Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Morning Big Blue

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

US Politics

Lets see if we can keep this thread a little more civil.

I found this interview very interesting.  A lot of soft balls thrown at Trump, he explained his back pedalling on his more extreme issues as a lot of his claims as opening bids for negotiation purposes.  Which .. whatever .. I still think that those are insincere claims he used to get elected.

He does now come across way more presidential then he did prior to the election.  A lot of his noise, yelling, and rhetoric has been scaled back.

Do respect this one though:

Quote

 

Lesley Stahl: Are you gonna take the salary, the president’s salary?

Donald Trump: Well, I’ve never commented on this, but the answer is no. I think I have to by law take $1, so I’ll take $1 a year. But it’s a -- I don’t even know what it is.

Donald Trump: Do you know what the salary is?

Lesley Stahl: $400,000 you’re giving up.

Donald Trump: No, I’m not gonna take the salary. I’m not taking it.

 

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-donald-trump-family-melania-ivanka-lesley-stahl/

  • Replies 27.3k
  • Views 3.5m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • do or die
    do or die

    At this point, in trying to get any kind of a "win" the Republican "leadership"  Trump, Pence, O'Connell along with the ole Tea baggers like Rand Paul.....are pretty busy at work.   Belittling, t

  • "I worked 4 months in New York (medicine hat)  in a lab (strip club) and we were forbidden to share anything to media (hookers)and weren't allowed to speak with non-family  (johns)  about the  sc

  • HardCoreBlue
    HardCoreBlue

    Unfortunate about the suicide. We do though need a lot more of this declining hush money to expose bad behaviours. Makes no difference to me who these people who do bad things support politi

Featured Replies

Just now, JCon said:

They're doing it pro-bono. I laughed when I read that! Silly Senators, they should know the answers to the questions before they ask. 

Especially that prosecutor.  Im surprised she didnt look at that question and tell the Senators it literally didnt matter and would be transparent.  I havent seen the actual video of the questioning but from reading about it, reports are Trump is upset she didnt go after Dr Ford harder and people seem to think the prosecutor realized pretty quick she had a credible truthful witness and the whole thing was a sham.  She read the questions, even the stupid ones.

Anyone watching that can detail the conduct of the prosecutor?

With my crystal ball.......no matter what Kavanaugh says this afternoon, or how he comes across.....

You are going to get a lot of "Facts vs Emotion" from the Republicans..

Just a hunch...

 

How can any republicans be proud of this 

 

2 minutes ago, do or die said:

With my crystal ball.......no matter what Kavanaugh says this afternoon, or how he comes across.....

You are going to get a lot of "Facts vs Emotion" from the Republicans..

Just a hunch...

 

Yup.  They will say "no evidence, no corroboration". They will pretend the other allegations didnt happen.  They will say there is no time for an investigation.  And the crux of my issue with that is, there IS plenty of time.  They refused to hear Obama's nominee for a made up reason.  There is no magic drop dead date for confirming Kav.  They think they might lose the Senate, thats the problem.  So be it.  If Kav was a good pick, it wouldnt matter...the Senate is supposed to work together to confirm a qualified candidate.

My big problem is, this isnt like any other job.  Even a cabinet position where they could confirm him and if further evidence came forward later, they could fire him.  He gets this seat for life.  What happens if more people come forward and sue him or file criminal charges while he's on the SCOTUS??

Coming in the wake of their refusal to have any real investigation of anything.......today, Graham and Grassley look (and sound) like absolute caricatures, at this point.   

Just now, The Unknown Poster said:

Yup.  They will say "no evidence, no corroboration". They will pretend the other allegations didnt happen.  They will say there is no time for an investigation.  And the crux of my issue with that is, there IS plenty of time.  They refused to hear Obama's nominee for a made up reason.  There is no magic drop dead date for confirming Kav.  They think they might lose the Senate, thats the problem.  So be it.  If Kav was a good pick, it wouldnt matter...the Senate is supposed to work together to confirm a qualified candidate.

My big problem is, this isnt like any other job.  Even a cabinet position where they could confirm him and if further evidence came forward later, they could fire him.  He gets this seat for life.  What happens if more people come forward and sue him or file criminal charges while he's on the SCOTUS??

Well, you could end up taking it all the way to the Supreme Court, where he can then rule against it........

Related image

Wow is he is in attack mode, a fake news quote would be the cherry on top, he really feels that he deserves to be on SCOTUS

  The Republican white men on the Judiciary committee are too cowardly to question an assault victim....... but they're now chomping at the bit, to throw softball questions at the accused Republican white guy.   Great optics.....

Edited by do or die

2 minutes ago, bustamente said:

Wow is he is in attack mode, a fake news quote would be the cherry on top, he really feels that he deserves to be on SCOTUS

The proper term is "vigorous"

Quote

"Revenge on behalf of the Clintons"

The ultimate defense...

great point. He’s showing he is not impartial at all. 

1 minute ago, The Unknown Poster said:

great point. He’s showing he is not impartial at all. 

Impartial?  This guy came though the Republican internal vetting.... because he was seen as the most likely candidate to uphold the concept of Executive Privilege, in the high court, where and when required.  That got him the green light from Trump.

Instead of all the water he is guzzling down he should have a snickers.

1 hour ago, bustamente said:

Wow is he is in attack mode, a fake news quote would be the cherry on top, he really feels that he deserves to be on SCOTUS

Excellent judicial demeanor.   And this is just a hearing......

1 hour ago, The Unknown Poster said:

😮

 

Sen. Graham on Dr. Ford: “She is just as much a victim of this as I think Brett Kavanaugh”

 

Damn... I don't think Graham gets it.

Senator **** Durbin lays the smackdown on Kavanaugh

Still watching this crap.   So the new criteria for the comportment of Supreme Courts Judges is.......whining, crying, anger, aggression and bellowing out conspiracy theories.     

Only in Trump Land.  

The contrast with Professor Ford's testimony is glaring, indeed.....

 

 

1 hour ago, bustamente said:

Instead of all the water he is guzzling down he should have a snickers.

Why, would he turn into Bill Cosby?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Account

Navigation

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.