bustamente Posted July 14, 2016 Report Share Posted July 14, 2016 These are very good resigns and the contracts are very much show me terms, if one or the other progresses they will be rewarded if not there will be someone waiting to take their spot. Ducky 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted July 14, 2016 Report Share Posted July 14, 2016 Are there teams out there that would pass on Armia? Sure, but you only need one team that would have room for him and would want to take a flyer on a former 1st round draft pick, on a cheap contract and who is still young enough and growing into his game. Sending down Armia over Dano would be poor roster management. Unless Armia really craps the bed in camp, the difference between the two isn't great enough to risk losing an asset for nothing. Jimmy Pop and The Unknown Poster 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted July 14, 2016 Report Share Posted July 14, 2016 Probably gonna lose 1 in the expansion draft for nothing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IC Khari Posted July 14, 2016 Report Share Posted July 14, 2016 1 hour ago, kelownabomberfan said: Good job Chevy. Expecting big things out of both of these guys this year, in the bottom six. Both are key guys on the third and fourth lines. Armia adds a lot of skill, hope he can play with Copp again this year, as Copp really seemed to pick up his game with Armia on his wing instead of Thorbs. No offence to Thorbs, but that's like saying our marriage really picked up once my mother-in-law moved out The Unknown Poster 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unknown Poster Posted July 15, 2016 Report Share Posted July 15, 2016 Jets could make a deal with Vegas to not pick someone they valued but they'd have to really value the guy to bother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ducky Posted July 15, 2016 Author Report Share Posted July 15, 2016 Dano can be sent down without waivers. Why lose an asset for nothing? Bad asset management 101. Armia will start with the team and if he doesn't produce, I could easily see him in a trade. Lowry too. Great signings by Chevy. bustamente 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrg Posted July 15, 2016 Report Share Posted July 15, 2016 17 hours ago, Atomic said: In what way? I don't get what you're saying. I'd guess he's saying we don't want to risk losing him for nothing until we have a better sense of what he can be. A 50/50 chance of that is too much. If you were told to go saddle a horse, but that there was only a 50/50 chance it would ram it's hoof into your junk, you'd probably say 50/50 is too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomic Posted July 15, 2016 Report Share Posted July 15, 2016 Well I wouldn't stand behind the horse. mbrg 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ducky Posted July 17, 2016 Author Report Share Posted July 17, 2016 I'd like to see a Laine Little Armia line or Connor Perreault Armia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomic Posted July 17, 2016 Report Share Posted July 17, 2016 I liked Copp and Armia together last season. Maybe a line of Perreault Copp Armia on the 3rd line. Ehlers Scheifele Wheeler Laine Little Stafford Perreault Copp Armia Matthias Lowry Thorburn/Burmi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrg Posted July 18, 2016 Report Share Posted July 18, 2016 On 2016-07-15 at 6:44 PM, Atomic said: Well I wouldn't stand behind the horse. The horse is super flexible. Does tons of yoga. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted July 21, 2016 Report Share Posted July 21, 2016 1 down 2 to go. . Jets sign Brandon Tanev to 1 year 2 way deal. 874 K. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ducky Posted July 21, 2016 Author Report Share Posted July 21, 2016 he will be eligible for arbitration after that is over won't he? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted July 21, 2016 Report Share Posted July 21, 2016 Dunno. He's an interesting case Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unknown Poster Posted July 21, 2016 Report Share Posted July 21, 2016 Interesting that it's only one year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted July 21, 2016 Report Share Posted July 21, 2016 It means they like him so it means they won't risk losing him to expansion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floyd Posted July 21, 2016 Report Share Posted July 21, 2016 31 minutes ago, Goalie said: It means they like him so it means they won't risk losing him to expansion Why would Chevy worry about LV picking Tanev... there's borderline guys like him available in FA every year Rich 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrostyWinnipeg Posted July 21, 2016 Report Share Posted July 21, 2016 Dunno where this Tanev love is coming from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unknown Poster Posted July 22, 2016 Report Share Posted July 22, 2016 Interesting to me because there were several teams interested in him last year and he chose the Jets. And now he's in tough to even make the team and ends up on a one year deal. I guess maybe the idea is he proves his value and signs a one way deal next summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ducky Posted July 22, 2016 Author Report Share Posted July 22, 2016 Probably looking for more than one year after this deal expires....If he isn't eligible for arbitration after this year, he will be after one more year but I think it is after this deal is over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted July 22, 2016 Report Share Posted July 22, 2016 How much power is he going to have in arbitration if he has limited NHL games? Goalie 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ducky Posted July 22, 2016 Author Report Share Posted July 22, 2016 5 hours ago, Rich said: How much power is he going to have in arbitration if he has limited NHL games? It could cut down on the number of years the Jets have him though....I see Tanev as a solid 4th line winger and good PKer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted July 22, 2016 Report Share Posted July 22, 2016 34 minutes ago, Ducky said: It could cut down on the number of years the Jets have him though....I see Tanev as a solid 4th line winger and good PKer. We seem to have a whole bunch of those guys with that kind of potential right now. If he can't beat out the competition and is stuck on the Moose and that means we have him for less time, then it means we've been playing better players. Not going to worry about losing a guy whose potential is a solid 4th line winger. Atomic 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted July 24, 2016 Report Share Posted July 24, 2016 (edited) Tanev's potential is probably 3rd line winger but on the Jets, who are stacked with forward depth, he's a 4th line winger for sure. You can't have 4 scoring lines, That's not how it works, you can have 3 but 4? I dunno, you need guys who can PK and do things of that nature, this is where guys like Tanev,Burmistrov,Dano etc come in to play, They are good players but what gives them a chance to make the team is they are also guys who can play on the PK... the PK wasn't good enough last season, neither was the PP, part of that is scheme but part of it is talent also... If the Jets can improve the PP and the PK... they will make some people take notice and realize, holy crap, this team is pretty good. Jets were very good 5 on 5, it was their special teams that killed them and goaltending, especially pavelec and hutchinson, pavelec more so tho, he wasn't good, not good at all... Fix those 3 issues and this team will be very very good. Tanev,Burmi,Dano very well could be our 4th line this year. I highly doubt Dano is sent to the Moose, i just don't see it. Like i've said for a while, i expect to see a trade or 2 cuz right now, we got to many forwards actually, a couple need to go for sure. Edited July 24, 2016 by Goalie The Unknown Poster 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unknown Poster Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 (edited) Edited August 15, 2016 by The Unknown Poster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now