Goalie

But could still face st louis

It does tho. Not in stats but technically it's back to back to back

I agree. Ducks are vulnerable

Technically back to back to back shutouts for pav

187 minutes shutout streak for pav. Back to back to back technical shutouts

Potential pr player too. Practice roster that is not public relations

It's gonna be windy lol

Be nice to call up Hellebyuck and let him play but won't happen. Guys like copp peluso Ellerby will probably play tho

You do realize that 95 percent of those games have been this year tho right. You do realize all those games buff had missed was when Maurice was coach right? You do realize he took over last season right? That's the 2013 2014 season.

I think we win and Calgary will win too

Interesting stat again...Did you know the Jets are more likely to win without all-star Dustin Byfuglien in the lineup? Since the start of 2013-2014, The jets are 12-4-0 without Buff in the lineup. Things that make you go hmm.

Just out of curiosity how many sell-outs did we have last season? 2? 3? Add a couple more sell-outs and a playoff game and yeah, they probably easily make 4.5 and don't have to dip in to a "rainy day fund".

Good post from a guy on hfboards.. worth a read actually. Nevermind, found it. Here is the number I personally care about, given, like I said, the absolute tire fire this team was under Noel, and dating back to Atlanta. Since Maurice began coaching this team, Pavelec has faced a grand total of 1939 shots, saving 1774 of them and accumulating a SV% of .915. That, for me, is a better indication of what Pavelec may be to this team under the most important circumstances. Not Atlanta days, not Noel days, not 3000 shots dating back to April of 2013 (two years ago), not 3000 shots dating back to November 2011, but what we have endured and experienced under Paul Maurice. To me, that is the most prevailing of facts here. Having a competent head coach, structure and team Pavelec has EVER played behind, and that goes for a lot of these players. And what are we seeing? we're seeing some success. So I do not give a rats behind essentially what Pavelec did in Atlanta, under Noel, etc. Put a player in an incompetent and inefficient situation and you just might get incompetent and inefficient results. Put a bunch of players in a competent and efficient situation, and you just might collectively get competent and efficient results. As a group and team, right from Maurice down to the players we are seeing a net positive. In short, I do not believe Pavelec is a "new" goalie. I do not believe he has totally "reinvented" himself. I do believe he has perhaps worked and altered some techniques. I do believe playing within a structured team that Maurice has incorporated has a played a role. If each of these players buys in and brings some level of positive ingredient to the ice, and it works with this system and such, that is all I can ask and want and hope we endure success. So far, since the day Maurice was hired, we've seen that collectively from this team. Heck, all the majority wanted out of Pavelec was a .915 SV%. He is and has done that under Paul Maurice. Don't feed me old rubbish statistics that to me, are misleading because of the ineptitude that was displayed in Atlanta AND in Winnipeg prior to Paul becoming head coach and essentially saving this team from more losses, frustration, blowing things up, etc. It was a write off before and not a true telling tale, in my own opinion. There is a reason this team is where it is today. There is a reason under Paul Maurice this team has gone 115 GP: 60 - 38 - 17. There is a reason the underlying numbers of this team are good. And there is a reason prior to Paul Maurice all of these things were non-existent.

They made a profit of 3.9 million last season after expenses not including the debt payment, they had a reserve fund of 1.6 million, they took that 3.9 and 500,000 or so from the reserve fund and made the 4.5 million debt payment. They didn't lose money, they made 3.9 million.

No he's not the long term answer but he's played well recently and right now, regardless, he's the best we got.

It's not really that newsworthy since it happens every day really.. in my opinion, it's irrelevant that it was a cop shooting a black guy... it could have been a white guy shooting a white guy, a black guy shooting a black guy.. it's all the same really. The only difference really is it was a police officer but those who say it happens everyday, they are right. It does, it just doesn't always involve police officers.

2 scenarios to clinch tonight.. 1. WE BEAT COLORADO and we clinch regardless 2. We lose to Colorado but Calgary beats LA in regulation and we clinch a spot.

There seems to be more people who for some reason can't admit that the guy has actually been playing pretty well the last 10-15 games. People can harp on past numbers all they want but.. those past numbers have nothing to do with the fact that he's played very well recently and is pretty much the reason the Jets can clinch tonight.

So it wasn't a question Gbill asked. It was more of a long winded lawless like statement?

I think it's as simple as the cop has a gun. He's got the power. Sometimes cops are dicks. Not all cops but sometimes I think they do like to power trip and I think this shooting here is more about a power tripping gun happy cop than anything else. Just cuz the cop is white and the victim was black don't mean it's racism. The problem seems to be the media and a portion of the population like to play the race card but reality is sometimes Cops are just power tripping gun happy pricks. I only saw a portion of the video so who really knows what happened b4 the camera was rolling. All I saw was a cop letting off many rounds in to a guy who ran away. Who really knows why he was running. Honestly if I didn't know the video was real, I would have thought it was fake and rigged cuz video I saw, victim ran and cop shot him a bunch of times or missed a bunch and got him good once and dude fell. Honestly first time I watched it I was like sounds like a pop gun really. Sounded odd. Like I said tho. Don't know what happened b4 the video was recording so can't say it's racist just cuz one is white and other is black.

Tnse trademarked winnipeg whiteout so yeah whiteout it is

If the kings lose in regulation they are done. If jets win in regulation or ot or Shootout and kings win. Kings are done

Not exactly. Most kings can get is 97 points. We have 96. We win one game or go 1-0-1. Kings can win out and we still in.

Metro said they had 1.6 in the reserve. 3.9 + 1.6 = small profit when you subtract 4.5. Penton quoted wicek who might be wrong

Go flames vs kings