Mike

I actually thought Montreal got a decent amount of pressure in the first quarter, they were forcing his hand quite a bit. Did I hear correctly that McAdoo called 93% pass in the first half? Saskatchewan is just a terribly coached football team. We should take them to the cleaners next week.

This poll has way too many options, I've been staring at it for a few minutes trying to figure out what to pick and I just have no idea. It was a horrible call. The ball doesn't have to just break the goal line, it has to break the goal line while a player has possession and once that ball starts moving to that extent, it's not possession anymore.

Goooooo Montreal!

You're lucky I don't give you a warning for inappropriate and foul language.

I do not like it whatsoever but a lot of people seem to.

If I remember correctly you're also a redhead.

It's literally one of the more interesting discussions we've had on this board in the past little while, but if you don't like hearing about the processes of a front office from a guy like Booch who would most certainly know ... to each their own.

The funny thing is, I remember the opposite argument when Joe Mack didn't do it at all. It's not highly unusual that we run open camps at all. Saskatchewan runs just as many open cam ... ah, dammit.

Can't say I agree with that. Plenty of teams operate like that. Besides ... what would that have to do with anything, even if it were true? There are probably more receivers than nearly any other position in football and we can't find ANY?

Man can we ever not scout receivers. Even Washington was not a find of ours. What is it with this group of scouts? Glad Thorpe is sticking around.

My top 10 would be ... Mitchell, Reilly, Bowman, Hughes, Lawrence, Dennis, Bond, Elimimian, Leggett and Sewell Rounding out the top 20 is a bit harder but I'd go Messam, Arceneaux, Roosevelt, Daniels, Lemon, Kanneh, Singleton, Chick, Harris and Jackson

Wasn't a fan of it. Few good ones, mostly a bunch of meh.

88, 82 and 19 were all new. Tachinski was 82. He is also not black, so couldn't be 19.

Flatlanders was fairly solid, although the layout made it difficult to move around. Lots of good beer options ... if anyone likes the hoppy stuff, the Double Juicy IPA by Garrison, Full Time IPA by Beau's or Side Cut NE IPA by Bridge are all good options in stock at the LC at the moment. Not mind-blowing, but better than most options you'll find here in the city.

It's not just for you, you know. Bayley isn't my cup of tea, but she's the favorite wrestler of probably every little girl out there. She's insanely popular with the market she's meant for.

Also ... Chris Rainey at 17 is a bit ridiculous. He's an interesting player, but he's not even prime-Brandon Banks level for what he does. Nice little piece to have. Jennings at 5 seems ridiculously high, I wouldn't have had him in the top 20. Naaman Roosevelt way too low. Abdul Kanneh being unranked is ridiculous, he's probably the best DB in the league. Top 3 at worst. John White quite a bit too far down the list for my liking. Toliver not being on the list is a bit strange too, he's one of the better receivers in the league.

Sorenson ahead of Bond hahahahahaha hahahahahahaha HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I just don't see a way we don't have Jeffcoat and Johnson in the lineup. It wouldn't make a whole lot of sense.

I can't see a world where we start JT and Hurl without dressing Poop.

Bruce Johnson's hand was in a cast which makes me think he might be out a week? Fogg starts perhaps?

Flanders/Fogg? Medlock, Jeffcoat, Flanders and Fogg as DI?

Washington sounds like he's going to be the guy in week 1, thankfully.

I wonder if it's DiAndre Campbell ... we released him after rookie camp, when I thought he looked pretty decent and I wondered if it was injury related ... he wore #19 in college/NFL ... he'd be about the right size

I'd be surprised, but I suppose it's possible.

I mean, I'm not sure how you don't work to get that information. Our media just doesn't care, I guess.