Dodge and Burn
-
Posts
466 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Articles
Posts posted by Dodge and Burn
-
-
-
Our hogs on both sides win this game.
Bombers 31
Regina 21
-
1 hour ago, bustamente said:
Wasn't that road griller
That the person!
-
Just now, bustamente said:
I think he went by Bennie Thompson
Yeah that might be the "breaking news" thread guy.
But im pretty sure Gbill was the dude that went on and on and on about Goltz...it was really wierd.
-
21 minutes ago, 66 Chevelle said:
I think that if we don't win it all we're in for a healthy dose of 'if Nichols hadn't gotten hurt' for months to come from our own fan base... we've got more than 1 enabler in our midst...
I doubt it.
We lose, all attention goes to the FA qb's that make it to the market.
Regardless of what happens this year? I don't think the Bomber brass hold pat with what we have.
If Arbucle and or Masoli make it to FA we make a push for one of them.
I vote Masoli.
-
20 minutes ago, gcn11 said:
No different guy. The guy you are talking about was the guy who faked TC reports, the guy im talking about was the guy who went loco here when people disagreed with his TC summaries. They werent fake though.
Gbill did not fake TC reports.
Pretty sure that was shankmans brother.
-
1 minute ago, 66 Chevelle said:
you know what you call a wide receiver that can't catch? a defensive back...
lucky for Collaros he ran into a lot of these guys over the last 2 games or he would already have a 6 or 7 in the INT column...
Yup. True.
-
8 minutes ago, gcn11 said:
Different guy...I think...but I can't be sure now. You have given me a lot to think about.
Wasn't he the guy that had a biggie for Goltz?
-
9 hours ago, gcn11 said:
Best thing about this site is that you never have to worry about the return of gbill.
Near the end of OB, I remember him having discussions with seemingly himself...
It was odd, wierd, entertaining and sad all at once.
-
12 minutes ago, kelownabomberfan said:
Sean Salisbury 2.0!
Actually ZC reminds me a lot of Tom Clements. Even down to the easily and oft injured part.
Tommy had a beautiful delivery throwing on the run. Running left, hard plant with the right leg, hard torso right, small lift of both feet and sling. Beautiful.
Actually if we face the tabbies in the cup....won't say much more than it would have many similarities between that scenario and our '84 cup win in Alberta...
To dream a dream...
- J5V and HardCoreBlue
-
1
-
1
-
I expect the greeners to send alot of heat throughout the game. One, to run stop, two, make ZC hit the hot route.
Hopefully ZC and Lapo work on the hots and I also see us using alot more misdirection than we already do. (Which is a **** ton)
Our hogs plug thier blitz, we win.
I said weeks ago on the other site that ZC will bring the cup home. I stand by that.
He will give us a maigcal 5 week run and move on in the offseason.
-
Obviously we ride Zac. Hes a pro QB.
Hopefully the Strev-elators could see that tonight...
-
5 minutes ago, Deiter Fan said:
And ya figure whining and crying about whining and crying gives you the high ground?
Naw, just right. 😉
-
2 minutes ago, AKAChip said:
The whole point is that Nichols’ 7-2 wasn’t a sustainable 7-2. And he’s damn lucky he got hurt or you’d be seeing the same results with him and there’s be no chance he gets brought back next season over the mystique of “mayyyybe we were just one Nichols injury away from dominating our way to the cup!!”
More Doc Brown fantasy is all...
Strev has not won us games. What else matters?
-
Just now, AKAChip said:
Future wins is more important than past wins. Other than in a specific championship scenario.
Well we aint winning NOW which i think is more important that the Doc Brown fantasy you just said.
-
Just now, J5V said:
I think you're just PO'd with this team and venting your anger on Streveler. You're blowing off the fact that Nichols won against inferior competition and lost against superior competition (Hamilton) just as Streveler is now.
Sorry but just pointing out what soo many people where crying and whining for, Strev to replace Nichols.
It hasn't worked out. Not saying its all om Strev but the masses got what they were cryinf for...now its not just simple as the QB
-
2 minutes ago, AKAChip said:
The bottom line is we’re never going to agree on this. We will never know how Streveler would have fared against the crap teams Nichols played or how Nichols would have fared over the past six weeks. To me, it’s clear the red flags were there for Nichols as well and he was regressive heavily before he got hurt. You’re free to disagree but you haven’t raised a single point outside of “Nicholz had seven winz!!!!”
What matters beyond "winz"
-
8 minutes ago, AKAChip said:
He was subpar today and in a few other starts. He was good in a couple as well. Not saying Fajardo is good but he looked indisputably terrible every time he got a chance in his first two seasons and now bare minimum he moves the ball and gives his team a chance to win most nights. We can’t forget that Streveler is 24 and only started two seasons in college. He’s extremely raw. Once again, he very easily could end up being terrible but even if he is, we didn’t know that at the time. Nichols had an extremely large sample size of mediocre at best play. Not that you can’t win with him, but I don’t love relying on luck and DST scores to win games.
You kinda ran around alot of bushes on that post..
Still didnt really defend your stance on Strev giving us a better chance at winning NOW did ya?
-
1 minute ago, J5V said:
Nope, Nichols didn't play the Riders this season.
Nichols' played the soft part of the schedule and his wins came against the worst teams in the league -- BC, Ottawa, Edmonton, and Toronto. Streveler likely cashes in those wins too. Nichols also beat Bo-less Calgary throwing for 0 TDs and running for 2 yards so he doesn't get much credit there. As soon as Nichols played a good team like Hamilton he was throwing picks and looked awful.
Dang, lucky we won any games this year?
-
6 minutes ago, AKAChip said:
Replacing a known commodity who is subpar (Nichols) with an unknown commodity who may or may not be subpar (Streveler at the time) is something I will always unapologetically advocate for.
So when does Strev venture into subpar territory?
Like I said earlier, too many fans like the shinny new object, and are blinded by it.
We were 7-2 before the Strev took over...facts is facts.
-
3 minutes ago, AKAChip said:
Look, I recognize you’re not the type of person who can engage in a nice friendly debate but how many of Nichols’ wins were against the three worst teams in the league? And how many touchdowns did the defence or special teams score in those wins? That’s a good place to start.
Im pointing out how you were one of the most vocal people calling for Strev to replace Nichols.
Im assuming you thought it would result in better results for the Bombers.
Just simply pointing out it was wrong.
-
1 minute ago, AKAChip said:
My response is that’s an extremely simplistic narrative when there are countless other factors at play. If you can’t see it, there’s really no chance of having a measured conversation.
But when Nichols was under center it was less "countless" for you right?.... smh...
-
7 minutes ago, AKAChip said:
What a narrative! We’re all wiser from listening to you pontificate about the intricacies of this great sport.
Ok, how about hard results...
Strevs wins vs Nichols,
Your response:
-
7 minutes ago, wanna-b-fanboy said:
It's sad... our offence is regressing... 34, 13, 6... good grief. Next week... a ******* rouge?
Goss darn though, Strev played his heart out...
The guy aint a pro qb Bomber fans.
WF - GDT - Blue Bombers @ Roughriders
in Blue Bomber Discussion
Posted
Strevs success depends on game flow, I thought his involvement was forced today.
ZC was shredding the greeners and should have been let lose today. Strevs play held us back tofay.