kelownabomberfan

but anyway, the point still stands - I am pretty sure that "I love the uneducated" comment was a shot at Hillary.

ha ha yeah, too bad she messed that one up. You nailed it.

wasn't this a shot at Hillary for her "basket of deplorables" comment?

I thought that was Brock Ralph...

remember that season Taman went out and signed both McGarity and Kamau Incompleterson. Five games in and they had hardly any catches. A lot of drops. That was hard to watch. And stomach. Was Chris Brazzell also around at that same time? We just seemed to have a knack for signing receivers who were actually more droppers than catchers.

maybe so, but Ben Affleck doesn't go ape-**** when Bill talks about Christians. Weird how that works.

Arjei Franklin says hi...

Jamie Stoddard has both of those guys beat.

Mack's first experience in the CFL came in 1984 as the director of player personnel for the Blue Bombers. During his tenure in Winnipeg he supplied players for head coaches Cal Murphy and Mike Riley.[4] The Blue Bombers won their first Grey Cup in 22 years in 1984 and had an overall record of 46-21-1 during Mack's tenure there.

if only you could fit the SMS calcs on a Subway napkin...

wasn't Mack part of the 1984 Grey Cup team in some way?

Mahoney!

his views on Muslims don't mesh with the Democrat view point. Ben Affleck can tell you all about it.

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/entertainment/game-of-thrones/hbo-responds-to-game-of-thrones-coffee-cup-blunder/ar-AAB0t5a?ocid=spartanntp

now that she knows the truth, she could marry Jon Snow! At least it's only a cousin (just rename Winterfell "Regina") and not his aunt.

Sansa and Arya are a formidable pair. I could see why Dany was so scared when she was begging Jon not to tell Sansa that he is her nephew.

you are two hours too late....

he's not on the roster...

and the biggest reveal of all - Winterfell has a Starbucks!

was there any discussion about what happened to Flanders? I can't find anything anywhere.

Did I say that? I just found it funny that Farrakhan was lumped in with those far right guys. Weird too. Like he was a sacrificial lamb so that FB could say they weren't just targeting the far right. Slippery slope though. Who makes these decisions, and what are the consequences? What happens when they start banning people who you do agree with? Will you still be in agreement with banning peoples' access to social media platforms? How long can Antifa stay on FB given how much violence they incite? The part that made no sense was that FB couldn't explain where the terms of service were violated by any of these people. You would think that they could at least provide that much information.

The Democrats also have support from the base, no matter what they do. That was my point.

This is just 100% BS.