Goalie

Arena

Honestly, what gives you the right when all last season you were crapping on Ritchie Hall. Almost like it was personal. You see, on a fan forum, ppl come to chat about all sorts of things, things such as inconsistent passing game or a crapppy D or even firing coaches. Its a weird concept where we all have different opinions on certain elements of the game and just cuz u or anyone else says so it dont mean you are right. Matter of fact you appear to be dead wrong about Ritchie Hall, perhaps you are dead wrong here also. Then again, who knows. Fan forum.. Where ppl have different opinions. What a concept. Bro, you were captain of the fishing witch hunt ship last season talking about Hall.

Says the guy who is waiting for the D to suck so he can start going off on Ritchie Hall again. ******* hypocrite

Nobody GAF about yards. TOP does matter tho.. Eventually you will see.

IDGAF about stats.. The only ones that should matter to an O in particular is first downs and to a lesser extent Time of Possession. Its about not moving the ball consistently through the air. Maybe that's more Lapo tho. But the amount of 4 yard passes when you need 7 is pissing me off. Staying on the field is more important than 300 yards passing. We dont do that tho and haven't for some time. Im def in the its Lapo group tho. Ppl likely get confused and dont get Nichols is just an extension of Lapo. Lapo calling plays.. Nichols running them.

Nobody except you brings up passing yards... Seriously.. Get a legit grip on reality.. Nobody GAF about passing yards.. But when u get 60 percent of them in 2 passes and 40 percent in 17 other attempts.. Despite you actually not reading peoples posts cuz nobody has said passing yards matter, its a problem. You aren't moving the ball in the air consistently. You lose your **** cuz in your head its 2 things.. 1. Yards. 2. Matt Nchols vs Streveler Nobody has said either of those tho.. Do u even read posts? Cuz all I've said is consistency is a problem with the passing game. If you don't think consistently moving the ball in the air matters in the CFL.. You must be new.

This happens every week tho. Our O is consistently inconsistent

This is exactly what im saying. Its a red flag.. Yes we are winning and are 4 0. That's great. I just have yet to see a game where all 3 phases are going. Thats troubling. On the plus side... We are 4 and 0 and could be much better and more consistent on O.

Briggs = unlikely as he was in a sling on the sidelines

If i cant come to a fan forum to discuss aspects of the game.. Then whats the point of a fan forum? Ppl get their panties in a bunch over stating pure facts now? Im thrilled they won.. I just am not pleased with their 2nd half effort and play calling. I don't know what's so wrong about that.. Is everything rainbows and puppy dogs? Argos suck.. I would have liked to see our O put up more points. Did we have 100 yards in the 2nd half ?

No. Its not that at all. Its discussing an important aspect of the game.. The ability to consistently.. Ill say it again.. The ability to consistently move the ball through the air. We dont do that.

Nichols was good in the first half. I can admit that. Surely play calling plays a role.. Its the Lapo special.. We have all seen it over and over with a lead of 2 TDs plus.. But.. At the same time.. If you cant move the sticks through the air, which we dont really seem to be able to do consistently.. Minus Andrew Harris making 4 guys miss.. This will all catch up.. Eventually Harris wont put up 100 plus.. Then what? We cant move the ball through the air. This is what im talking about.. Its not about not liking Matt Nichols or being Anti Nichols.. Its facts. Our O is big play, Harris or 4 yard passes. Stats? Who cares but being able to get 1sts downs through the air is important in the CFL. Game managing to me means staying on the field... Killing the clock. We dont do that.

Why discuss aspects of a game when u can just insult people for stating facts.

**** you pretty much. Im talking facts. Its not my fault u can't accept it. You are on ignore now cuz for some reason talking facts with you... Yup witch hunt. 2 passes for 135.. 17 for 80 ish.. Yup.. Witch hunt.

Lol. U just can't accept reality. Its a joke actually.. Bring up Reilly like that's relevant some how.. Reillys worst game as a pro at that

No. How do u argue facts.. He did have 2 passes for 135 ish.. He did have 17 others for 80 ish. He was ok in the 1st half.. Altho 33 6 and having 10 1sts downs isn't exactly managing the game

IDGAF about BC or Mike Reilly.. Mike Reilly has nothing to do with Matt Nichols and PLAP. Phony narrative based on 2 plus seasons.. Yup.

Our QB or OC playcalling needs to improve. I will say i think Nichols Streveler whoever can only do so much when our OC decides to go ultra conservative. So i don't know how much is QB and how much is on Lapo Im guessing.. Nichols was great in 1st half so.. Tells me the 2nd half is mostly play calling

You can pretend this is this game exclusive all you want.. This is our O for 3 seasons now. If Harris sucks like he did 2 weeks ago.. We don't move the ball in the air. Do you watch every game? Cuz when Harris isnt going... We dont move the ball through the air.

Its a fact. Its our O. Big play or nothing

Whats your ******* point.... And when Harris isnt going.. Nichols still puts up 2 big passes and a bunch for 3 yards. The real whining is ppl refusing to accept facts about our O play. Yup. Harris. Guess what tho.. There's been games where Harris has sucked also.. Nichols still puts up just over 200 yards

Your problem is you think ppl dont like Nichols.. I like him. But putting up most your yards in 2 plays and then half of those 2 in 17 other passes isnt being a game manager and its not playing good.

Insults.. When u got nothing to say.. Insult people for staring pure fact

Yeah.. But this isnt just today exclusive. This is our O. Big plays or nothing.