when he is mobile, so why would he voluntarily stay in the pocket?

38 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

Sure, why not waste another year with O'Shea? He needs time.  We need stability. 

True this. It only took him until season 3 before he stopped making rookie mistakes.

 

10 minutes ago, Goalie said:

He pulled him this week. You cant change the past so i prefer not to talk about 3 weeks ago cuz its irrelevant to today. Who is to say pulling him 3 weeks ago makes a difference tho? Option 2 is a rookie.. A rookie whose strengths are being ignored by our idiot OC. 

Your inability to assign any blame for this mess onto MOS is telling. He's the head coach. He's responsible for the OC and by extension, the QB. You can't defend him by blaming them and them only. MOS owns them both. It's his team. Ask him.

13 minutes ago, B-F-F-C said:

So MOS pulled Nichols and put in Chris "The Saviour" Streveler.   He gets 1 TD but again he has 3 possessions inside of 3 minutes to go and came up with nothing.  He had the game in his hands but the result was the same. 

The kid gets 1/2 a game and you're pinning it on him? Wow.

34 minutes ago, B-F-F-C said:

Once again the defence kept us in the game but the offence let us down once again.  Too many stalled drives in the red zone and of course the turnovers. 

This is 2 games in a row where the defence has played good enough to win. But no support at all from the offence.

More than 2.

7 minutes ago, blueandgoldguy said:

I want to see what kind of plays they design for Streveller two weeks from now before I cast shade on lapo.  And even if Streve struggles against Montreal, how much blame can you fairly assign to Paul anyways?  Strev is pretty inexperienced and will make his fair share of mistakes.

It'll be the same kind of plays they always use. This isn't Lapos first time running an offense in the CFL, it's not even his first time in this city, this is go #3 in Winnipeg for Lapo and it's the same **** he was running in 2002, except without Milt Stegall to make it work better. 

 

Lapo won't turn Streveler into the next great qb, we need to fire Lapo to take that step.