Tracker

Absolutely agree that we cannot let Jennings get into a rhythm and/or get ahead by more than a field goal or so. Our offence is not potent enough to play catch-up every game. If Jennings get rattled or frustrated, he will likely start trying to force the ball.

McDuffie and Fogg are both quick and fast but Fogg seems to have that spidey sense to find the holes.

One can dream, can one not?

Well, there would be a warm comfy place here....

(yawn)

Could it come down to the kickers? If so, I like our chances.

Afterthought: Could Hurl's performance have anything to do with Ottawa's playing the whole farm team? And you may wish to download Adblock Plus (its free) or download Baidu Antivirus with built in ad-block (also free and very good).

At the rising and the setting of the sun, we shall remember them.

I beg to differ. Not so much this year apart from the said game, but in the two previous years, there were many games in which the Bombers were showing by their body language that they did not expect to win and played like it. It may not have been O'Shea's fault- often the team just didn't have the horses, but the end result was the same- slowly onto the field and a step behind the other teams.

I hope Mr. Feoli-Gudino gives one of his better efforts on Sunday. I thought he was way better than Kolhert in his limited field time but when he started a few games ago, he was pathetic.

A player like Loffler comes along maybe once every 10-15 years and good receivers pop up in the CFL pretty much every year.

"Mailed it in?" Are you referring to the last home game against Ottawa?

I would prefer to see a double-reverse half-gainer with a twist.

Roosevelt is a heckuva player and if he had been on a better team, he would have been a contender.

Gable is very good when healthy, which doesn't seem to be one of his assets.

I'm not sure in which universe the Riders would have been assumed to beat the Lions, so if that was the probable (even guaranteed) scenario, we weren't going to have a home playoff anyways, so where is the logic in risking the only quarterback we have had in a gazillion years who was good enough to get us into the playoffs? Realistically, the only thing at stake was playing BC or Hamilton.

Historically, the Bombers have not been good at bringing in stiff competition at the QB position- we've been fortunate have even one good QB in camp.

Or what? Had we lost with Glenn we would have crossed over to the East. I think we still would have won with Glenn but moving over to the ESF doesn't sound like too much of a penalty.

Most of us don't have to go that far to find troglodytes. Often in our own families.

No question that BC is beatable, and if the Bombers win convincingly, it would be a great confidence-builder for meeting the Stamps. The key might be forcing BC into a turnover early.

Mr. Popp certainly made his departure memorable.

Ugh. Might as well use your left hand and a bowl of water. Are you a fan of thong-style Depends?

Life is like a roll of toilet paper- closer you get to the end, the faster it goes.

I could learn to live with that.

I voted to replace LaPolice, but there is a caveat. I don't know if there is or will be a better option out there, so we may be stuck no matter what we want. Secondly, there is good evidence that Nichols is much more effective in a dink-and-dunk offense than a bombs-away one. We really do not know how the team would have looked with a QB who has an arm like Burris or Jennings, and therefore the offensive numbers may not represent LaPolice's best.