Booch

Just not giving Thomas and Korn reps will improve the whole oeverall aspect We need Person on...3 de's and honestl a 4th who adds something different ala Bailey and a real speed guy off edge would be ideal....when we had a legit dline...we had 4 guys who were not a drop off....and 2 import DY's who could play Woodbey is doing what they envisioned for Ayers...and he doing it damn well...drops into coverage...plays on end....up in middle flats.....so Ayers is redundant really and if they feel the meed to dress that additional import then put J.Jones in then....a guy who can play legit defensive reps in 2 spots in the LB core and plays ST....The 2 TD return game for Vaval interestingly enough Jones and Adams helped make that happen with key blocks on both TD's yup...the dude showed huge talent and major upside with more play....and then bam...shut right down for the 2 canadian slugs....and make it worse removed Adams too....Our best defensive front game of the yr....and we went totally away from what made it the best game...if that not an indication of a coaching staff with no clue I just dont know what is

He's been fine...he gets minimal reps but in those reps is assignment sound and garners attention Better plan would be to remove Ball for Bailey...Ayers for Adams....and with WJ...Vaughters...Person.Woods..Adams..Lawson...Bailey....no need for Thomas and use his spot for Vibert or Cobb and give your self extra receiver/returner depth....or Oline depth....but that would make us much better and a lot of semse...so it wont happen under this HC Ayers basically just plays teams...Woods..Adams and Bailey all can play teams, and get actual useful defensive reps....Wayching Thomas the last few games stumbling around on kick covergae, and on the short kick attempt was just pathetic and sad

BO

100 percent...totally forgot about him....and yeah u didnt cut it...you were outta town in short order

over 150 yards last 2 games...for a guy who cant run sure gets decent yards since he took off brace and is getting his full health back....imagine eh? dont have to....you just need a playbook with roll outs...sprints,,,multiple motions...varied qb design runs...not just draws and runs up the gut....that is in it in general........and then use those plays accordingly....aka...have a complete full pro-ready playbook. hate to nitpick you but what are u yammering on about...he's ran for 72...and 82 yards last 2 starts....combined 152... he's ran for 260...ZC for 105.....also...remove all the qb sneaks from Strev's runs as well then and then do your recompute....we get it....you dont like him....move on...but if you wanna slag a guy...get your stats and metric right and also factor in situational plays

That what puts guys like Grant...Riley...Ritchie and Murphy apart....put best out there regardless of passport or position...just made it work....and a guy like Murphy would turf your ass day game too if you did stupid stuff....or just plain sucked Every one those coaches....you earned the spot, but also had to maintain it.....Ritchie in his later yrs had a fondness for some his vets, but at the least some them still could play....

4 Cup wins....less seasons coached....fewer games played per season....lured away by NFL....nuff said 😁

no...I wholly wanted to....I wont relent either until he shows otherwise...why would I? No free passes in my world and currency from previous work done only last so long....

No...not what I saying...but also adapt or die And you can always correct a mistake if its warranted...unless u are Osh

and we wonder why we more times than not look unprepared, and usually out coached....and at times the most basic of football things are just awful

Thats another thing...If the league wanted to be more visible...open up to more eyes and viewers...time to start breaking up their broadcast rights into multiple packages and market them to new stations...TSN is embarrasingly bad....and more times than not...especially with the Kate led panel cringe worthy to watch...and thats being polite...if someone was happening to be just channel surfing and stopped on some of their sctick for a moment....it ain't drawing them in...Up the production Bring in a NFL ran broadcast entourage....graphics...camera views....pbp and panel people... how they go about producing the game....It would be likely unrecognizable to the CFL fan....and in a good way

