Guest Posted January 31, 2014 Report Share Posted January 31, 2014 And the aftermath after Mack was gone at the QB spot...... Boltus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 31, 2014 Report Share Posted January 31, 2014 Ottawa's staff is truly impressive Not hard to put together a staff when nobody on it is in demand. I happy O'Shea at least attempted to land some guys and then had to settle. While not overly impressive, Ottawa still has a pretty decent staff, some of whom would have been more than welcomed here. If you were talking Edmonton, then yeah............. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPuDS Posted January 31, 2014 Report Share Posted January 31, 2014 And the aftermath after Mack was gone at the QB spot......Boltus *shudder* i realllllly hope that experiment has run its course.. Im nervous that with marcel back.... It hasnt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted January 31, 2014 Report Share Posted January 31, 2014 And the aftermath after Mack was gone at the QB spot......Boltus *shudder* i realllllly hope that experiment has run its course.. Im nervous that with marcel back.... It hasnt. It really would be nice to know WHO decided and why they gave Boltus play time while Goltz sat on the bench..... I'd feel at least slightly relieved if it was revealed that Burke insisted on playing him rather then MB.... Logan007 and Mr Dee 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuranBoldenRules Posted January 31, 2014 Report Share Posted January 31, 2014 Ottawa's staff is truly impressive Not hard to put together a staff when nobody on it is in demand. I happy O'Shea at least attempted to land some guys and then had to settle. While not overly impressive, Ottawa still has a pretty decent staff, some of whom would have been more than welcomed here. If you were talking Edmonton, then yeah............. I'd love Mike Gibson as a OL coach. Other than that, pretty average to meh and inexperienced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 31, 2014 Report Share Posted January 31, 2014 And the aftermath after Mack was gone at the QB spot......Boltus *shudder* i realllllly hope that experiment has run its course.. Im nervous that with marcel back.... It hasnt. It really would be nice to know WHO decided and why they gave Boltus play time while Goltz sat on the bench..... I'd feel at least slightly relieved if it was revealed that Burke insisted on playing him rather then MB.... Let's not pretend that Goltz played well at all, or that he even deserved another shot. Aside from Boltus being horrendous, there was no other logical reason for Goltz to ever see the field again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iso_55 Posted January 31, 2014 Report Share Posted January 31, 2014 yeah Iso give O'Shea a break man. I like that he's working on several different options, rather than just looking at a list and saying "he'll do" and moving on. He's also a rookie HC so he's going to have a bit of a learning curve. I hope the O'Shea reign lasts a long time, but he will make some mistakes. Even Huff still makes mistakes....cough cough Ameet Pall...cough... Gack. Spit. Green flem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan007 Posted January 31, 2014 Report Share Posted January 31, 2014 And the aftermath after Mack was gone at the QB spot......Boltus *shudder* i realllllly hope that experiment has run its course.. Im nervous that with marcel back.... It hasnt. It really would be nice to know WHO decided and why they gave Boltus play time while Goltz sat on the bench..... I'd feel at least slightly relieved if it was revealed that Burke insisted on playing him rather then MB.... Let's not pretend that Goltz played well at all, or that he even deserved another shot. Aside from Boltus being horrendous, there was no other logical reason for Goltz to ever see the field again. Yeah you're right. Goltz, being able to run the ball and actually make a few plays by throwing, was just as equally bad as Boltus, who couldn't even hold onto the ball after the snap. SPuDS 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17to85 Posted January 31, 2014 Report Share Posted January 31, 2014 And the aftermath after Mack was gone at the QB spot......Boltus *shudder* i realllllly hope that experiment has run its course.. Im nervous that with marcel back.... It hasnt. It really would be nice to know WHO decided and why they gave Boltus play time while Goltz sat on the bench..... I'd feel at least slightly relieved if it was revealed that Burke insisted on playing him rather then MB.... Let's not pretend that Goltz played well at all, or that he even deserved another shot. Aside from Boltus being horrendous, there was no other logical reason for Goltz to ever see the field again. There was the most logical reason... he was better than Boltus, especially at short yardage/goal line situations. You don't bench a guy because he played poorly in some starts when the guy who is replacing him is worse than he is, that's just stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 31, 2014 Report Share Posted January 31, 2014 Yeah you're right. Goltz, being able to run the ball and actually make a few plays by throwing, was just as equally bad as Boltus, who couldn't even hold onto the ball after the snap. There was the most logical reason... he was better than Boltus, especially at short yardage/goal line situations. You don't bench a guy because he played poorly in some starts when the guy who is replacing him is worse than he is, that's just stupid. I