HardCoreBlue

Getting smoked and dominated 7-2 is much different than losing 2-1 in a back and forth game that could have gone either way. Each of the above scenarios require their own type of adjustments/strategies heading into the next game. It’s not the same other than both incurred a loss. And I agree with you, this isn’t just on Helle in being shellacked 7-2, everyone shares the blame.

Here’s hoping it’s the ‘end it’ game.

Let's pan to the parents (insert other relatives/spouses as appropriate) in the stands every 3 seconds to get their reactions. Fun!

Knowing obviously it was not the main reason we lost this stinker and as objectively as possible, I’m still very confused on how they confirmed the original call on the ice of Perfetti no goal. The one angle from behind the net zoomed in clearly showed the glove catching net fully behind the post. What else does one need? This is why we have technology.

Nope, it is not the same other than both scores resulted in losses. But it obviously doesn't mean the Jets are done. How they respond on Sunday will be telling.

This is absolutely true. Sunday may tell us if the Jets are for real this year or just another season full of mirages. How they respond to a now very confident Blue team will be telling. Adversity here we go.

When angles show it clearly in that doesn’t reconcile with not conclusive enough. Anyways not going to win 16 straight.

I guess but all the glove netting is behind the line so don’t matter. Okay whatever. Just win the rest of the game steal one next game and finish this back at home. It’s a long grind to the finals, ain’t going to win every game. Sunquist acting tough. Same guy who falls when a Jet looks at him.

I don’t understand that call. That one angle clearly showed it was in. What are we missing? Do all angles have to show it in? Like what?

That one angle it shows it’s in.

Are you kidding me. Wow. What is with these refs. Let them play ffs. Colin Miller showing some rust.

Just win the next two periods and take that mo into the fourth game.

Great time to show people what kind of team they are when the chips are down. Do they fold and look toward the fourth game or do they put everything on the line to win the next two periods even if they don’t actually win the game?

Apparently holding the stick is legal now. Refs enjoying watching the game.

Well then.

Captain obvious says we need to score the next goal.

Apparently Faulk can jump on and start hammering Miller while he’s down. Nothing to see here. Yup consistency that’s all that’s asked.

When we’re losing these commentators become even more irritating.

Okay we’ve spotted them 2 now. We can start playing. Jets are being embarrassed right now. Should be 5-0.

Jets are scrambling. Important kill. Settle down get back to Jet hockey.

Nervous emoji.

Game #3.

It's probably cuz I'm an extremely nervous hardcore Jet fan (my wife says its like watching a caged animal when I'm watching a Jets (Bombers) game) but this series has been extremely close if you look at each games first two periods. Where we seem to have the edge thus far is the third periods. Being selfish, I'd like us to extend this dominance to the first two periods.

For sure but just makes no sense to me from a convenience and safety perspective, especially the bench size where the visitor goaltender is sitting by himself in the crowd away from his team, weird. But that’s just me.

I'm more fascinated by the person who thought it was a good idea to make a visitors bench to small where their back-up goaltender can't sit with them so he basically sits with the home team crowd plus have the visitors team locker-room where the visitors have to cross the ice to get there. Brilliant.