
Goalie
Members-
Posts
27,043 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
21
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Articles
Everything posted by Goalie
-
3 stars. 1. Griffin. Guy was seriously all over on D. Versatility is great. 2. Parker. Had a great game after being just ok last week. His fumble return was huge. Play of the game. 3. Wheatfall. I don’t think he missed a pass. Caught every ball thrown his way. Dudes becoming lawler.   HH. Eli for sure. I popped for the TD. HHH. Since it’s all about the game and how you play it here, I’m gonna give this one to Holm who had 8 tackles. crunch of the game. Bridges on the BC receiver. That was nice. Awe on Peterson was big also. I love players who celebrate when losing lol. and gotta mention cooley who had a 6.1 yard average on 7 carries. Was better than Peterson actually all in all. 2 and 0. And season series. And 2 and 0 vs west. And let’s be real. Edmonton isn’t great, Sask is barely beating bad teams and Calgary? I dunno what to think. In my opinion. Winnipeg and AND AND the Als are the top 2 and then it’s a bunch of just average.
-
Strev was taking the short stuff when he had to. Getting the ball out quick, bombers had a good mix of run and pass honestly. This week? Not so much. Zach isn’t a guy who takes the 5 6 yards to the open guy, he’d rather go 60 yards in 1 throw still. Zach kinda holding the ball longer than Streveler did. Only slight difference is on Strevelers “big throws” he was throwing 20 or 25 yard passes that were turned into big gainers from YAC. Good example was the Wheatfall big catch, Strev prob hits him in stride while Zach, well Keric had to stop and wait. Huge difference.
-
Bombers either blow them out or play down to their level. There’s no in between here honestly. Honestly it comes down to Zach and the O. We all want changes at times but most those changes on D, our D is already very good. Our O tho with Zach recently? It hasn’t been. Without the Parker fumble return, yeah, the O didn’t do much. Wheatfall seems to be the new lawler tho so that’s nice. This is how the O looked last year without Brady also.
-
Man. Got Neufeld confused with lofton. I did a Saskatchewan roughriders preseason 2 announcer thing where I confused a white man with a black man. Good lord. after watching again, oline seemed ok actually, BC aren’t exactly slouches defensively. And back to back makes it tougher. Zach started on fire but ended in flames. I’d get Mitchell on tho for sure because I think he’d want to prove something to Edmonton but Sterns seems to be a guy Zach likes. and prob Bailey instead of Weitz and leave it as is unless Brady good to go. Then you can take off Cooley and add your extra DE Like person who seems to be a hybrid type of guy who can rush the qb and drop into lb coverage. Versatility would seem to be a good thing. Dude should get a chance. it’s funny tho. Thought Zach would light it up cuz seems like he’s got the chip on the shoulder from the suspension but, he didn’t. And he’s still making dumb throws into double coverage and under throwing guys. Zach making rookie mistakes. The mistakes we half expected Streveler to make. If comparing Zach and Strev after 2 games, Streveler looked much better.
-
I’d consider making some changes this week with the only dangerous when mobile and improvising ford at QB. Jon Jones would get in. I’d get Mitchell on this week also (something about playing old teams theory) Kyrie can come out. I’d get vanterpool in for Randolph. Wallace was fine. Randolph and Bryant struggled and it had nothing to do with the center. That’s just hilarious honestly. Bryant getting beat isn’t cuz of Kolo. Randolph tho gives me takes plays off vibes where vanterpool does not. Cooley looked good. He can stay on. Not sure how you make it all work ratio wise but on would be J Jones, Vanterpool Mitchell. Off would be Kyrie Randolph and prob Sterns. Then you get Bailey on for Weitz cuz backup end is needed desperately with the aging ends we start. I’d consider benching Jefferson honestly for 1 game and inserting person. Thomas shouldn’t be getting 70 percent of the starters reps either. I’d also, Tony Jones leaves a lot to be desired honestly. I dunno. Yeah tackles but most are after yards gained it seems. I just think he’s average. Why not Ayers at Wil J Jones in the middle. Kramdi for ratio purposes. Griffin and the cdn kids backing up.
-
Everything you guys say Osh does, you appear to do the same thing. It’s pretty wild the narrative you constantly push when it appears you and Osh are similar actually. You have your guys who you think are all stars in the making and Osh has his guys who he thinks are. It’s actually just so repetitive at times it’s insane. Not talking you specifically here but making up **** now is just another level. @Tracker wtf dude seriously. ******* Fox News junkie much?
-
Why do ppl think bighill wants to coach even. Obviously he’s not even thinking about that if he signed to come in to compete for a mlb spot.
-
Both him and Vaughters do nothing all game. Willie living off past reputation now.
-
I thought Bryant and Randolph were more of a problem than Wallace honestly. Vanterpool for Randolph. Bryant had a bad night also. Willie and Vaughters ain’t it on D either.
-
Good half in a back to back situation.
-
Good lord. Why bother.
-
Seems like maybe Strev couldn’t.
-
Our OL ain’t looking great.
-
No. It’s 99 Lawson.
-
Omg was that Jake.
-
That was a pretty illegal block there. No call.
-
Take the 2.
-
Lots of Jake on D. Every snap almost.
-
Cuz Zach.
-
Demski keeps running for some reason.
-
Hey suitor. Cooley was on the PR. Dude seriously just making **** up.
-
TD bombers.
-
Nah. That’s not. Forward pass no? That’s a TD on replay.
-
The “starting” D is not great.
-
Sergio from 55. It’s good.