All Activity
- Past hour
-
-
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
It's not a shot. I am hoping he develops into something more, but he's not there now. We need to add some proven NAT receiver depth.
-
25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
It was a very curious decision to put that in place given we were just starting to see a vast talent drain after the NFL's PR expansion.
-
-
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
100% but again...he has produced when needed. I think they can and should find a more adequate depth piece....but Corcoran is taking unnecessary shots
-
25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
It was because of a #1 pick (an OL I think). He ended up getting signed for a ridiculous amount before he did anything. The CFLPA basically said teams are signing these huge contracts for a guy who hasn't done anything only because he's a high canadian pick. While other stars aren't being compensated to the same degree even though they are legit stars for the league/team. And I can see their point. But...it's back fired now. Because whatever the cap is now is so low that for a guy that's on the edge of being on an NFL roster/pr, it just doesn't make financial sense to sign with the CFL until he's sure he's got no chance. And as we are seeing, that can take years.
-
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
I'm not against the guy, I just have not seen him offer much of anything when he is in the lineup. Would love to know what they see in him. Not saying there isn't something there it's just not obvious. Sure. But if we are going 3 NAT receivers then he should not be front line depth. It is essential that we have a guy who can produce if that is our plan. Just a body is not good enough. No different that Jake Thomas the past few years, if we had kept him down to 8-10 snaps a game no one would be complaining but he got thrust into a starting role and became a glaring weak spot for us. Are you comfortable with Corcoran coming off the bench to be a potential starter if any of our 3 starting NATs go down. I'm not.
-
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Listen I'm no fan of Corcoran. But he did everything asked of him last year. He caught basically everything that was catchable. He's not going to be a star WR, but he's more than adequate as a back up.
-
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Despite his shockingly bad test numbers, he was a reasonably productive rec in the US. Maybe there’s something there.
- Today
-
25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
Totally agree. I don't understand why the hell they even capped it. Cap year one if you must, then allow teams to renegotiate the contract if they so choose.
-
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
For some reason or other Kyle seems very high on Corcoran. Just wish I knew why.
-
-
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
This love for a guy who'd make Rudy look like an All Pro is maddening.
-
-
-
-
-
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Yeah that needs to be revamped Yeah Corcoran shouldn't even be in discussion as a starter option..depth on the PR if one of Demski..Neild..Clercius or Cobb (who should be the main backup on roster as he fils multiple roles) gets hurt
-
-
-
-
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Do not like how he lumped Corcoran in with Clericius. Clercius is a wr with tremendous raw tools who has caught everything thrown his way. Corcoran is like Wade Miller on a low-battery mobility scooter.
-
The Tech Thread
Motion Picture Association Denounces ‘Massive’ Infringement on Seedance 2.0
-
25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
I’d add ffs at the end of this sentence for good measure. :)
-
The 2026 Grim Reaper Thread
https://variety.com/2026/film/news/bud-cort-dead-harold-and-maude-1236659856/
-
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Maybe trade with toronto or ott. Our first, and third for their first and second, be nice to swap a global pick to move up too. A nat imp offence x-factor/wr would be a fantastic fit. A nat imp offence x-factor/wr would be a fantastic fit.
-
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Careful, don't you know there are people on here who know better than he does what's good for him? Sure they've never met him, but they know exactly what he should be doing with his own life, and if he doesn't it's because he's a pompous ass.
-
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
In my humble opinion, the CFL, especially Commish and his team, need to do a way better job at providing an environment and market where elite players know they can carve out nice careers in the CFL and spend less time f'ing around with the rules ffs.
-
25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
CFL needs to drop the salary provisions on deals for Nationals and increase the operations cap.
-
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
I don't blame Elgersma one bit. The insane NAT draftee 3 year entry level deal is a joke.
-
25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
With the NFL now grabbing and sitting on a ton of NAT OL due to expanded PR sizes and eligibility, we just don't have the luxury of an all NAT OL in this league anymore. We lose the top of our draft every year to them and it takes years, in many cases, for these guys to shake loose now. Double that up with the insane 3 year entry level pay rates for draftees and you get every NAT OL who even gets a whiff of the NFL, even though they are just signed to futures contracts which translates almost to guaranteed to get cut, going and playing long odds to sit on an NFL PR. The CFL needs to drop the salary provisions on the entry level deal. We are delaying getting our draftees here because they are willing to roll the dice rather than play for peanuts.
-
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
He should have a chat with Nathan Rourke, looks like they're following a similar path with NR further ahead on it.
-
25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
Which is why THERE ARE TIMES (not always) when I wish the ratio would be gone so guys like Stanley Bryant can be at the top of the pay scale. I've seen enough shitty Canadian OL who'll never, ever be close to even thinking about being great except in their own minds... get totally overpaid. Think of the pylons we had playing for us on the OL in the early 2010's. We tried to build an All Canadian OL & after 3 years Walters & Osh were no closer to fininshing what they started.
-
25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
NAT OL, or any other starting NAT, is going to make more than most IMPs at the same or similar position. I liked Walters presser. I like how he confirmed that we will be seeing a lot of 30 front this year and that was one of the reasons he went hard after Ceresna. It seemed like this was the probability when we signed Ceresna and then JSK afterwards. I know a lot of us here don't care for 30 front, but if you got the right pieces it can be a very good defence against the passing game. Last year we just didn't have the horses. With Ceresna here, and more Lawson, we should be able to execute it at a much higher level. I think this would give Jaworski a big edge in camp for the other DE spot as well.
-
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Elgersma will be here when he gets here. Not worried about that at all. He's got an agent blowing sunshine up his arse right now, so let's dial it back a bit about how he will never play here. Reality will set in, and he will come. We can go 3 NAT receivers but there is no requirement to do so if we go 3 IMP OL. We can make ratio in other places or even use the naturalized IMP rule.