Jesse

Oh, F you. I was about to make this exact point and you beat me to it.

I'd argue that's what you're doing. You're pushing a definition over and over arguing semantics instead of engaging with the spirit of the conversation. We are talking about equity of results. IE. Women being treated equally to men in professional sports. Some women have spoken out in this case to help bridge that gap. To fine them would only make the gap wider. EDIT: And none of us grew up being taught that women belong in pro sports. This is us learning from previous generations mistakes and changing our view points over time with new information. Not just parroting the same privileged views without ever challenging ourselves to think with empathy.

Can you just pretend everyone is saying equity and stop arguing the point then?

I think it's dumb when people get fined for criticizing the league. If I'm in Barker's position and I took a bad fine in the past, I'd take this opportunity to fight for free speech. When they fined him, I'm sure he was against it, but now he's suddenly on the league's side and these women should be fined? Noooope.

Yeah. He's going to be rehabbing with the team, MOS said.

Doesn’t even make sense. We have 9 potential Canadian starters already.

Tait mentioned Kramdi took some safety reps too.

Doing the lords work out there, DT. Much appreciated.

Seems so!

So where is Cole lining up?

Seems self-explanatory. He was there and now he isn’t.

Rookie camp is 80% fluff.

I feel like some of you are overthinking this. It can be anything the Bombers want to pay them for. Players will still make numerous unpaid appearances for things like “I love to read month”.

I can’t count Dunigan. Man was hung out to dry.

The first in a thread where DT goes off on Pinball. Excellent read.

Thanks. The only reason it's confusing at all is the use of the word, "Minimum". Makes it seem like there is no maximum.

Some of you spend equal amounts of time complaining about the "old boys club" and the young guys that they do have starting. It can't be both.

That came out previously, didn't it?

The answer is treating other violations more seriously not treating this one less seriously, imo.

Murphy had an obligation to report the incident to the league and failed to do so. Regardless of Kelly’s guilt or innocence, Murphy failed to adhere to league policy.

But will most likely be nothing?

Literally every team could stand to upgrade their QB room. When Rourke does come back, it's likely going to be an end of season addition.

Downgrades compared to what though? Are you imagining Jeffcoat playing totally healthy for 18 games? And we're not going to get someone that good? Hardrick from 2019? Whether we kept these players or let them walk, we were getting a downgrade from what I think you're picturing in your head.

Not the whole story there. Bailey found a spot; Grant was likely a victim of both his injury history, lack of versatility, and the incoming changes to kick returns. Jeffcoat seems to have quit to a certain extent. Sounded like he got so frustrated he just walked away. I’m sure a team would have had a spot for him if he wanted to make it happen.

Drafting STers.