wbbfan

I’d be surprised if he was back and ready for this year. He would be a phenomena fit though.

I think both were a problem. Same was moxey is a problem. And kelly. I’m sure kramdi will go back to S as he seems almost ready. Don’t love it. But i also wouldn’t mess with smith at sam. I’d rather put kyrie or an athletic guy at S. Also, i’d put vaval in the nickle pack as the second S if we want to run that cover 2. Vaval is great at reading the ball in the air, crazy dynamic and physical. he’s been much better this year than last when pressed into duty as well. He would really give teams some thing to worry about in the secondary

no joke. Alexander is taking on maas’ old personality. We coached and played to win. That’s a huge improvement. We acted as though the season was on the line, and it was. They pulled it out against all odds, which is fantastic. Mos taking the ball again to start instead of playing for 4th q wind, challenging the first play, we haven’t seen mos like this since before the 19 gc win. I give him props for that for sure. Idk if it will change any ones fortunes or not, but i am really glad that this team and the mafia aren’t going to go gentle into that good night. To me, that looked like paddy sending a message to the rest of this team and the league. I’ll take it too. Give me penalties of aggression and edgy play over soft, indecisive football any day. we did a much better job of using nield. We gotta let the few big guys we have do big guy stuff. Rather than tossing 50/50 balls to the jv size guys mtl is like that though. Also, with a huge hole at S it makes limiting big plays harder. We also blitzed with fewer guys but more frequency which is the risk you run.

If we can maintain this level of urgency, sure. But any thing can happen game to game in the cfl. We still made some of the same mistakes, poorly managed the roster, and didn’t execute basics well (like tackling) Idk if we are this good and the first half of edmonton game good, or if teams just got caught in trap games against us. We will see in the next two weeks though. If we split those games we are in a drastically better position then i would’ve thought possible.

I agree. I don’t think kramdi is a premier starting canadian, but most teams start a guy like that at S over the past few years. more so, those snaps are going to lbers and dl now. But kramdi is solid, he’d be much better off at wil

3rd quarter is gonna be a mess. Despite a lot of good on off in the first half, 6 carries for brady is bad. vs 8 for perkins is stupid. Ball security is awful. Discipline and tackling are also awful.

second half adjustment/effort and every little play that matters

very little development across the board. I agree nield didn’t score, but i think that was helmet to helmet, but not intentionally.

atleast not the kicking part.

kelly is better in coverage, kramdi is worlds better tacking and has a nose for the ball and big plays. tremendous in the box too. Kelly is soft. Both have uses both are limited but kelly much more so. helmet to helmet

give your self the chance to play action and take a shot too

daniels football iq is either single digits or in the negative

that was a lot of soft ass lazy finish

smith might be the best kept secret in the whole damn league very close if it wasn’t.

surprise surprise

yes, it’s about the input not the out come. If you get the input right, the outcome will go in the right direction with time.

block to the back of wj prevented a sack gotta call that

honestly i’ll take penalties of aggression. especially with where our level of play has been

seriously huge. built like a madden cheat code. I love mci getting down field blowing up the blocker and making a diving ankle grab tackle on the returner.

nasty at last

is this finally urgency, or desperation from the bombers? maybe both.

it feels like the injury spotter got let go. they don’t often step in any more

The record for points in a cfl game is 111, if we are gonna win and give up 50 we better beat that record. Though the argos put up 68 in that game.

If the mix of thumpings and heartbreaking collapses isn't enough to evoke change, I don't know why a singular blow-out loss to the best team in the league would. I think the earliest event that could cause a serious discussion for the upper brass here is if we lose back-to-back in the LDC/BJB, or if attendance really dips in the Toronto home game right after the BJB. That said, I think we only stand an ok chance of winning 1 of the next 5 games. Which would put us at 6-9 with 3 games to go, likely needing to either get a lot of help while winning 2 games or needing to win out to cross over. I don't see Edmonton resting starters in the 2nd-to-last week of the season the way they are fighting Sask. And short of catastrophe, Calgary and bc will be battling for the playoffs in weeks 19 and 21 as well. No free wins the rest of the way. Except maybe edmonton and montreal vs us.

SPECIAL TEAMS!111111 lol But why 2 DI lbers, 3 if you include Woodbey. And Woodbey has not picked up where he left off last year in terms of coverage, even pre injury. Why do we feel the need to preserve the energy of starters by having soo many dedicated Teams players, and rotate some positions like DL, but refuse to carry a capable back up cover man, or pass catcher.