Ducky Posted March 23, 2016 Report Share Posted March 23, 2016 Most analysts say Chychrun is NHL ready or VERY close. Atomic 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelownabomberfan Posted March 23, 2016 Report Share Posted March 23, 2016 2 hours ago, Atomic said: I think Chychrun will be a fantastic NHL defenceman. I'm hoping for him, Matthews, or Tkachuk to be honest. And I think we'll get one of them. yup - any one of those three and I'll be extremely happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted March 23, 2016 Report Share Posted March 23, 2016 They apparently have a consensus top 4 Matthews Laine Puljujarvi Dubois is what most feel the consensus top 4 for the Jets is. After that it's anyone's guess. I seriously doubt that the jets take Chychrun. I don't know why but I just feel because it seems likely that they will have a top 4 pick... that they won't use it on a d man. Center seems likely... Matthews Dubois or even Keller who screams Jets type of pick or a winger like Laine or Puljujarvi. People need to research dubois a bit more and you will see very similar traits that Scheif has. Very similar. He's a jets type of pick and wouldn't surprise me if that is who they take if they aren't picking top 2. Think Matthews and Laine go 1 2 tho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ducky Posted March 24, 2016 Report Share Posted March 24, 2016 Ya I agree...I'd like to see Chychrun but if they pick 5th even, I don't think they pick him. I think Puljujarvi's smart D game will interest the Jets a lot but they probably go with Laine if they pick 2nd. I hope they don't go off the board in the top 5 with Keller. I would like to see them trade up to 9 or 10 (Chicago's 1st, our 2nd, and next year's 2nd) or so if he is still available, but not top 5. PLD might become a 1C but not in the same category as Eichel, Matthews, McD if you ask me. More in along the same as Scheif and I agree that he is alot like Scheif even off the ice. He's definitely a gooder. It's sad when the off-season is more exciting than the end of the current season... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrostyWinnipeg Posted March 24, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 24, 2016 (edited) Current Standings - Mar 23 - 2359 TOR - 63 EDM - 65 WPG - 66 VAN - 66 Edited March 24, 2016 by FrostyWinnipeg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Blue&Gold Posted March 24, 2016 Report Share Posted March 24, 2016 1 hour ago, FrostyWinnipeg said: Current Standings - Mar 23 - 2359 TOR - 63 EDM - 65 WPG - 66 VAN - 66 Looks like Vancouver is making a big push for 1st Overall. With that lineup they could give Toronto a real push for worst in the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ducky Posted March 24, 2016 Report Share Posted March 24, 2016 I agree except TO has a much worse schedule than Vancouver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unknown Poster Posted March 24, 2016 Report Share Posted March 24, 2016 Its a good thing the NHL changed the rules so teams dont tank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrostyWinnipeg Posted March 24, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 24, 2016 (edited) TO might have a better goalie then us tho. Edited March 24, 2016 by FrostyWinnipeg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tacklewasher Posted March 25, 2016 Report Share Posted March 25, 2016 looking good so far tonight. Canucks have actually scored, Toronto is winng and we just gave up one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unknown Poster Posted March 25, 2016 Report Share Posted March 25, 2016 Toronto was up 4-1 on Ducks? Let them back into it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tacklewasher Posted March 25, 2016 Report Share Posted March 25, 2016 42 minutes ago, tacklewasher said: looking good so far tonight. Canucks have actually scored, Toronto is winng and we just gave up one. Spoke too soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrostyWinnipeg Posted March 25, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 25, 2016 TO beat ANA tonight in OT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted March 25, 2016 Report Share Posted March 25, 2016 Oilers beat the sharks so everyone stays within 2 points or less of each other pretty much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrostyWinnipeg Posted March 25, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 25, 2016 (edited) Current Standings - Mar 25 - 0027 TOR - 65 EDM - 67 VAN - 67 CBJ - 68 CAL - 68 WPG - 68 Tonight's Winners: CBJ , CAL Tonights Losers: TOR +2 , WPG +2 , EDM +2 , VAN +1 Gonna need a bigger list of draft elligible players cause all the name ones will be gone by the time we draft. Edited March 25, 2016 by FrostyWinnipeg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted March 25, 2016 Report Share Posted March 25, 2016 1 minute ago, FrostyWinnipeg said: Current Standings - Mar 24 - 2359 TOR - 65 EDM - 67 VAN - 67 COL - 68 CAL - 68 WPG - 68 COL = CBJ FrostyWinnipeg 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IC Khari Posted March 27, 2016 Report Share Posted March 27, 2016 March 27 ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrostyWinnipeg Posted March 28, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 28, 2016 (edited) Current Standings - Mar 27 - 2144 TOR - 65 EDM - 67 VAN - 67 CBJ - 68 CAL - 68 WPG - 68 Tonight's Winners: VAN Tonights Losers: Edited March 28, 2016 by FrostyWinnipeg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IC Khari Posted March 28, 2016 Report Share Posted March 28, 2016 Tonight's Losers? The winners FrostyWinnipeg 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrostyWinnipeg Posted March 29, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 29, 2016 Current Standings - Mar 28 - 2359 TOR - 65 EDM - 67 VAN - 67 CBJ - 68 WPG - 69 CAL - 70 Tonight's Winners: TOR , EDM, CBJ Tonights Losers: CAL +2 , WPG +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrostyWinnipeg Posted March 30, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 30, 2016 (edited) Current Standings - Mar 29 - 2204 EDM - 67 TOR - 67 VAN - 67 CBJ - 68 WPG - 69 Tonight's Winners: Fracking EDM and they did not even play! , VAN Tonights Losers: TOR +2 If we did not win those 2 in a roll we'd be drafting Auston Matthews by now. Edited March 30, 2016 by FrostyWinnipeg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted March 30, 2016 Report Share Posted March 30, 2016 On Friday, March 25, 2016 at 0:24 AM, FrostyWinnipeg said: Edit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted March 30, 2016 Report Share Posted March 30, 2016 (edited) We got a tough schedule for sure. Vancouver sucks and will finish last. You know what. If we don't pick top 4 (Matthews Laine Puljujarvi Dubois ) one of Chychrun Sergachev Juolevi helps us also and 1 2 or all 3 might or should be there when we do pick. LHD is an area of concern so regardless of top 3 or top 7 or 8 probably we should get a player that helps us sooner rather than later . Top 4 would be great but getting a LHD prospect helps us also. Perhaps more actually in the bigger picture. I'll be super stoked if we win the lottery but if not I'm more than happy with one of Chychrun Sergachev or Juolevi Edited March 30, 2016 by Goalie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted March 30, 2016 Report Share Posted March 30, 2016 (edited) I do believe Vancouver plays edmonton and Calgary tho. They all play each other once or twice more. So those are important games there. Teams below or just above us are guaranteed points. Edited March 30, 2016 by Goalie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noeller Posted March 30, 2016 Report Share Posted March 30, 2016 12 hours ago, FrostyWinnipeg said: If we did not win those 2 in a roll we'd be drafting Auston Matthews by now. in a roll? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now