The Unknown Poster Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 We may yet win but how does Helle feel today? If Pavs got hurt Maurice might go with an empty net. Toby done for the night. What happened? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrostyWinnipeg Posted January 25, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 (edited) Just now, The Unknown Poster said: We may yet win but how does Helle feel today? If Pavs got hurt Maurice might go with an empty net. Toby done for the night. What happened? Skate monster tripped him into boards. And now 4-3 Sharks because someone not cover his guy. Stu? Little? Edited January 25, 2017 by FrostyWinnipeg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iHeart Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 I really want to put a curse on the sharks right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unknown Poster Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 Laine had that guy. Or didn't have him. Stu and trouba were both on the other side. Is the Pavs experiment over? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iHeart Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 no. he should back up next game and Hell starts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrostyWinnipeg Posted January 25, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 Just now, The Unknown Poster said: Laine had that guy. Or didn't have him. Stu and trouba were both on the other side. Is the Pavs experiment over? Helle will play CHI, his GAA is 1 against them i think, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IC Khari Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 (edited) 17 minutes ago, The Unknown Poster said: Laine had that guy. Or didn't have him. Stu and trouba were both on the other side. Is the Pavs experiment over? Edited January 25, 2017 by IC Khari Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judd Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 That might've been one of the worst penalty shot calls I've ever seen in my life. CLEARLY a stick check, call it a slash if you want, MAYBE, but 0% chance that is EVER a penalty shot. I don't like saying this but that ref should almost face a fine. HardCoreBlue 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unknown Poster Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 That no goal call is the type of call that should get a ref dismissed. This is the NHL for crying out loud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iHeart Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 ugh I hope the fans of the Winnipeg Jets page on facebook shares that link for the complaints department referee division again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrostyWinnipeg Posted January 25, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 Well we lost but it's an angry loss so we came away with something. Atomic 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iHeart Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 #BlameTheRefs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BomberBall Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 Wow, did we ever get screwed over in the 3rd. Disgraceful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 (edited) Told ya when I said might as well give the sharks 2 points. Refs did. With that being said... we were the better team but the SJ goalie stood on his head. Edited January 25, 2017 by Goalie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HardCoreBlue Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 10 minutes ago, Judd said: That might've been one of the worst penalty shot calls I've ever seen in my life. CLEARLY a stick check, call it a slash if you want, MAYBE, but 0% chance that is EVER a penalty shot. I don't like saying this but that ref should almost face a fine. Wow, I'm with you. Rarely, rarely do I ever pin as much influence on the ref but after watching the third period I'm befuddled. Not only with the penalty shot, but how does the ref blow that whistle? Call goalie interference but why the whistle? It was too quick for him to say he lost sight of the puck. Oh and I wish someone would have clocked Burns. Someone needed to stand up for Ehlers in what Burns was doing to him. Someone needs to tell Thorburn instead of randomly picking fights for show, challenging players like Burns when he's ragdolling our smaller players is what he is there for. Atomic 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bustamente Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 Penalty shot was bogus, but the Jets last goal would not of counted even if the whistle had not been blown. Goalie 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iHeart Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 the fans of the winnipeg jets on facebook has suggested to complain to the NHL feed on twitter, I did that as well as to the @NHLPA on twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 Right call on the no goal. Seen that 1000 times. Very bad call on the penalty shot. Pav was back to being Pav again with his 840 save percentage. You take that penalty shot away which probably should have been stopped... why not just help trouba out and play the puck pav... it was 10 feet from you but... still let in 3. Not blaming pav here. Starting him was a terrible coaching decision bustamente and Atomic 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 1 minute ago, iHeart said: the fans of the winnipeg jets on facebook has suggested to complain to the NHL feed on twitter, I did that as well as to the @NHLPA on twitter Why bother. It changes nothing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bustamente Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 4 minutes ago, iHeart said: the fans of the winnipeg jets on facebook has suggested to complain to the NHL feed on twitter, I did that as well as to the @NHLPA on twitter You don't think the NHL or NHLPA care about little old Winnipeg do you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iHeart Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 let me think, if this happened to a team like San Jose or Anaheim or to Arizona, they would listen, besides I need some way to vent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HardCoreBlue Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 1 minute ago, Goalie said: Right call on the no goal. Seen that 1000 times. Very bad call on the penalty shot. Pav was back to being Pav again with his 840 save percentage. You take that penalty shot away which probably should have been stopped... why not just help trouba out and play the puck pav... it was 10 feet from you but... still let in 3. Not blaming pav here. Starting him was a terrible coaching decision So have I. Totally disagree. The ref assumed the play before it happened. A big no no for a ref. I do agree with you about Pav playing the puck. And the Shark player made that penalty shot look easy. Ugh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 (edited) 1 minute ago, HardCoreBlue said: So have I. Totally disagree. The ref assumed the play before it happened. A big no no for a ref. I do agree with you about Pav playing the puck. And the Shark player made that penalty shot look easy. Ugh. It's goalie interference if it goes in. Buff pushed the goalies pads hard with his stick. No goal. You can't push the goalie in the net like that Edited January 25, 2017 by Goalie bustamente 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bustamente Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Goalie said: It's goalie interference if it goes in. Buff pushed the goalies pads hard with his stick. No goal. Exactly the Sharks challenged the play for goalie interference which was not needed according to the ref because of intent to blow whistle. Edited January 25, 2017 by bustamente Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ducky Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Goalie said: Right call on the no goal. Seen that 1000 times. Very bad call on the penalty shot. Pav was back to being Pav again with his 840 save percentage. You take that penalty shot away which probably should have been stopped... why not just help trouba out and play the puck pav... it was 10 feet from you but... still let in 3. Not blaming pav here. Starting him was a terrible coaching decision You blame him and then say you aren't? Edited January 25, 2017 by Ducky Atomic 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now