ahhhh! thanks for that

 

I am especially interested to see what the commentators say when the fans booed the hell out of the unnecessary roughness penalty  (when the QB ran and dove headfirst) and the command center overrode it.

4 hours ago, Fraser said:

I am especially interested to see what the commentators say when the fans booed the hell out of the unnecessary roughness penalty  (when the QB ran and dove headfirst) and the command center overrode it.

WHat point in the game was that, as I would be interested too.

Great game. Their commentary on   Lefevour was hilarious. First he's the best QB since Doug Flutie, living up to the 18 on his jersey. Second half...looks like Drew Willy will be starting next game. 

6 hours ago, Fraser said:

I am especially interested to see what the commentators say when the fans booed the hell out of the unnecessary roughness penalty  (when the QB ran and dove headfirst) and the command center overrode it.

When they first looked at it Duane Forde said he didn't think it was a penalty and then they showed another angle and they weren't sure. The play starts at the 46:15 mark of the video. And a minor point, it was the "eye in the sky" video official who overturned the ruling, not the command centre.

Edited September 19, 20169 yr by Jacquie

I'm more interested in seeing the TO pick that was taken off the board. I was fairly certain that he didn't maintain control when I saw it at speed but the in house shots were not conclusive.

19 minutes ago, Dragon37 said:

I'm more interested in seeing the TO pick that was taken off the board. I was fairly certain that he didn't maintain control when I saw it at speed but the in house shots were not conclusive.

If I'm thinking of the same play it starts at the 1:30:18 mark. They didn't show a replay of the interception but from looking at it at game speed I don't think there is any doubt that the Argo player maintained control of the ball. 

If you're talking about the first interception, replay clearly showed the nose of the ball hitting the ground before the db can secure it.  The freeze frame on the last bit of replay showed it best.

10 hours ago, Mark H. said:

Great game. Their commentary on   Lefevour was hilarious. First he's the best QB since Doug Flutie, living up to the 18 on his jersey. Second half...looks like Drew Willy will be starting next game. 

Or how after 17 unanswered points Rod Black said it's been back and forth all game.

Pretty weak no yards call at 1:02:20 and then not calling the roughing the kicker which I have seen worse calls for.

11 minutes ago, Bomber_fanaddict said:

Pretty weak no yards call at 1:02:20 and then not calling the roughing the kicker which I have seen worse calls for.

Doesn't it feel good that we can legitimately complain about calls and still win? Like a breath of fresh air.

2 minutes ago, Fan Boy said:

Doesn't it feel good that we can legitimately complain about calls and still win? Like a breath of fresh air.

Agreed! Rather then having to send the league piles of hate mail and firing up the conspiracy generator

And the PI on Randall at 1:19:20. Gurley trips over his own feet. I think it still would have been called even if t was challenged but that shouldn't have been a PI IMO.

I don't think that one would have survived a challenge. I think Randall should have been more vocal to MOS but on the other had you don't want to go all Jonesy on challenges. 

28 minutes ago, Bomber_fanaddict said:

Pretty weak no yards call at 1:02:20

Agreed. I thought he timed it perfectly.

That PI call on Randall was even more weak in slow mo. 

If the BB get those kind of calls against the Stamps, it will be a tough game.