understand and agree with both points, my point was pretty simple I would think, Goltz didn't deserve to see the field, he was atrocious out there, he could run.............. that's about it. Leaving Boltus out there was a stupid mistake though, especially in short yardage situations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan007 Posted January 31, 2014 Report Share Posted January 31, 2014 Yeah you're right. Goltz, being able to run the ball and actually make a few plays by throwing, was just as equally bad as Boltus, who couldn't even hold onto the ball after the snap. There was the most logical reason... he was better than Boltus, especially at short yardage/goal line situations. You don't bench a guy because he played poorly in some starts when the guy who is replacing him is worse than he is, that's just stupid. I understand and agree with both points, my point was pretty simple I would think, Goltz didn't deserve to see the field, he was atrocious out there, he could run.............. that's about it. Leaving Boltus out there was a stupid mistake though, especially in short yardage situations. Right, but our point was just that, we were stuck with both of them, Goltz should have been used. I still think he's the best short yardage guy out there right now. Should bring him in as a short yardage/RB and mix up what he does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 31, 2014 Report Share Posted January 31, 2014 Right, but our point was just that, we were stuck with both of them, Goltz should have been used. I still think he's the best short yardage guy out there right now. Should bring him in as a short yardage/RB and mix up what he does. I'd agree with short yardage, but that's about it. Anything more than one play every 2 and out is more than enough for Goltz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPuDS Posted February 1, 2014 Report Share Posted February 1, 2014 And the aftermath after Mack was gone at the QB spot......Boltus *shudder* i realllllly hope that experiment has run its course.. Im nervous that with marcel back.... It hasnt. Yay. Premonition was incorrect! *does happy dance* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DR. CFL Posted February 1, 2014 Report Share Posted February 1, 2014 Interesting how another thread gets twisted off topic. Now class stick to the topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 3, 2014 Report Share Posted March 3, 2014 With Jonathan Himebauch brought in to be the Run Game coordinator and Offensive Line Coach, am I the only one wondering what Steve McAdoo actually does ? Steve McAdoo Offensive Coordinator Jonathan Himebauch Offensive Line/Run Game Coordinator Jarious Jackson Quarterbacks/Passing Game Coordinator/Player Development Kez McCorvey Receivers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbill2004 Posted March 3, 2014 Report Share Posted March 3, 2014 McAdoo is the OC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted March 3, 2014 Report Share Posted March 3, 2014 I'm 110% sure he understands McAdoo is the OC. What he is asking is if there is an offensive line coach, a receivers coach, a passing game coordinator and a run game coordinator, what exactly does the OC role entail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 4, 2014 Report Share Posted March 4, 2014 What he is asking is if there is an offensive line coach, a receivers coach, a passing game coordinator and a run game coordinator, what exactly does the OC role entail. Yup, this is my question, everything seems to be taking care of, so what exactly will McAdoo be doing ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacquie Posted March 4, 2014 Report Share Posted March 4, 2014 I would think he would be doing what every other OC does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbill2004 Posted March 4, 2014 Report Share Posted March 4, 2014 I would think he would be doing what every other OC does. Exactly. I don't understand the question. All teams have position specific coaches. It's like asking what Mike O'Shea does because he has an OC, DC and ST coordinator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floyd Posted March 4, 2014 Report Share Posted March 4, 2014 I believe he will be 'coordinating' these guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 4, 2014 Report Share Posted March 4, 2014 I believe he will be 'coordinating' these guys. Finally a decent answer. The reason I asked, was because if Himebach is coorindating the run game and Jackson the passing game, does that mean McAdoo is calling the plays and dictating the offensive game plan or is he going to be the hands off type essentially "overseeing" the offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floyd Posted March 4, 2014 Report Share Posted March 4, 2014 I believe he will be 'coordinating' these guys. Finally a decent answer. The reason I asked, was because if Himebach is coorindating the run game and Jackson the passing game, does that mean McAdoo is calling the plays and dictating the offensive game plan or is he going to be the hands off type essentially "overseeing" the offense. McAdoo is a total rookie OC... you would think he will lean on these guys a fair bit. I think its a smart move by Jones to try and load up the offensive side of things - then he can just focus on defence. We'll see how it works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DR. CFL Posted March 4, 2014 Report Share Posted March 4, 2014 Maybe Winnipeg better get a quality o line coach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now