This has nothing to do with the NFL....or any possible fluid relationship....NFL doesnt need it...never will. I think this fear of only the beginning is also just fer mongering...League will never go to 4 downs...what point would that make. I believe every tall forehead knows that one little decision would be the death blow and basically ruin the whole thing Changes can also be reversed too, if the fall out and the loss of fans which is the key driver...either by viewers or seats in butts affects the bottom line. Look how many times they changed the ratio requirement...the league still continued, and really if they truly wanted to create more scoring and exciting play, and maybe attract some pockets of fans they are missing right now, then as much as many if you have bemoaned it before....reduce the ratio...and have better players actually play, or of you have a 3 yr or more vet Canadian to your team you can account for 2 ST demon's as part of your "starting" 7 allowing teams 2 more valuable import spots on offence or defence And really....do people really come out in droves to watch below average at best Canadian guys running around chasing kicks and punts? If you do...Support your local CIS and Junior/high school football teams

U just explained yourself...hence Pot Thanks for confirmation 👍 U make claims for and about me continually...but can't handle the counter...and i guess I at least have a "gimmick" u just have baseless nonesense...

team may account for that too...I sure Miller will be open to what fans are saying...In my opinion...they better....makes sense

feeder league is nonesense.......feeder league would be a league where guys would be called up in season...and guys dropped into the CFL as well....U.S college feeds the league....CFL gets the scrps and the odd guys that slips thru said crack And more often than not...that guy gets a chance and within 1 ..2 yrs is right back anyway...the percentage of guys who are stars, and leave never to be back is probably less than 1% That 35 second clock thing....be insignificant I bet...

I get the seating part to an extent...half dozen this....6 of that kinda thing tho...from upper level...looking downat goaline...of it shifted 5 yards is it really gonna make that much a difference....Maybe to the filed levelpeople in lower bowl That being said...the opposite goaline is now closer too....and you are closer to mid field as well now I agree tho...the removing of the 55 seems kinda pointless. Maybe they will rethink part of it if they get serious backlash....never know

never took away the rouge...just the rouge that was not playable....and that I like.... Benches should never...ever have been same side...why some teams went that way is beyond me the change in field is minimal work...repaint the lines....move the posts.....you gain stadium space....not a big endeavor by any stretch its a fan sustained league....and may the hardcore fans are aging out...possible new ones know the NFL part...posts....no 55....so we wont be as foriegn They kept the core basis of the rules and game...save for a few really cosmetic changes, and limiting possible field goal returns....big whoop really What would people have preferred....keep all as is...Just go 4 downs?....doubt that would have been preferred Or eliminating ratio all together who many despise but would increase quality of play exponentially I was actually hoping for a reduction to be honest....as I dont watch the game to witness 12...to 15 guys from CIS schools running around chasing kicks...

hene....the need for nore offence and going for it...no? I see your point....but the pro's and cons likely balance out And really...how many missed FG for a TD do we see a yr...not like its an every game ...multiple times thing

to hell with FG's lol.... they have a developmental league....Div 1 and 2 in the us college system...More guys make it from there than the odd free agent here nah....grow balls and go for it....cause if you fail....the other team just obtained 15 moe extra yards for a ossible fg themselves Good coached teams will probably go for it way more often...and yeah likelyhood of TD's in crease...especially when you dont have to basically scheme for corner routes or fades for most part On flip side we screwed cause we aint well coached and Osh has plums the size of tick tacks and rarely gambles if it more than a yard

OR THAT hahah

Yup...don't mess with punt and kickoffs...3 downs...motion...width...im ok with it Single for missed fg was bush if it went out of enzone...thst be like giving half a goal for hitting the post

Some short...most wide...but guess we will see Returned misses are great...but u see more tds now likely As long as they didn't ruin the punt return rules...fair catch...etc...and kick offs...its fine

Most returned missed ones are long range ones.. ones 40 yards and in generally go out the endzone anyway...

Yeah field goal returns will still be there...teams will still try 50 yard plus kicks The post moving tho was a long time coming really...and it definitely opens up whole endzone and will increase scoring... I always hated rouge fir a miss or kicked out of bounds too These changes are all fine by me...and like he said.. powers that be wanted it...wasn't forced

Width needed to stay...pooching 10 yards but moving posts back with standard endzones...I don't mind